What are you quoting? Definitely not Q.

https://qalerts.app/?n=88

I like this one a lot shrug 🤷‍♂️

Then again I liked Fall Out Boy before it was cool.

https://truthsocial.com/@WATCHER222/109020898591749699

Trump retruthed this 9 month old post yesterday. Watch til the end.

You can see that he retruthed it if you scroll down on his profile https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump

Edit: apparently this was already sticked, but didn't notice based on the title.

Careful... "Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Says He Couldn't Be Happier for His Son to Marry Former CIA Officer Amaryllis Fox"

https://www.townandcountrymag.com/society/a21945631/bobby-kennedy-iii-amaryllis-fox-wedding/

CIA knows people are trusting them less and less, so it would make sense for them to push at least 1 candidate pro-IC and one anti-IC to hedge their bets.

Hopefully RFK Jr. isn't their limited hangout.

If I was RFK Jr. and if I truly believed the CIA killed my family I wouldn't let any CIA agent within 100 miles of my children.

I haven't heard anything from him in years. I think he was banned from some platforms.

What's everybody's thoughts on this guy? Legit? Mossad/IC? Good/bad?

The Sergeant–at–Arms is subject to removal by the House or by the Speaker, pursuant to clause 1 of rule II.

https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GPO-HPREC-PRECEDENTS-V2/pdf/GPO-HPREC-PRECEDENTS-V2-3-3-3.pdf

The sergeant denied AT LEAST SIX requests for National Guard troops prior to the 6th. Pelosi could & should have fired the sergeant at arms for refusing to keep the Capitol safe when they knew a million people would be there.

So... don't watch the water?

I still think it would be awesome if Sidney Powell ended up being the real Durham. She has certainly done a good job at making it look like she isn’t.

She was in the same room with Trump, Flynn, and Patrick Byrne after the election and they even discussed naming Powell a special prosecutor. Trump had the power to do so simply by saying it.

Where was Sidney Powell born? Durham, North Carolina.

I think I agree, but it would probably affect Trump more than DeSantis. I'm not sure exactly how it was calculated, but I read Trump got $2 billion in free exposure in 2016. I remember where MSM (I think it was Fox but can't remember 100%) showed an empty Trump podium for like 15-30 minutes rather than showing one of Bernie's speeches after a primary.

This was before Bernie exposed himself as a Democrat cuck, election-rigger-endorser, and fraud.

To me the important takeaway is that if we "get rid of money in politics" it won't do what we think it will do. It will only give more power to media companies, search engines, and other gatekeepers.

"Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Says He Couldn't Be Happier for His Son to Marry Former CIA Officer Amaryllis Fox"

He wants a pardon for Assange. That’s more important than any amount of trannies on beer cans.

Are you kidding? Trust me I'm no Tucker apologist but did anyone expect Tucker to show a bunch of images of Hunter's cock?

Tucker's Tony Bobulinski interview was one of the most important interviews of 2020, and that was a first-hand account verifying that the contents of the Biden laptop were true.

For old games like this I would recommend gog.com because there’s no DRM

I finally played it a month ago. Still holds up. Great game.

I can't vouch for every name on your list. I've had doubts about Flynn and others as well, but I'm not sure how connected they are to Trump anymore.

Nunes, on the other hand, was chosen to be the CEO of Trump's social network Truth Social. This makes me trust him more than others. He didn't have to go on X22. He did anyway.

It’s possible you’re correct, but how sure are you that this will result in the best possible future?

Imagine if the US said “we refuse to build a nuclear bomb,” and then Nazis built it before we did, nuked NYC and DC, won the war, and became the de facto leader of the world like we are today?

Outlaw it until we have a plan in place

Perhaps, but if we continue with my analogy that would be like outlawing the US production of nuclear bombs during WWII.

Out of all the conversations I've had with leftists in the past few years, I think I've only had one or two of them not make shit up about my beliefs.

If we are to assume that they treat others how they want to be treated, be sure to include plenty of ad hominem attacks, straw men, and red herrings in your conversation.

AI is coming whether we want it or not. The question is who will control the AI.

Imagine if during WWII US regulators said "hmm sorry but you're not allowed to develop nuclear bombs." This wouldn't stop the nuclear bomb from being built. All it would do is ensure that our enemies had nukes and we didn't.

Or if you prefer a different metaphor, think of this like a "gun-free zone."

"There is no evidence of widespread cheating."

Hard disagree. A little righteous indignation can go a long way. It would be very easy to make Kimmel look like the bad guy here.

K bye

I don’t know what you mean by that, but either way if you send one more disrespectful comment then you’ll be blocked.

You think I’m E? Hard to be upset at your “faggot” comment when you’re an idiot.

Lmao says the dude who has no idea who E is while responding to a 3 month old thread.