49
Neutron95 49 points ago +49 / -0

They should have sent out their own boys HS team, who happened to identify as the girls team that day.

7
Neutron95 7 points ago +7 / -0

Women are more likely to make decisions based on emotions rather than facts/logic. That makes them more susceptible to emotion-driven propaganda, which is all the democrats have to offer. Sad but true.

11
Neutron95 11 points ago +11 / -0

Already saw redditards say “I heard he’s claiming to be non-binary so he doesn’t get charged with a hate crime”. The mental gymnastics are impressive!

3
Neutron95 3 points ago +3 / -0

Not really. The CDC qualified that by saying that masks should still be worn by healthcare workers in areas where community transmission rates are “high”… which is just about everywhere.

3
Neutron95 3 points ago +4 / -1

Not surprised. Studies have shown that Covid infection does not introduce the toxic spike proteins into the bloodstream except in the most severe cases. The vaccines send spike proteins all over the body, including the heart.

2
Neutron95 2 points ago +2 / -0

My wife (in healthcare) took the Pfizer booster in early December. Mid-January she started developing a full-body itchy, painful rash. Two months later, it’s still going on with no medical explanation. She wants to believe it’s something she ate. Man, it’s hard knowing things that your loved ones refuse to hear.

6
Neutron95 6 points ago +6 / -0

I believe the same study showed zero deaths in the control group as well, so not taking the vaccines is also 100% effective.

2
Neutron95 2 points ago +2 / -0

After his off-season antics and previous BLM support, I had written off Rodgers. But there just might be hope for him yet.

The standard answer I hear to those questions is "just imagine how much sicker people would get without the vax!" Morons.

3
Neutron95 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yep. I was hesitant to send money, but my shipment from Reliable Rx Pharmacy arrived yesterday (took 3-4 weeks). All in blister packs. I have to assume it’s real, since it would probably cost them more to fake.

5
Neutron95 5 points ago +5 / -0

It is also believed to cure some cancers. Lots of peer reviewed studies out there. But it’s just for horses…

2
Neutron95 2 points ago +2 / -0

Healthcare workers are in a tough spot. Vax mandates are going to be in every hospital now, so if they quit, they are basically giving up their career.

Where it's already hitting hospitals hard is the lower wage, non-specialty employees: Housekeeping, maintenance, receptionists, food service. Those people can go anywhere, and there's nobody out there to fill those jobs. They get paid more to stay home!

3
Neutron95 3 points ago +3 / -0

For someone like that, it's important to point out that this virus exists in multiple animal species now... even wild deer, in large quantities. It doesn't matter if we're all vaccinated... it will never go away.

5
Neutron95 5 points ago +5 / -0

The LD50 (lethal dose to 50% of population) is pretty high (>10 mg/kg), so you should be ok, but man... that's a significantly higher dose rate than any of the trials. Be careful,

7
Neutron95 7 points ago +7 / -0

Your math is off, and that may be a dangerous dose! One tube treats a 1250 lb. horse at a dose rate of 91 mcg/lb (or 0.091 mg/lb). This equates to 113.75 mg per tube!

2
Neutron95 2 points ago +2 / -0

The boomer-hate is probably what took him down. It would be easy for google to point to that as violating the "Respect Others" clause in the terms of service.

8
Neutron95 8 points ago +8 / -0

Haven't studies shown that lockdowns had little or no effect on COVID transmission? All they did was ramp up suicides and drug overdoses.

1
Neutron95 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hence the narrative swing to "We never said the vaccine would protect you from catching or spreading COVID. We said it would protect you from hospitalization and death!"

Except it doesn't.

by BQnita
4
Neutron95 4 points ago +4 / -0

We survived the wake-up. So will they. It's time.

3
Neutron95 3 points ago +3 / -0

Twitter doesn't hesitate to ban anyone they want for any reason. The fact that he's still around makes me wonder.

3
Neutron95 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's not a question of money. There was a period of time when they couldn't make tests fast enough to meet the demand, and patients weren't allowed into hospitals for surgeries or diagnostic screenings without COVID testing. I agree that the tests are inaccurate bullshit anyway, but this was actually a clever solution to a supply problem.

2
Neutron95 2 points ago +2 / -0

The scientific rationale behind pool testing is that they could potentially save test kits. If 10 people's samples are mixed into one test, and that test comes back negative, all samples are considered negative, and they saved 9 test kits. If the test comes back positive, they test them all individually (or in smaller pools) to determine who is actually positive. It's a good idea, but of course, it can be manipulated for evil reasons.

view more: Next ›