5
NadlersPants 5 points ago +5 / -0

I’ve known lots of CEOs that have no security.

Hell, I met the owner of a multibillion dollar cable company at a sportsbar. Just drinking wine and chatting up everyone.

But the CEO of a health insurance company probably is a more dangerous one than most.

Deny a treatment for somebody’s child that results in the child’s death - not long before a pissed off enough parent is willing to do something about it. One smart enough and motivated enough might very well figure out how to find the CEO.

2
NadlersPants 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yep.

Vulcan WV asked the Soviets for help building a bridge after their state government said they could not afford to build it. The Soviets said “sure.”

Within hours of the Soviet representative visiting the area, the US government responded and said they’d build the bridge. This was after the town’s mayor had asked for aid for years.

13
NadlersPants 13 points ago +13 / -0

Look up Marek’s disease in Chickens.

Basically, several decades ago there was a disease in chickens called Marek’s disease. It had a low fatality rate, would kill a few percent of chickens. So they had the bright idea to vaccinate them, but they used a leaky vaccine - one that does not prevent the disease, merely reduces the symptoms of it.

Over the next few decades, the fatality rate of Marek’s disease creeped up to 100% in unvaccinated chickens, and near 0% in vaccinated chickens. But because it is a leaky vaccine, the vaccinated chickens can still spread it.

As a result, chickens that have been vaccinated for Marek’s disease cannot be kept with chickens that have not been vaccinated - the vaccinated ones tend to spread the disease and instantly infect non vaccinated chickens.

5
NadlersPants 5 points ago +5 / -0

Shutting down the whole power grid kills themselves too, assuming it is deep state that does it. The cabal runs on critical systems maintained by remote workers. The FBI would stop working, DHS would stop working. Military could continue, but the civilian parts of the military would be crippled.

As a white hat operation though - maybe that’s the killshot?

2
NadlersPants 2 points ago +2 / -0

That’s dumb. All computer systems are vulnerable to being compromised, which is why you should always be vigilant. There is no magic button because all of these machines and software were developed by fallible people.

Only a few months a serious supply chain attack occurred in the most commonly used linux data compression library. It was caught by a random database developer - not even a security expert, who noticed SSH logins were a little bit slower than they should be.

Fortunately, that one was in the very early stages and was not yet widespread.

Linux by nature is more secure than windows, being open source, but it is not absolutely secure.

2
NadlersPants 2 points ago +2 / -0

If the databases have the DNA of a few of fourth cousins or closer, it’s not hard to figure out once cross referenced with legal documents of all your known relatives. Think about it - you have 12 of his relatives in the database already, you can see from his DNA he is first cousin of this one, third cousin of this one, second cousin of this one etc. It quickly becomes apparent that there are only one or two people it can be.

At this point, pretty much everyone has had multiple relatives send in DNA to ancestry.com, 23andMe, and whatnot. Those orgs turn around and sell access to their data law enforcement, pharmaceutical companies, etc. It’s a rare person out there that can’t be identified by their DNA anymore.

1
NadlersPants 1 point ago +1 / -0

There are many public DNA databases. It’s not hard to pinpoint somebody with the amount of data out there - if you have a sample of somebody’s DNA, you can find out who they are by their relatives that are in the databases.

2
NadlersPants 2 points ago +2 / -0

There are many public DNA databases. You don’t even need an FBI database for that - just some copies of a few public databases is more than sufficient. 80% of Americans could probably be identified by the ancestry.com database alone.

1
NadlersPants 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yep. Depends on how complex of a test you want (like searching for rare gene variants might take a long time and need multiple tests due to false positives), but a test accurate enough to establish identity is not a complex test - it should only take a couple hours in an automated lab (not even a lab with a tech in it).

And they don’t need his DNA itself, just that of relatives, enough to say “this sample DNA is a male first cousin of SuchandSuch, and third cousin of suchandsuch” etc. Then you just cross reference against national id databases, birth records (FBI has all this) and boom you’ve got your person.

Most Americans have enough relatives in PUBLIC (this cannot be emphasized enough, it’s not even secret data it is public data) DNA databases to cross reference like that and establish identity.

4
NadlersPants 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yep. Silver also spiked up to 30 back during the GME sneeze.

Definitely related.

3
NadlersPants 3 points ago +3 / -0

I’m about a third DRSd. The remaining 2/3 spread between Schwab and Fidelity.

2
NadlersPants 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah, that’s a completely preposterous reason, but it probably will fool a few people.

Retail decided to buy 100 million shares at the opening bell? Nothing RoaringKitty could do could cause that.

1
NadlersPants 1 point ago +1 / -0

Other than the opening pump, volume has been deader than a doornail.

Looks like nobody sold.

4
NadlersPants 4 points ago +4 / -0

I added 250 over the past 2 days.

At nearly ~4300 now.

It’s been a fun ride!

4
NadlersPants 4 points ago +4 / -0

It’s not even about particular people becoming rich (while that does happen) it’s more about controlling the economy. More so about keeping people down, preventing them from gaining wealth (and therefor power).

By printing and allocating the money, the government can pick and choose the course of technological development, can pick and choose which industries thrive and which fall, can pick and choose when wealth can be generated and when it must be destroyed.

If, on the other hand, money supply was scarce, the government would not have as much say in that. Industries would develop based on the overall will of the population.

6
NadlersPants 6 points ago +6 / -0

I don’t know about “tomorrow” or whatever, but back when they first drove the price from ~300 to ~40 or so in a day, the speculation was that $40 was the lowest they could drive it down to, that for some reason that’s the barrier.

The lowest price in the past couple weeks has been about $10, or $40 pre split. So we are at an interesting price right now. Regardless of MOASS or what happens next, this is a historically pivotal price.

And I’ve got ~4000 GME shares now, so I’m watching,

3
NadlersPants 3 points ago +3 / -0

I’ve said before - I think a big part of the mRNA vaccines conspiracy, and why different vaccine lots effected people in different ways is that the rich fuckers in the world don’t want to die.

Basically, mRNA tech has been funded by a bunch of rich guys for decades with no return. The instant it became a viable technology, we coincidentally have an epidemic. Perfect time to roll out and test a wide variety of mRNA configurations to find what works, what doesn’t, what’s dangerous, what isn’t. The tech can be used to treat a variety of conditions caused by cellular expression. MRNA “Vaccines” are actually a crap way to even use the tech (they don’t do anything better than a traditional smallpox vaccine), complete smokescreen to get millions of test subjects. In truth, mRNA manipulation can be used to cure a variety of conditions, including cancer and aging.

That it whacked a lot of people in the process was seen as a cute side effect by the people that think there’s too many useless eaters.

2
NadlersPants 2 points ago +2 / -0

I have a few hundred shares, so I’m mildly interested.

Do you have the source on the Trump team market cap 53 billion? I’m curious how they came up with that, my own guesstimate is that it should be worth in the 4-8 billion range, but I’m happy to be wrong.

I do think a share price of 100 is reasonable, though.

1
NadlersPants 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think it’s a decent possibility that Novavax was a legit vaccine, and not in on the killshot (and thus a possibility he was just whacked by the DS to make room for a more agreeable leader).

I say that because the mRNA vaccines were approved almost instantly, and with little testing. But Novavax was made to jump through a lot of hoops to get their shot approved, and at no point was ever recommended en masse by providers like Pfizer, Moderna, JNJ were.

Not that I took any of them, but I did pay attention to which companies got the red carpet treatment and which ones got hassled. Novavax was hassled, and their product not even allowed to be released until the bulk of the vaxxed population had already gotten one of the mRNA vaccines, and then they said if you had already had an mRNA vaccine, you weren’t allowed a novavax vaccine, while at the same time saying you were allowed to get novavax and THEN get mRNA booster.

This was especially noticeable in covid treatments (not the vaccines). There were a lot of promising treatments out there, but they wanted to steer people to take exclusively mRNA vaccines.

1
NadlersPants 1 point ago +1 / -0

The silver market is very controlled - London can fix the price to any value they want. Paper silver outnumbers real silver by almost two orders of magnitude.

7
NadlersPants 7 points ago +7 / -0

I used to work at an emergency management startup, and I can confirm that FEMA uses Wal-mart buildings/logistics in emergencies. During hurricanes etc - this is already a well established process.

I can’t confirm purposefully empty stores though, but if they were receiving payment from FEMA to do so, I bet they would.

by MAGULQ
2
NadlersPants 2 points ago +2 / -0

“Just make me look like Gay Krang.”

view more: Next ›