Whats suspicious? The golfer tape on his fingers? Or the fact you can see his eye socket? Slippery slope people, find more evidence before such a low effort conclusion.

"You can shove your climate crisis up your ass, You can shove your climate crisis up your ass" to the tune of She'll Be Coming Round The Mountain When She Comes

Its not farfetched and should be investigated by civilians since the government is too corrupt. But, we need to keep in mind what a distraction is, and what isn't. Spend some time, but if no evidence presents itself, keep it in your pocket for another time and instead focus not on the noise. We are the side of truth, not gossip, not assumption, we don't spout stuff without evidence just because it fits OUR narrative or fits our biases. We should investigate all news, and if we can prove something is the case shout it to the world but untill then, just keep an open mind and that's for any outcome. We also need to make sure that if we find evidence to the contrary of our assumptions and biases we shout it out aswell. On here I've experienced many downvotes for doing that, but I'd rather get a downvote than allow a lie to spread.

I see. So no. This is any citizen or any legally occupying immigrant. It states exactly which types are allowed.

More info, specifically I am talking about paintings, the purpose used to be capturing reality but then we learned how to take photos. So painting lost a lot of significance from something that could take an upwards of 30 years, to something that could be captured instantly

• Makes sense to me.
• Art had meaning before technology.
• When tech came along it replaced what made Art necessary. Because of that Art changed from a special craft which takes many years to hone a skill, and it went from its importance being the physical subject to its importance being the artist. It lost meaning and was therefore hijacked by those willing to use it as a vehicle for other things like money laundering, and others.

Look at my response.

The funny thing about atheiats who believe this is that they would have to admit that this universe has an intelligent design. And that there would have to be beings that can (through code), see all, be everywhere, do anything. They would exist outside of this reality and could interact with it using an avatar. Essentially, they would have no basis, to say any claim of Christians is crazy or nonsensical.

Anyone got a source on the bill? I wanna read it before assuming the above is actually true.

Was this taken today? I need some info.

You appear to not want real conversation, but instead you are only here to troll.

Unless you get a source I'm going to assume this is fake.

Please read what you post. And if you did please clarify to those on here. They don't mean a hole in space-time. It says directly in the article they are modulating the pulses of light.

At least what I agree with is that evil is attracted to power. It also hides. The best place to hide for evil is in a place of good. Create a anti-human trafficking operation? I bet some of the cabal will money roll it, for a chance at some inside info. Etc. Want to make a child welfare adoption agency? Guarantee some human traffickers and pedos will try to get a position there.

Enlightenment come from within, so you should be asking yourself that question and although you were being facetious, you cannot cum wherever you want since its not physically possible.

Good find

Incorrect her hand passed behind the arm, did not touch it.

This is suspicious only because the video ended so abruptly. Got a source to watch a longer version?

What's up?

You should always do that for everyone and everything.

Funny you say to study my history, as I have been for years building an American history site, using the library of congress for references. You should watch wallbuilders, they give a good breakdown of early American history and not just southern American history which is what all history book teach thanks to a Democrat dean who later became the president and forced the books he wrote at the standard for all books going forward.

• No definitely dont hate him. He wasn't not the best but he was not the worst.
• He should have abolished slavery 100% and not just for the southern states. He was more focused on the union than slavery.
• Let's not forget, the southern democrat party wanted to also nationalize slavery but instead pf abolishing it, force it onto all states. It was only the northern democrats that wanted slavery to stay a state issue. But also wanted states to choose it for themselves as they were being formed.
• Slavery of all kinds is abhorrent.

Telepathy? This could go on conspiracy not here

Why do you hate Lincoln?

Those are are just dark white people./s