I disagree. Trump is sticking to what's important. Even then, he's still generally addressing the questions, but he's prioritizing finishing the prior topic, or reputing a statement that they deny him the chance to respond to.
How many times have they tried to give Biden the last word on a topic?
To be more specific, a Death Note is tool used by death gods, the Japanese equivalent to the Grim Reaper, to "reap" the living. The user must write the name of their target while picturing the target's face in their mind. They can give further directions to dictate how the target will die, but if no further directions are given, or if the directions cannot be followed by the target, the target will die of a heart attack forty seconds after the user has stopped writing. The death god, Ryuk in this case, can only be seen by those who have touched his Death Note. It was a pretty good psychological thriller, so long as you stick to the Japanese productions, and stay away from the cash grab that netflix made a few years ago.
The irony here is that Trump would make a pretty poor Kira if his goal was to wipe out the Democrats, what with the fact that they like to discard their "dead" names and hide their faces behind masks, clown makeup, and keyboards.
To be fair, just because he's on Youtube doesn't mean he's a bad guy. It's not necessarily a good strategy to pull out of Youtube altogether, anyway.
Youtube is mainstream. More people use it regularly than Rumble or Bitchute. By that, I mean, more people who are deep into the indoctrination, and for people like them, while Youtube might have its own issues, it doesn't have nearly as controversial a reputation as alternatives do.
The issue is that the indoctrinated don't need a full on hard press attempt to break their worldview. That's just counterproductive, and it will make them dig their heels in that much harder. They need a softer approach, one that sparks questions or that introduces concepts in a non-politically charged way. The Why Files is a good medium for this, I think.
It explores topics, from the mundane to the secretive to the conspiratorial, in a way that presents all sides. Yes, it provides an argument against many topics that would be good to reaffirm, but if using the WF to introduce a concept that would be hard to digest, then this can be a good approach. The topic is covered in detail in a non-threatening way, and it prompts the viewer to actually think about it.
Aside from that, he's openly distrustful of the government, he regularly encourages hearing both sides out rather than just sticking to the one or to what you think to be the truth, and he encourages actual open mindedness.
I wouldn't say that he's bought out, like Kurzgetagt is, just that he's questioning. He's thorough, and he does his research.
See, the thing is, I could already believe that this is something that Brandon would mumble out, and that Pierre-whatsherface-Le Pieu would try to defend it as if he was actually going to be able to do it.
Best check February of 25, just to be safe!
They would probably be smart to pick Desantis over her. Desantis absorbed more of the Trump base than she did, and if he drops out, they're more likely to go back to Trump than they are to move over to her. I'm betting that she's the next one to drop out.
As it is, both Ramaswamy and Desantis absorbed Trump supporters who probably wanted someone less "caustic and chaotic". Ramaswamy's supporters will likely split between Trump and Desantis with a bias towards Trump, due to Ramaswamy's endorsement, and Haley is going to be left further behind.
The context here is suspect, though. Why use "Pizza shop" as an example here of all places, and of all things?
17 is just a number. Not every appearance of 17 is significant, it's the context in which 17 is used that is significant. It's the same concept here. Pizza is just a food, until the actual context makes it significant.
Whatever happened with the judge-ordered Nuremberg public hearing?
https://therepublicansvoice.com/united-states/public-hearing-for-illegality-of-covid19/
No, we aren't. There are plenty of conservative areas, but Cincinnati, Columbus, and Cleveland are pretty deep blue, and despite most of the state being red, they're the reason Ohio has a history as a swing state, and why, up until recently, we were purple.
This was not a win for Ohio; it's not a loss yet, but the point was to make it harder to allow for constitutional amendments because special interests want to change our constitution for anti-voter id and pro-abortion agendas, and so on. There's a reason the push for this was so skewed and intentionally confused.
When it comes time to vote on those measures, people are going to need to pay more attention and do more research than they did today.
As adamant as you are about telling people to vote no, could your provide your sources for why a no vote is necessary - including the lbgt language that you say is present? Because as far as I can tell, there isn't anything of the sort present, rather, this is what the issue is about, taken directly from the documentation itself:
The proposed amendment would:
• Require that any proposed amendment to the Constitution of the State of Ohio receive the approval of at least 60 percent of eligible voters voting on the proposed amendment.
• Require that any initiative petition filed on or after January 1, 2024 with the Secretary of State proposing to amend the Constitution of the State of Ohio be signed by at least five percent of the electors of each county based on the total vote in the county for governor in the last preceding election.
• Specify that additional signatures may not be added to an initiative petition proposing to amend the Constitution of the State of Ohio that is filed with the Secretary of State on or after January 1, 2024 proposing to amend the Constitution of the State of Ohio.
https://www.ohiosos.gov/globalassets/elections/2023/spec/issuereport.pdf
Is there some pork that's being missed in the full letter of the amendment? If so, then why is General Flynn telling people to vote yes?
While I understand the disgust at the idea of listening to him, closing your eyes and ears and refusing to see what people like him are saying is often times worse than not hearing them at all. That's one cause that allows them to do whatever they want - their enemies refuse to pay attention to them, and so miss the important slips and tells.
Just remember, this is a friendly environment and everyone else is disgusted by him as well. That being said, we need to know what he's saying, because in cases like this clip, he's exposing himself and what he believes in. There are people who believe in him who don't realize that he said this, or who don't realize the importance of what he's saying, who need to be shown the truth of what he stands for.
Who are these people?
No, seriously. I've heard of a small handful of the names listed, but they are a very slim minority. They might as well have asked an AI to create a list of 250 random names for as much worth as this list has. Even if they are real people, not a single one of them is actually important to the world at large; at best, they've just told everyone what content to avoid - if anyone even associates a movie or song with anyone here outside of the likes of Patrick Stewart or Ariana Grande.
I mean, is he wrong?
Is this actually the worst that they've managed to get? How pathetic. He's more or less just stating common opinion, and rather tamely at that.