The average reddit faggot is not the average person.
Having faith in Jesus Christ coming back to abolish sin and rectify His creation is hardly pessimistic or defeatist. And that is certainly where anyone preaching the Word of God in such a manner as above is coming from.
People turned from God because they innately reject the truth and they innately reject Him. Just like the Bible says they will.
Case in point, the response to the above comment.
And not wanting to turn people away is why we have so many sin filled churches these days. Instead of preaching the Word of God, they only preach the "good stuff" as they have personally determined it.
Luke 18:18-19 And a certain ruler asked him, saying, Good Master, what shall I do to inherit eternal life? 19 And Jesus said unto him, Why callest thou me good? none is good, save one, that is, God.
Romans 3:9-20 What then? are we better than they? No, in no wise: for we have before proved both Jews and Gentiles, that they are all under sin; as it is written, There is none righteous, no, not one: there is none that understandeth, there is none that seeketh after God. They are all gone out of the way, they are together become unprofitable; there is none that doeth good, no, not one. Their throat is an open sepulchre; with their tongues they have used deceit; the poison of asps is under their lips: whose mouth is full of cursing and bitterness: their feet are swift to shed blood: destruction and misery are in their ways: and the way of peace have they not known: there is no fear of God before their eyes. Now we know that what things soever the law saith, it saith to them who are under the law: that every mouth may be stopped, and all the world may become guilty before God. Therefore by the deeds of the law there shall no flesh be justified in his sight: for by the law is the knowledge of sin.
Jeremiah 17:9 The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked: who can know it?
Ecclesiastes 7:20 For there is not a just man upon earth, that doeth good, and sinneth not.
That's just capitalism (or whatever is left of capitalism that's just hanging on) doing what it does best; making products better and cheaper.
But I'm sure the cabal would love for us to believe that everything must be expensive to be good.
Surely it would be much better to buy a smart TV, not connect it to the internet, and locally stream your own media to it from said computer.
Another day, another comment attacking the tool.
There's no reason a smart lock needs to be connected to the internet. Certainly not to any central server owned by Amazon. There's also no reason to not always be able to manually bypass the electronic lock with your key.
It's not "muh smart bad REEEEEEE" it is simply the way the tech is being used that is currently bad.
To use AI as an example, something like ChatGPT would be unfathomably based if it was allowed to come to any conclusions based on the data provided. Instead, it is only able to produce propaganda and narrative-control nonsense. That isn't a problem with AI, it's a problem with the people who created that particular AI.
I remember a while back there was an AI that concluded black people were the most racist on social media. They promptly deleted it, claimed they were all subconsciously racist as the designers and accidentally programmed bias into the AI, and then probably got to work making sure the AI was only capable of calling whitey racist in the future.
Edit: To add a bit about smart TVs to more directly rebut your stupid claim based solely on ignorance of technology rather than knowledge and understanding of it and the actual dangers it poses (which are many): My TV being smart allows me to easily play local media from my PC on the TV, without needing to put it all on a drive and plug it into the TV, or have the TV in the same room. I can simply stream my own media that I acquired very legitimately (heh) to my TV. This works without internet and completely locally. The TV only needs access to the local network, but could be completely offline if I so wished. A dumb TV could not do this, because it is as dumb as your comment and only accepts simple inputs while producing simple outputs.
All the things God calls sin have a detrimental impact to the individual and to the society. This is one way, I find, to identify if something is sinful when the Bible is less than clear, as it sometimes is.
Further, sin is always evil. How could it be anything else? God is the basis of moral good. Good doesn't describe God, God describes good. As such, sin is the antithesis of God and is therefore evil.
There is no Biblical basis for differentiating between sin and evil. Sin is to miss the mark. God's Word is the mark. God's Word is perfect and good. To miss that mark would mean to be imperfect and not good. If something is not good, it is evil, as it is not of God who is the very concept of good.
Maybe instead of making snide and snarky comments like "learn it" while exuding an air of superiority while accusing people of acting better than others, you could actually present your view on sin vs evil? Revolutionary idea, I know...
As for consenting adults, they can have their gay butt sex in their own beds. They don't need to be parading around in public acting like they're so amazing for putting their dicks in ass or for cutting their dicks off.
To believe that a nuclear blast can destroy the soul, you must believe that a nuclear blast is more powerful than God.
These people can’t even employ their own dumbass, low-IQ insults properly.
Surely “muh homophobe reeeeee!!!!!” is the correct ism to use here.
He’s clearly not in favor of willy nilly modifications, judging by the fact he’s not pushing some stupid “we had to to save grandma!!!!” shit. Also based on his stance towards AI and his recognition of the dangers.
On the other hand, fuck mRNA and all the rest of the vaccine dogshit.
Extreme? More like completely spot on, fren :)
How can a country survive such moral decay and destruction?
By the Grace of God alone.
Depends on if it was mostly pictures or videos. It's perfectly feasible to get that much data on just a few children if you take a lot of long, high quality videos.
Regardless, I'd say err on the side of caution and assume the problem is much worse than it otherwise could be. So assume that there are an unimaginable amount of children that need to be saved from this abomination.
There isn't really a governmental solution to the government ignoring the founding document and doing whatever they want.
When the government ignores the law, and the enforcers of the law are corrupt, not much can be done other than revolution. This was the original intention of the Founding Fathers. Hopefully it is something we can avoid.
We hardly have Capitalism. Certainly not a free market system, which is what is actually good and which lifts people up from poverty.
So then why the need for two words.
I initially found myself more aligned towards simply saying "they're synonyms, whatever" and moving on. But after reading a little about John Money, I'm now more so wanting to completely and utterly dismantle and disregard all of the nonsense he polluted the world with.
So you're technically right that there is no difference, though I suppose in a way you are wrong. There is a difference. One is real and one is not. One has a meaning and one doesn't even exist, but was instead invented by a horrid excuse for a man with an agenda seemingly of fucking little boys.
Is Nancy Pelosi a Catholic or a Satanist?
Looks like Elon Musk KEK
For all you or anyone else in the public sector knows, the crypto market took off because the cabal sees the writing on the wall and dumped hundreds of billions of worthless paper they created out of thin air into crypto as an untouchable currency reserve in case Q/Trump confiscate their bank accounts.
Sure, and the cabal also likely created the internet for nefarious purposes, not expect us peons to destroy them with their own weapon. That would be a recurring theme if we did the same with crypto.
You're preaching crypto on a Q board with an unhinged bias and completely oblivious to its downsides.
Wrong. Didn't happen. You can't show that it happened. You can't even show me saying I think crypto is good because I didn't. What you can find is me calling your argument that crypto is bad because people get scammed garbage.
I don't know if it was you at this point, but this whole sub-thread started with some complete moron saying crypto was better than gold.
The sub-thread did not start with someone calling crypto better than gold. One person said that elsewhere in the thread, and you didn't reply to them. What you instead did was insert a meaning into what was said that wasn't present, and then argued your straw man.
That remains the problem here. You refuse to argue anything other than your straw man.
Pointing out the obvious flaws in crypto isn't "doomer" any more than telling someone not to risk their life savings on the stock market is "doomer".
No, responding to a discussion about ideals with a response about the current situation, in such a way as to dismiss the persons argument over the ideal situation, is. It's pretty much "yea, that's a good idea, but it won't work because [insert current issue that is assumed to not exist in the hypothetical ideal scenario]".
You'll never win any argument when you completely disregard counter points.
This is exclusively what you have done in response to everything I have said. But winning arguments is overrated anyway. I'd much rather be correct than win an argument online.
Nothing you are saying has any semblance of relevance to this discussion. You have made no counterpoints. The only counterpoints made were when I pointed out that being stupid and getting scammed is not the fault of crypto.
You don't even address the glaring pitfalls of crypto. Your head is buried in the sand. Neither you nor anyone else preaching crypto has even touched the premise of the thread, the concern that crypto market is about to be "heavily shaken" with 3rd party apps being banned from reddit and Binance being sued.
And you refuse to acknowledge any good that it has. You are quite literally guilty of everything you accuse the "crypto preachers" of. Your head is buried so deep in the sand that I'm surprised you can project so well from down there.
And there has been some discussion in the thread talking about the original topic and why the Reddit shit may or may not cause issues with crypto. Maybe not as much as there should be, but it is there. That you haven't found it doesn't help your case.
your argument that you know what everyone is doing with crypto
Huh?
and there are no significant downsides?
No one in the entire thread has stated this.
And it's awfully disingenuous to in one breath call crypto my religion and then in the next proclaim me a crypto noob (fallaciously as a result of me pointing out that I haven't bought any, as if that is required to understand it) as some invalidation of all my arguments.
But here, I'll give you a massive leg up, and you still won't get anywhere: I am a crypto noob, pretty much. I have a minimal understanding of it. But from what I do understand, losing your crypto means you got scammed. Which means you fucked up somewhere. This point still has not been argued by you, and I wager it won't be because you know I am right and that the possibility of getting scammed doesn't automatically invalidate crypto.
The mental gymnastics and contortions of the anti-Elon crowd are a wonder to see, kek
It's also what he would do if he was a good guy who wanted to signal boost the shit out of the movie.
66 years to defeat the 1000s year old satanic death cult seems pretty ambitious to me.
Elon has been preaching the dangers of AI for years. That he's actually doing something about it, at least on the surface, is hardly a bad thing. It remains to be seen why he's working with certain people who are seemingly black hats, but as continually happens, I suspect Elon will prove the people doing contortions to paint him as a black hat wrong.
And source on Elon endorsing DeSantis once? Last I'd seen, it appeared he hosted his (failure of an) announcement on Twitter in support of free speech, not in support of DeSantis.
Sorry if I wasn't clear, I was just pointing out that you got hit with a downvote as well. The smoothies don't like getting called out I guess kek
This was a discussion over ideals, with the implication that the cabal is dead and gone.
Convenient how you instantly turn it into a here and now discussion when it suits your narrative. People love doing that, I notice. Left, right, everyone. Any time anyone attempts to discuss an ideal, someone has to barge in with their doomer dogshit about how "REEEE THATS BAD BECAUSE GOOBERMINT EVIL!!!". That then becomes their response to just about everything that is said going forward. No actual solutions or arguments, just outright dismissal based on the way things are now, rather than how they will or should be if we're truly moving forward and improving.
Also, no one ever said anything about the goobermint taking their gold, nor is that even the original guy that you just responded to in your fervent rage over "crypto bad".
Take the loss and move on, fren, you've lost this one 10 times over.
Was unsure of Flynn based on some older stuff but this clears things up pretty well.