I will go further, they can't create life at all right now. They don't know how to create the sugars, they don't know how to create most of the base components. Even if you ignore that and give them every component they still can't make life. Even if you assemble it for them they can't make life. Think about this, you can give them a single cell, and just let it die, we know it was viable, so just bring it back to life. Surely thats easier than creting it from scratch! THEY CANT because they don't even know what life is! There is 0 material difference between a dead cell and a living one when it first dies. They just know one, replicates and moves and uses energy while the other doesn't and decays.
As someone who worked with NASA and have people I know working in NASA, the views that earth is a closed system with no such thing as outer space. Or that the earth is flat are wrong. Observational science has and does prove that space is real, and the earth is not flat.
If someone is athiest, they have 3 positions on morality. Either:
- Morality is objective and based on biological need for human flourishing (reproduction) which means refusing to have kids, being gay, and abortion, should be considered immoral to them.
- Morality is subjective and determined by the society, and becuase the society as a whole think that the lgbtq movement is immoral, the athiest should agree, or consider themselves immoral based on their own standards
- morality is subjective to each person which basically makes morality a preference. If this is the athiests view then they have no basis to complain about what anyone aught to do. A group of people could appear and decide to kill all atheists and they would have no moral basis for saying its wrong. It would be like saying somone is wrong for thinking blue coolaid tastes better than red.
So basically atheists should not agree with the lgbtq ideology and similar left wing stances but they do because they are inconsistent.
Others still hold onto the belief that people are naturally rational and capable of living without God or religious practices
- That last mindset is enharently flawed for an athiest. How could someone believe people are naturally rational, but also believe people make up these God's and religious ideas and have enough delusion to believe they are true?
Hmm. I don't fully buy that. My neighbor works for NASS as an aerospace engineer (working on robots) and I've worked on lunar projects for nasa this very year. There active plans for lunar lander stuff on the southern moon. There are many other things that are just simply not in the public domain right now.
Hmm. I do know an owner of a cyber security company. He is very conservative x-military most active enough that the local police call him when issues are occurring in his area. I will check with him to see if he is looking for new hires.
Right, there is a big difference between how and why. Science only answers how. For example, Why is the water boiling? Science will conclude that the water is boiling because there's a burner which is producing a lot of heat. this heat is transferred to the pot in which it then transfers to the water. The water reaches a temperature at which the vapour pressure of the liquid is equal to the pressure exerted on the liquid by the surrounding atmosphere and it becomes a gas. This answer is WRONG because this is how the water boils not why. Its boiling because I wanted to make tea.