Hardly.
Misinterpreting a value system does not make the misinterpretation the guaranteed end result of the value system.
You have to misinterpret dozens of simple words and dozens of Bible verses to end up where we are now.
That has nothing to do with some inherent and inevitable outcome as a result of Christianity itself.
Nietzsche was a fool.
Let's not forget the part where Jesus let them kill Him, so they could have the chance to go to Heaven the same as you and me.
People are taught in public school that America is a dictatorial empire that is crumbling before our very eyes?
I think you've misinterpreted my meaning, fren. It's about the parallel.
People are waking up to the fact that we are Rome and we are falling. They are starting to see the parallels. We've been sitting here for years saying that there is a shadow-cabal ruling the world and that America is dying because of it, but only now do people see it. And for normies they are comparing it to Rome.
Sure, the parallel may not have been perfect, but I think it's still valid.
The normies must be shown. Is that not why Biden is president? Is their awakening not exactly what we've wanted all this time? They may not know it's the deepstate, but they don't need to, they just need to hate whatever it is enough to not complain when Trump comes in with the military to execute the deepstate demons and reveal the truth.
I'd say it's more along the lines of a Great Awakening (heh) of normies to the ideas we are presenting; the fall of an empire (and the fact it is en empire).
Many people saying they think about Rome because there's a stark contrast between the Roman Empire and the American Empire.
The MSM correctly reported the fact that Biden won the electoral college. Doesn't change the fact they cheated and it was all invalid, but the MSM controlled nothing, they simply reported on what the deepstate who controlols them orchestrated.
Where in the world is the gospel not preached? Where in the world is Jesus Christ not known?
And fighting the cabal doesn't change the fact we are all sinners in need of a savior.
Good thinking. Too many good shitposts to name any one post "shitpost of the month".
There are two options, the Bible or evolution.
In both cases, the narrative is nonsense.
We either used to live 900 years like in the Bible, or we are evolutionarily predisposed to living long and healthy lives, as that would be massively beneficial for a species that operates the way ours does. The ability to pass down knowledge is invaluable, and to have a whole tribe, including many strong males, raising the offspring would ensure the survival of the species.
So the notion that evolution would only account up until the species had kids is overly simplistic and silly. As if a species that gave birth and then routinely died of the plague 5 days later wouldn't get naturally selected into oblivion.
I'm just befuddled that the guy who dared ask if he was vaccinated got upvoted.
Cool, because that's what his logo is. Similar.
Every single letter is different. All it has is a square period at the end.
And looking him up as a Young Global Leader turns up this: https://nypost.com/2023/04/19/dont-use-my-name-vivek-ramaswamy-tells-world-economic-forum/
Could be a trick to make him look good, sure, but it also might not be. He could have just ignored it, figuring most people wouldn't look or care. It certainly looks good from the outside and exactly like what we'd want to see.
Also, according to that article, Putin is a WEF Young Global Leader. Are we to believe he isn't going against them right now, and it's all a show? Seems like they're desperate to stop him,
I mean, I'm not going to vote for the guy over Trump, but I find it strange that GAW of all places simply shits on him with seemingly no substance. Maybe it's there, but I haven't seen it yet. Just, "he's bad" or maybe "he's bad because [tenuous unsourced claim that makes him sound like someone we would dislike]".
The Al Sharpton question being oh so bad just sounds like confirmation bias to me. "He's bad and this proves it!" How many people on here were idiots when they were 20? So many people get duped in their youth only to wake up later. It's not like he's some 60-year-old lifelong democrat that rammed through a bunch of horrible policy initiatives, who then just suddenly decided to become a republican. He's the typical college buffoon who wakes up once he gets out of the echo chamber and into real life. At least that's what we see from the outside.
The best argument I've seen from a logical standpoint is that he seems like an Obama 2.0. But just because it's logically plausible doesn't mean it's true.
Anyway... Trump 2024.
Ignore the people who yell shill at anyone who isn't an expert.
Also ignore the FUD and read the due diligence to determine what to do.
Interesting. Was considering an "anti-fiat trifecta" of sorts consisting of a precious metal (silver), a stock (GME, and recently BBBYQ. Was also looking at AMC, hence how I found myself here), and a crypto. Only problem being, I don't know which crypto to get into.
Trust is earned. This is how one earns it.
Disregarding the constitution because we don't like them and because they're evil would most certainly not be a better optic.
Speedy trial, swift execution.
With mass cheating by the Dems? I'd say they should have won even more seats than they already had after 2020.
Almost like someone stopped them ;)
But certainly, without cheating, we'd have won many more than we did.
I agree. That's my point. Or at least the point I was trying to convey.
To clarify: The first sentence was facetious, and the 2 questions were rhetorical. And the final question was directed at the people who always accuse us of saying to "vote harder to beat the cheating".
By "fuck us over if the plan is 2024" I meant not vote, and by vote harder I was trying to turn their term back around on them. Because I suspect that most of the people talking about not voting will end up sucking it up and voting if that's what the play appears to be, come November.
I guess Chris Paul gets it better than Trump and the military...
Who fortified 2016? How did we win seats in 2022?
Question for anyone whinging on with the vote harder rhetoric: If Trump's plan is to get elected in 2024 and nothing happens before election day from the military, what will you do? Fuck us over? Or vote harder and trust Trump and the military?
It's not up to belief, assuming you mean Gab not having as much reach, it is simply fact.
Gab is not as popular as Twitter. Neither is Truth Social. Normies flee from these places because they're brainwashed, and the content repels them. If Twitter became Gab but with more people, the same thing would happen. All the normies would be repelled and would just go somewhere else.
And frankly, if these normies went from their current life to shit hitting the fan and, upon deciding to look to gab for answers, saw a bunch of shit about Jews, they'd probably run from there too. I wouldn't be surprised if a certain subset of them just killed themselves at that point. They're not going to listen to a complete 180 from their current beliefs just because shit hits the fan. It needs to happen slowly. That is the whole point of Biden needing to be president. We can't tell normies, we have to show them, and that's slow.
That isn't evidence, it's a hypothesis.
Maybe more bots are being deleted revealing the true engagement numbers. Maybe these people aren't as popular as they once were for other reasons, and it just so happens to have coincided with the new CEO. Coincidences DO happen, the problem is when coincidence is the explanation for everything, not when coincidence is applied properly and considered as a possibility.
And let me guess, not every conservative has had decreases in engagement? No, it's some of them experiencing this, and the ones who aren't are still spreading plenty of truth.
For example, BioClandestine is frankly an Elon shill. He sings his praises all the time. And despite constantly posting content revealing the truth in Ukraine and Russia, he hasn't complained about engagement as far as I'm aware.
Some people also just like to play victim and cry, even on the conservative side. And did the new CEO censor these accounts on day one? But maybe I'm just reading too far into "since she took over".
And meanwhile, super-based shit is trending daily with people on both sides posting about it. Usually people revealing truth and good insights vs the crazy lefties crying about trends.
This Twitter bad shit is a fantasy, at least right now. Time will tell if it will actually go bad, but currently it's a straw grasp to claim Twitter is firmly bad or even good. I'd say it trends good, but at worst it trends bad. There's no hard answer.
These aren't small victories. They're the kind of victories the cabal goes ballistic behind the scenes over, wondering how the fuck they let it happen.
Some things are black and white. Many things are, even.
Most times I see people pushing the "things are gray" shit is when they're trying to dispute this fact.
Not everything is gray, just like not everything is black and white.
So if you have an issue with someone applying black and white thinking to a certain scenario, you're going to have to explain why you think it's more nuanced instead of just bitching about it. Assuming you want to actually have a productive discussion, that is.
Gab is great, but still doesn't have the same reach as Twitter.
The people who need to see certain info are the same people who would leave instantly if such info all came out at once and was talked about.
So when it comes to normies, Twitter is what it needs to be to most effectively feed them truth after so many years of brainwashing and lies.
Evidence that vax and election stuff is being throttled and not just people posting "NI**ER NI**ER NI**ER NI**ER NI**ER NI**ER NI**ER"?
Deleting info is one thing, and while deleting the other also isn't adhering to free speech, it is hardly the end of the world in comparison.
What normies would stick around to see the vax info or election info if their timeline was filled with that shit anyway? They wouldn't block or mute, they would just leave when all the valid Jew posts, invalid Jew posts, and/or actual racist shit become common place.
This is why the theory is not well established.
It tries to claim that variation is proof of speciation.
But the problem remains, as you point out, that there is no good evidence of any new genetic material, which is a hard requirement for the entire thing to work.
Also, one big problem with the first cell, at least from what I've heard, is that it couldn't have happened with oxygen due to the chemical reactions that would occur. Even if life could exist in its primitive form without oxygen, at what point did oxygen appear for life that needed it to exist? If trees make oxygen, and humans make carbon dioxide, both would need to exist together. How could they simultaneously "evolve" without each other to make them work in the first place. This seems ridiculous and a big reach.
The only possibility I see is that at one point either animals or plants were able to output O2/CO2 without an input, which is ridiculous.
And why delete the public DOD webpage that explicitly outlines and confirms their existence one day after some random Twitter anon figures out the link between Russia’s missile strikes and the labs?