3
SorosOrMuskPickOne 3 points ago +3 / -0

Peter Thiel doesn't produce losers. He backs certain people's careers for a long time and they reap in the end. I'm sure they're getting stock or getting set up for sweet VC or PE director roles by 30. He backed Vance early too.

3
SorosOrMuskPickOne 3 points ago +3 / -0

There's never any sauce for these memes. The list of people always changes to include the most recent celebrity that died before their time, and then they get reposted on X as if they're news. You'd think just once someone would think to ask why no one wrote anything down, made backups, or even told someone anything about what they were working on.

3
SorosOrMuskPickOne 3 points ago +3 / -0

Oof at least half of Russian money is actually in Switzerland. Bold move. At this rate, Russian oligarchs will have to beg Trump for investment sovereignty...which has to be the point.

1
SorosOrMuskPickOne 1 point ago +2 / -1

What in the AI shit is this?

1
SorosOrMuskPickOne 1 point ago +1 / -0

Putin's terms don't match the US's. We're setting the tone, not Russia. Zelensky is willing to part with Donetsk and Lugansk, otherwise the US wouldn't be involved at all. Trump isn't dumb, and he's sticking his neck out for a deal Ukraine agreed to.

3
SorosOrMuskPickOne 3 points ago +3 / -0

I think it was the satire story about Michelle Obama still getting paid to maintain the WH garden. The author didn't realize it was a joke at the time, hence the delete. https://greatawakening.win/p/19AdzDRltG/doge-found-out-that-m-obama-was-/c/

Some folks just refuse to read the article...

3
SorosOrMuskPickOne 3 points ago +3 / -0

Just to clarify the deal, tell me where I'm wrong please. Donetsk and Lugansk go to Russia; Kursk and Novorossiya stay in Ukraine. Ukraine doesn't join NATO; Finland and Sweden stay. A permanent buffer zone is created, but policed by essentially NATO. America gets mineral rights including the buffer zone and funds business development for those, but refuses to fund further military actions. Is that right? Basically Russia gets two regions and no NATO for Ukraine, and keeps Crimea?

2
SorosOrMuskPickOne 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's what they voted against. They voted for independence to negotiate. A good sign but no one wants to be a US territory. Being a US territory doesn't help the people of Greenland anymore than being the Danish territory they are now. Giving them independence is important to make them a successful partner.

2
SorosOrMuskPickOne 2 points ago +2 / -0

5/6 parties in the last election were pro independence, the only disagreement was the timetable. The winning parties are tracking 3-5 years

1
SorosOrMuskPickOne 1 point ago +1 / -0

Gotta ask who benefits most from continued fracturing. Ukraine would know their IPs would be traced. I think this was China once again.

2
SorosOrMuskPickOne 2 points ago +2 / -0

This was the Left's mistake with Trump

1
SorosOrMuskPickOne 1 point ago +1 / -0

This feels like China. They know how everyone will react against their preferred antagonist (US Deep State, Ukraine, Russia, Israel). They are exploiting our fractured politics.

1
SorosOrMuskPickOne 1 point ago +1 / -0

Look we both have no idea why Pam Bondi was selected after Gaetz. But it has to be relevant that she's seen more about the Epstein case than anyone. I have no concern that the files will be released, but to think that Trump wouldn't consider Bondi's role in the first trial seems supercilious. We've had the Epstein contact list since 2015. There is a role for the public, and given the facts it's not incredulous to call her on a statement that she was somehow "fooled" into thinking she doesn't know more.

Acosta was appointed by Trump too in his last term, and was the person to approve a federal non-prosecution agreement on Epstein. You can take both of these appointments as collusion, or as a strategy. This is a plan, and Trump has elevated the people who helped keep it covered up twice now.

I'll post what I think with sauce, and you do the same, and we'll both be drawing attention so we both win.

2
SorosOrMuskPickOne 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm not deep but there are definitely ways to short BTC using ETFs https://www.investopedia.com/news/short-bitcoin/#:~:text=It%20is%20possible%20to%20short,can%20also%20generate%20significant%20losses.

In general, it still coincides with how liquid people want to be, as it's still speculation-based. When some people are nervous about their own finances...they invest in stuff that is less volatile or maybe save money for a rainy day (ie they're selling). Bitcoin is now a very popular investment, which always attracts a balance of opinions, and right now the market is being driven by people being more careful in the short term. Lots of people still view crypto in general as a short term investment. All trading right now is more conservative bc of potential tariffs...not that they are the wrong longer term move.

I personally think that was Trump is doing is going to stabilize Bitcoin, and make it viewed as a longer term investment, since the government now has skin in the game, but that's not financial advice.

I know this isn't a complete answer, but I think this warranted at least AN answer

9
SorosOrMuskPickOne 9 points ago +10 / -1

I think it's important to keep pressure on Bondi since she was the one who allowed the Epstein case to be holed in 2015 when she was Florida AG. Public pressure gives Trump additional leverage over her as well. Kash, however, is still new to the case in his role.

I'm still of the belief that the public also has a role to play here

5
SorosOrMuskPickOne 5 points ago +5 / -0

"The Cloud" turned out to just be other people's computers. AI is just other people's search results.

view more: Next ›