1
NOT_ADMIN 1 point ago +1 / -0

Sounds interesting except that almost all testing sites in America used cotton, not nylon.

1
NOT_ADMIN 1 point ago +1 / -0

Do you not understand how Ai works? Or is this a joke?

5
NOT_ADMIN 5 points ago +5 / -0

There is two photos, not two people. I know it's confusing sometimes.

1
NOT_ADMIN 1 point ago +1 / -0

I actually don't know if a plane hit the Pentagon at all since there is no video of a plan hitting it, no eye witnesses, and no wreckage and the first reporter on the scene said there was no plane wreckage. So that really could have been a missle or just explosives.

2
NOT_ADMIN 2 points ago +2 / -0

Could you put "shit post" just to help those that filter content?

1
NOT_ADMIN 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wrong. You use video to say no planes hit, while video shows planes hitting. Here is your biggest flaw. Thousands of people saw pla es hit with their own eyes. People called from pla es trying to warn theor families or did you forget. I know people living in New York who watch as the 2nd tower was hit. You can deny all you want but eye witnesses matter. And if 1000 people said they watch the plane hit, and 4 people on YouTube said there was no plane, and I have family who saw the planes who do you think I will believe? There is truth in all the best lies. The towers were hit by planes. The planes did not take down the towers. The CIA did.

1
NOT_ADMIN 1 point ago +1 / -0

Because it would require a much more thorough investigation, how were they blown up, what kind of explosives, how did they get in there undetected, when was nanite placed, etc. They wanted a spectacle. Something obvious and something noone would deny. The planes caused the towers to collapse. No thorough investigation needed.

4
NOT_ADMIN 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yes it was your fault. ChatGPT finds key words in a sentence and tries to make relevant and coherent responses. You sending a link, does not provide the Ai with any information relevant to the actual link, but only that you Gave it a link. It takes the data you gave it and tried to formulate some coherent on topic sentence. It is not going to be accurate if you are giving it links and expecting it to fetch the data on the other side of those links.

7
NOT_ADMIN 7 points ago +8 / -1

Planes did hit the building, please understand that with every operation there is an operation happening to muddy the waters. Planes hit those buildings, they were also rigged with explosives and the steal beams were cut with thermite. You have fallen for the disinformation campaign set out to muddy the water and discredit those asking the real questions. Why was NORAD told to stand down, why was a simulation happening at the exact same time with the exact same event, why did building 7 fall. How does 3 skyscrapers fall into their own footprins something which only a handful of demolition companies can do. Why was all the wreckage destroyed and the scene scrubbed. How did the engines melt away but the passports remained undamaged. How did untrained pilotes do such maneuvers, etc.

10
NOT_ADMIN 10 points ago +10 / -0

They went after him way more times and much more recently. He has several documentary movies out and well worth the watch. If I ever get cancer and seek treatment, I am going to him.

3
NOT_ADMIN 3 points ago +3 / -0

No one is on your side. Everyone is on their own side. Use political and other figures as tools. If they help your cause. Support them until they don't. Everyone has their own agenda, and some overlap more than others.

1
NOT_ADMIN 1 point ago +1 / -0

Using a photoshopped image always does harm to the message.. just fyi.

3
NOT_ADMIN 3 points ago +3 / -0

Is there an actual bill to read? I'm not taking anyone's word anymore

1
NOT_ADMIN 1 point ago +1 / -0
  • +1for a flag that trolls liberals
  • -1 for a flag that's pro-southern democrat.
2
NOT_ADMIN 2 points ago +2 / -0

Good play on words

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›