4
My2SonsAreMarines 4 points ago +4 / -0

"Wong Kim Ark, he had to write a book declaring that "I am an American" because he was judged by his appearance. He came legally and thrived! He is proud to be an American! And has a POWERFUL message for all of us. So I believe him when he says that he was on the team that recovered the bodies."

What in the hell are you talking about? Wong Kim Ark is the name of a Chinese fellow whose case came before the USSC in 1898 where definition of citizenship was at issue. https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/169/649

The man's name running for Senate from VA is Hung Cao. Hung Cao is a very accomplished man who was at one time a refugee originally from Vietnam.

Readers should seriously question your ability to process information accurately.

0
My2SonsAreMarines 0 points ago +4 / -4

"The problem, as I see it, is that many anons are not capable of disseminating large quantities of information quickly and comprehending what's really being said about a given topic."

Disseminating?

Perhaps you mean "digesting"?

Proper word usage will boost the credibility of your position.

2
My2SonsAreMarines 2 points ago +2 / -0

Just like J6-ers who will be freed due to the USSC decision in the Fisher case, there are people serving prison time based on the renderings of "experts." I see quite a number of convictions being overturned here.

3
My2SonsAreMarines 3 points ago +3 / -0

Reminds me of "Dolly" the genetically engineered sheep back in 1996 who was cloned from a single adult somatic cell. At the time it was a fearsome break through in technology, but the theory that people could be cloned in a similar fashion just did not happen, largely due to technological limitations. It has given rise to some cell therapies which have only proven to be marginally successfull for all the $$ dumped in to them and the market hype but we are not yet at a place where just whole organs can be generated from a single cell, never mind a entirely cloned human body.

Whether it's machine learning or polymerase chain reaction in the end being employed to create protiens, it is all still information - sophisticated information to be sure - but still just information as a strand. There are 3-d crosslinkages and linear internal bondings which are present most often that define the spatial necessity of the molecules which in turn become proteins

If information integrity in-process cannot be perfectly assured errors will result in failures, not new and improved organisms (or mehanisms created through machine learning of any kind.) It is why Darwinian evolution by random chance is such a deeply flawed concept.

4
My2SonsAreMarines 4 points ago +4 / -0

He was a big disappointment to (D)'s in the deSantis face off last year, especially when deSantis pulled out that poop graphic.

10
My2SonsAreMarines 10 points ago +10 / -0

Flush the DC Circuit. How, you say? Congress has the Constiutional power to authorize the creation and dissolution of Federal Courts.

After Trump gets re-elected, Congress dissolves the DC circuit, and reconstitutes it with 18 fresh appointments all made by Donald Trump. Sound like a plan?

2
My2SonsAreMarines 2 points ago +2 / -0

Imagine the budget savings the US Government could potentially enjoy by defunding the alphabet agencies which have no Constitutional authority to exist in the first place!!!

3
My2SonsAreMarines 3 points ago +3 / -0

Scalia is murdered on a hunting ranch in Texas and all you say is "God Works in Mysterious Ways." What a fucking stupid consequential association you have made.

For your information the original Chevron decision was decided 6-0 in 1984. Scalia was not on the USSC until 1986. No Reagan appointee voted for it (Sandra Day O'Connor recused herself).

Roberts as Chief Justice assigns who writes what opinions. It is unmistakeable fact that Gorsuch's 10th Circuit opinion informed the favorable outcome of Loper in overturning Chevron (1984).

Scalia was, as most jusitces were, a supporter of Chevron intially, but later expressed misgivings about Chevron's misapplication as the Administrative over reaches became more apparent.

1
My2SonsAreMarines 1 point ago +1 / -0

My parents were 1960's-1970's era JBS. Dad was a physician (an allergist). Kosher process indicates that food conforms with Mosaic Laws for purity and allowable (Levitical) content. It is more than just a "tax" for a rabbinical certification. Parents always preferred Kosher from a dietary/health perspective.

I am no defender of Zionists and I despise Talmudiists but this statement is absolute bullshit:

"if you buy these foods and eat them all the Jewish comnies have to do is add a chemical to the water supply and it combines with a chemical in the food to give you cancer"

8
My2SonsAreMarines 8 points ago +8 / -0

The Airbus A321 is a member of the Airbus A320 family of short to medium range, narrow-body, commercial passenger twin engine jet airliners; it carries 185 to 236 passengers. Wikipedia

2
My2SonsAreMarines 2 points ago +2 / -0

"It made it possible for me to see the doctor and get treated when I was shitting blood every 10 to 15 minutes and I couldn't even leave the house."

With a screen name like "Gay4Jesus" there's probably a more chronic behavioral source of your colonic problems that socialized medicine and its bastard stepchild, Obamacare, can't cure.

4
My2SonsAreMarines 4 points ago +4 / -0

"NY Test"? A backwardly masked non message supposedly intended for those in the know? You are straining at a gnat, OP.

1
My2SonsAreMarines 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'd like to hear this one played at a Trump rally:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6SVsDD8x-lI

" Let the Lion Run Free" (song by "4HIM")

6
My2SonsAreMarines 6 points ago +6 / -0

"Today's argument was that my youngest daughter took my 20 year old daughter's coloring book and colored a fucking page in it. "

Does "20 year old daughter's coloring book" not raise any suspicions about this post to you?

3
My2SonsAreMarines 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'd have more respect for this grandstander if he hadn't folded to McCarthy in June of 2023 at critical time when we had to hold the line on budget spending caps.

23
My2SonsAreMarines 23 points ago +23 / -0

2 counts 4 mos. each to serve concurrently. Therefore 4 months on the can total like Navarro. He wi lappeal to the full DC circuit (which will fail) and then appeal to USSC. They did not hear Navarro. Will be interesting to see if they rule differently since the basis of the case and the exculpatory evidence was destroyed by the J6 committee who filed the original case - and to whom Bannon refused to bend - and who brought the criinmal charges of contempt - which is why he is where he is today.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›