Holly trees I read somewhere and they do keep leaves year round
need sauce. thick, red and meaty preferably
while I fully support this concept, something tells me this might be a DeSanctus move to aid and abet a FF to appear to make an argument for gun grabbing. let's hope not
Kitler is an ACTUAL NAZI?
I haven't followed or looked to see, so please explain specifically how he is an ACTUAL NAZI and what the definition of a NAZI is in reality or in your opinion. thx
I was gonna suggest this could be result of a face lift. is this what you are postulating?
FWIW, I also do believe there's at least one Biden double/doppleganger...and have speculated Jim Carey
best 13 seconds of Truth maybe ever!
this broad is into Jesus and homeschooling, so hard for me to dislike her. perhaps Thibault is a double agent or somehow a white hat. either way she seems to know that it will be revealed soon. if he is a white hat and she has to be on the outside a bit this may all be confusing to her even though she may feel she knows deep down that he's one of the good guys
ha, hopefully not! it was supposed to be my own and it didn't require a gun, kek
I took quite a bit out of Citizens Bank :)
let's hope they are compelled one way or the other. isn't this required by court order?
why do we think it was taken down?
sauce from a trusted source, kek
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/03/28/business/france-bank-raid-tax-fraud.html
any truth to Catturd dox? I don't much care. Catturd will have redeemed himself in my eyes even if the allegations are true, with all the redpilling he's doing through comedy
pfft, now how could they know that in the moment or earlier that day she didn't revert to identifying as a she/her or some other LGBTQHFGUDGIOUDYIOD?
Gender fluid NYT, say it with me, Gender fluid
from the article, although still not sure what the "recent filing" is:
"This recent filing by Durham was designed to have two effects. First, and most important, he has now made any decision by the president or attorney general to dump him much more difficult to undertake. The last time a president fired a special prosecutor who was making significant progress, he lost his presidency."
this post it turns out is what I saw
https://greatawakening.win/p/16amU1qM8z/-jim-jordan-said-he-is-working-t/c/
exactly! what does this refer to? the alleged poll numbers or something else?
let's hope it was a squeeze to get the rats running all the while exposing themselves to white hats surveillance. and I trust when the time is right the files will be released
it shows as a new story on JustTheNews website I believe. and perusing around last night I came across a story where Jim Jordan (I think) mentions Durham with new charges. something tells me there's more to this than meets the eye
I do recall that some things came out that weren't part of the case or at least the judge didn't allow them to be. perhaps Durham filed a new complaint for matters that weren't tried. I went on Solomons twatter and lots of people saying this is old and no reply yet from John to elucidate, but he just doesn't seem that type to recycle and not have double checked his work
current Solomon tweet: https://twitter.com/jsolomonReports/status/1640399179741642765
old article: https://twitter.com/southerntails1/status/1640460176162451457
so why the heck is JustTheNews posting this article now?? strange for sure. and written by John Solomon who is pretty solid usually
yeh all seems old but don't specifically recall the text chain quoted. do you?
this is it copied and pasted:
"Jim – it's Michael Sussmann. I have something time-sensitive (and sensitive) I need to discuss," Sussmann texted Baker on Sept. 18, 2016, according to the new court filing. "Do you have availability for a short meeting tomorrow? I'm coming on my own – not on behalf of a client or company – want to help the Bureau. Thanks."
the applicant in FISA can play the same plausible deniability unless they acknowledged the available exonerating evidence in FISA case (that Steele Dossier was junk, etc, etc), as is the case with Bragg. if Bragg acknowledges and reviews the exonerating evidence he knows there's no case
there's a lot of politicians and influential types that have been beating this drum. seems we need to look at that in a much different light based on this bill
I can't figure this one out. if they "posed" as antifa than with what purpose? did they want video later showing that "antifa" breached the capital? are they part of a white hat operation to show that the J6 committee was a jooke and the persecution of the patriot J6ers was a setup? not sure how dressing as antifa supports the cabal/left/crime syndicate, but open to theories