4
Ppface 4 points ago +5 / -1

This is a red-herring; 666 is one of the few "banned" SSNs; I think they just use that to mark the form as "invalid" since the form likely made SSN a required field.

3
Ppface 3 points ago +3 / -0

Even most of Charlotte doesn't even care now...

24
Ppface 24 points ago +24 / -0

You may have grounds to prove coercion, but leaving willingly may make for a hard case IMO.

1
Ppface 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't think this has passed yet? Gun shops around me aren't aware, if so...

1
Ppface 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yup, I think that's the issue...I'll keep digging.

by BQnita
2
Ppface 2 points ago +2 / -0

Gonna be real uncomfortable when the real penalties come down...

10
Ppface 10 points ago +10 / -0

I think we’re on the brink of a revolution for true cures. I pray we are.

2
Ppface 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm extremely skeptical as well...but I don't have a good rebuttal for these twitter goons b/c in their mind the cdc is infallible.

1
Ppface 1 point ago +1 / -0

Good info, thanks fren!

1
Ppface 1 point ago +1 / -0

Just asking for help, fren.

2
Ppface 2 points ago +2 / -0

I tried several times myself only b/c I was recommending to friends & family and wanted to be able to affirm that "yes, I have taken it several times". Ez, 0 side-effects, and now have the peace of mind that I killed any squirmies inside me.

3
Ppface 3 points ago +3 / -0

Exactly...furthermore, you're right on this point:

Hey this thing has human cells in it

--oops didn't know that, now I must object

OR worse

Hey, this thing doesn't have human cells in it

oops, we lied

your opinion is invalid because you previously agreed

view more: Next ›