Now I wonder if the predictions we try to find from proofs are another election cycle away.
Was in an unwitting role. He got shot and killed. He was murdered and is cold and dead now. Innocent people are dying to advance the plot if this is a movie. That's really dark and I want the show to end already.
"We" have been supporting military intervention and concealing information from the public since August.
Wouldnt summoning the messiah by completing the Third Temple just look like summoning the antichrist to Chritians?
Scott Presler has spent many consecutive months in PA registering Republicans. Like non-stop.
This drop is about the only reason I have faith in the Trump 2.0. Personally I feel at the lowest confidence I've had in our guy since 2016. Praying it turns around soon.
Ive started to wonder if Trump is even the protagonist in the Q story. He and many around him really just seem like another Israeli front group at the moment. Is it possible that the real protagonist will rise and thats what will be the most shocking part of the whole saga?
I think its just physically impossible. But I am interested in your conclusion and am open to the possibility that Im not considering some unknown yet important variable.
Force delivered on target is highly dependent on where the target is hit. If he were hit in center solid mass the reaction would have been more what you describe - knocked over. This round, seemingly, only went through a narrow portion of tissue and unfortunately severed vital arteries. Imagine shooting a tin can and it flails wildly while if you shoot a piece of paper hanging it is pierced but hardly reacts.
They did exist. I was unaware until just now.
This entire comment is bullshit.
Im not convinced Kirk was wearing any armor and if he was it was soft armor that wouldnt be obvious and would not ricochet. And if it was soft armor it would have been defeated by 30-06 at that range anyway. If it were rigid conglomerate ceramic armor it would have stopped the round without ricochet but it would have been obvious that he was wearing it. I think the ricochet theory is a no go.
Im not convinced Kirk was wearing any armor and if he was it was soft armor that wouldnt be obvious and would not ricochet. And if it was soft armor it would have been defeated by 30-06 at that range anyway. If it were rigid conglomerate ceramic armor it would have stopped the round without ricochet but it would have been obvious that he was wearing it. I think the ricochet theory is a no go.
And shooting someone ten feet away in front of thousands of people without aiming is just a bonkers idea.
30-06 AP rounds 100% would not pierce one inch thick titanium. 50 bmg is defeated by one inch thick titanium.
Velocity defeats armor. Sub sonic is necessarily low velocity. Ive never heard of low velocity armor piercing rounds.
And rifles that are not designed as "takedown" rifles will badly lose their zero upon being reassembled. Though the rifle could have been "zeroed" and then planted, then broken down after assassination. But if the story is he reassembled that kind of rifle on the roof and then took it down again to run and then reassembled before ditching it then I think we can categorize that as a known lie. Just like Epstein shit.
Also I saw a video that looked like him jumping down to the grass with what very well could have a been rifle wrapped in a garment or towel. It was grainy footage and maybe I just fell for the power of persuasion. Was that convincingly dismissed?
I firmly believe Trump knew COVID was going to happen, knew the jabs were not safe, knew Biden would "win" and was aware of pretty much all the horrible things that have unfolded over the last few years. But it literally cannot happen any other way.
At 0:19 seconds there is an anomaly. I dont think it means A.I. but thats what people are talking about.
Right. The vast majority of homeless people are homeless because they have life-destroying addiction issues or are so mentally ill they cant get a job or take care of themselves in any way. Leaving people on the street of either status is anti-compassion and dangerous. It costs society more to leave them alone than to force treatment.
The company i work for has spent $10,000 to replace broken store front glass in the last 4 years. They piss and shit all over the place - it's not only a health hazard its expensive to clean up. They've caused TENS OF THOUSANDS of dollars worth of damage from vehicle break-ins and stolen property in our parking lot over 4 years. They go through the dumpsters, throwing hundreds of pounds of trash into the parking lot and I have to clean it up. Its awful. Years ago I had an older vehicle that ran great with low miles. It got broken into constantly though. They kept jamming stuff into the ignition and smashing up the steering column. Pulled what i could from junkyards to repair the column but eventually could not find parts anymore. My car was basically totaled from break-ins. They must be removed from society and at this point I dont care what it costs because it already costs me plenty.
Yeah i don't think this is for the stated reason.
Les Wexner also has extraordinary ties to Epstein. Like unbelievable ties.
Also, the home that Wesner purchased was a home the Obamas rented for the home in as a summer retreat over a decade ago. The Obamas never owned it.
"187" is the police numerical code for murder.
I think Trump will be the last president of the U.S. as we know it.