4
SarMega 4 points ago +4 / -0

Ten years ago... 1999-2001 Leftist Labor had the PM position, 2001-2009 Leftist Kadima had it. Before and after that was Rightist Netanyahu. And before that it was back and forth between the Left and the Right. So until 10 years ago, both the American Christian elites bankrolling the Right in Israel and the American Jewish elites (bought off by Muslim oil billionaires) bankrolling the Left in Israel believed in their prospects of consolidating control of Israel. Once the Left despaired of regaining control of Israel and Saudi Arabia (our main proxies in the Middle East), immediately Obama was releasing things blaming Saudi Arabia for 9/11 and sending cash to Iran and Iran proxy Hamas. The plan switched from infiltrating Israel/Saudi Arabia politically, to destroying support for them and making support for Iran and Hamas and BDS a requirement for SJWs espousing "intersectionality".

5
SarMega 5 points ago +5 / -0

This is fake news. Mitah spelled defectively (without a Yud) is Mem Tav Heh. The Greek prefix "Meta" is spelled Mem Tet Aleph. Read carefully from the article:

"Meta is very similar to the Hebrew word for death,” tweeted tech expert Nirit Weiss-Blatt. "The Jewish community will ridicule this name..."

Notice three things:

  • This isn't an actual Jew, this is a Reform "Jew" with a hyphenated last name billing herself as a "tech expert" (she's actually a PR person) saying things to get attention.
  • She says "Meta" is similar to "Mitah", not that it's the same word, they just sound similar... which is a stretch. In Biblical Hebrew you could say it sounds like "she died", and yet, you probably wouldn't because there's already a Biblical Aramaic word that sounds and is spelled the same (Mem Tet Aleph) that means "to reach". Not to mention, Mishnaic Hebrew up until modern Hebrew speakers have already been exposed to many "meta-" loanwords since the time of the Greek exile, it's as natural to them as it is to us.
  • She says the Jewish community "will ridicule". She doesn't say that she knows anyone who has already ridiculed it. Because they haven't, only her.
1
SarMega 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm open to that, but I don't have paid access to real-time data on what % of the float is shorted. Do you?

1
SarMega 1 point ago +1 / -0

"Buy low, sell high" is the golden rule of trading. Nobody is talking about day trading. Short-term trading is very safe, especially if you do something like observe stocks hitting lower and upper resistance points consistently and just buy and sell at those resistance points. It works because long term traders for some reason are content to eat the loss on the way up and on the way down.

2
SarMega 2 points ago +2 / -0

Most WSB people are short-term traders, they're not long-term investors. If you use your principal to enter and exit 100 positions in 100 different stocks, you make more in a year than you would from a single trade. It makes up for capital gains, and if it doesn't work then it's not a big deal (capital gains only on total profit). If you hold the same stock for a year instead of entering and exiting positions, every time it goes up everyone sells off to lock in their gains, and you eat the loss. Then they use that money to rebuy the stock at lower than your cost basis and get 4x the shares that you have. Rinse and repeat, after a year they more than make up for capital gains. Stop holding the bag.

16
SarMega 16 points ago +17 / -1

I don't know what you and OP are talking about. The point of holding the line with $GME was to cause a short squeeze, which FEC meddling prevented from happening by letting the air out slowly instead of all at once. The point was to redpill normies that the game is rigged.

$DWAC is not a short squeeze situation in the slightest. MarketWatch shows 0.01% float shorted, which is a joke--$GME supposedly had an impossible >%100 float shorted. Does Trump need us to get the share price higher? Is there some goal to a rampant speculation pyramid scheme that leaves fellow patriots holding the bag? I don't see an ethical imperative to hold, nor a justification for hedgies to short $DWAC.

I actually see the opposite; hedgies want Trump to get involved in business so that he can't run again in 2022. They want $DWAC to shoot up so they can say Trump started a pyramid scheme and that he profited off his position of power and used his control of social media to get re-elected. That's why it's getting so much coverage in the MSM, when you would expect a media blackout around Truth Social. I believe Trump has purposely baited them into doing this in order to get free advertising for his platform.

The pattern of shooting up and then selling off to lock in gains and then people buying the dip, this happens with all stocks, this isn't a sign that hedgies are shorting it to depress the share price. And it's smart investing for us to sell high and rebuy the dip, why should we eat that loss ourselves? How is it "unethical" for us to sell before a dip? What's unethical is to advise everyone to hold the bag while others cash in. Let the market work.

5
SarMega 5 points ago +5 / -0

By the time they're told to stop doing it, Jen Psaki / the MSM will already have used the "zero adverse reactions reported" as proof the vaccine is safe a thousand times over.

2
SarMega 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's the sentiment analysis AI stuff they're doing. If it's a Leftist media outlet and your comment is "negative", the system flags you as being "hateful" and "offensive".

3
SarMega 3 points ago +3 / -0

King Salman is the one who changed the line of succession to Prince MBS

10
SarMega 10 points ago +10 / -0

King Salman wasn't deposed, he cleaned out the Saudi royal family and jailed the traitors shortly after Trump visited. He's a whitehat.

1
SarMega 1 point ago +1 / -0

Blacks are super germophobic (so is Trump). They also don't want to out themselves as an "Uncle Tom" by not towing the party line that masks work, and get themselves ostracized from their community. Even White people in Liberal hellholes have this same problem.

2
SarMega 2 points ago +2 / -0

Wayback Machine has Cloudflare throwing "Access Denied" errors all the way back to 10/05, and no snapshots before that. Very weird for them not to have a single real snapshot. Archive.is snapshot doesn't let you download the .zip with all the JS files, as if it was also scrubbed. HOWEVER:

https://archive.is/p4QfS

Some genius circumvented them scrubbing the archived snapshots by archiving the JS file directly; hilarious. If they scrub that archive too, DM me and I'll send you the main.js file (it's several MB).

2
SarMega 2 points ago +2 / -0

Great Reset

1
SarMega 1 point ago +1 / -0

/b/tards call themselves /b/tards, /x/tards call themselves /x/tards. Do other boards call them that lovingly? Yes, sure.

4
SarMega 4 points ago +4 / -0

"X-tard", "X-fag", and "X-fagging" are self-deprecating terms from 4chan, they have nothing to do with putting down other people.

2
SarMega 2 points ago +2 / -0

I have good friends that are frost giants and they don't descend from Berglmer

0
SarMega 0 points ago +1 / -1

Weird, because it's Muslims that hate dogs and are programming their footsoldiers to hate dogs.

5
SarMega 5 points ago +5 / -0

They're being incredibly disingenous. "Decline to respond" is a valid response, it doesn't even require an explanation.

1
SarMega 1 point ago +1 / -0

Do biological markers definitively prove biotic origin? What percentage of oil sources have biological markers?

2
SarMega 2 points ago +2 / -0

Bush era they didn't smear all Muslims as terrorists, they smeared Iran's neighbors that it wanted to take over (Iraq and Afghanistan) as backwards sand farmers who could be easily beaten. Then the story changed to, they need to be civilized and liberalized for 20 years so they'll stop clinging to an ancient religion. Then an Iranian propaganda operation managed to install an Iranian asset into the WH and the story changed to, Muslims are wonderful and if you import them they'll kill all the Jews for you and not burn down churches and terrorize Christians.

8
SarMega 8 points ago +9 / -1

It's not illegal to accidentally access child pornography, it's illegal to keep it

2
SarMega 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don't think he would have funded Expelled and let people watch it online for free if he was helping the other side. He was pointing out the SJW mafia in control of science and academia long before it was acknowledged anywhere.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›