Take a joke, geek.
https://youtu.be/qCxLTn6TNaA?t=156
Taken completely out of context. He is clearly talking about the European way of power and how such has clashed with the American idealism. It was also clearly not at a Bildergroup meeting, lmao.
Judge can still acquit regardless of juror decision if they fail to meet a reasonable burden of proof.
Gematria aligned with my life has pointed towards messages that Yellowstone will be targeted with an explosive device to set off a series of events that will likely lead to that which is biblical
Mandates not being laws, however, is a valid point that relates to the current obstruction imposed upon OSHA by the federal courts.
As John McAfee shared... the deep state is largely embedded within these very agencies, such that the laws passed have enabled these agencies then create hundreds of thousands of regulations
This is no democracy, but rather an autocracy.
Congress was the target points to the fact that this legislative body has been what has fueled such, and likely where voter fraud has been largely occurring to ensure that their agenda remains.
The executive authorities have been molested through judicial case law that has interpreted the Constitution and delegated authority away from the states and brought it into the broad scope of what policing powers have been determined to include, as well as what might pertain to interstate commerce.
I think you fail to recognize that the FDA approval meant nothing because the FDA-approved vaccine is NOT available within the United States. The only vaccine available is the Pfizer-BioNTech one that was reissued Emergency Use Authorization. Pfizer says these two can be used 'interchangeably' however such cannot be the case as both are different legally and in their delivery mechanisms.
If they were truly the same thing then there would be no true justification for only reissuing an EUA for the vaccine being used. If an FDA-approved vaccine was available, such would also be true that all other EUA's be rescinded.
I do not believe the company making the claim that they can be used in place of one another is based on any legal foundation to support that argument that anyone could make a EUA product compulsory.
I wouldn't believe that Project Veritas would have not been prepared for this scenario. It seems like such would have been predicted as highly likely considering the lengths the FBI has gone to serve political interests and further point towards their own inherent corruption.
I wouldn't be surprised if the phone was providing a means of geo-locating its own coordinates to monitor where it might have gone.
How do you ‘legally’ inject/make public/use as evidence?
Chain of Custody
Sometimes 'intrusions' have a way of safeguarding people & evidence.
Sometimes 'intrusions' are a necessary event in order to safeguard chain of custody [post OIG WB status + doc handover protocols].
What's up with images being such low quality
I believe it'll be Jenn Psaki.
She might be PR-Executive-1 and Q brought her up with Huma in posts referring to NOV.
https://qanon.pub/?q=Durham#4952 Nov 13 2020 00:20:55 (EST) Durham. Q
Is November 13th, 2020 showing us a marker for 5:5 in the timestamp?
What was Q's last drop? A song called We're Not Gonna Take It that came to be released in 1984.
April 27, 1984
What else happened on this day? http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/april/27/newsid_2502000/2502565.stm
Libyan embassy siege ends The siege of the Libyan Embassy in St James's Square in London is over. In the end, the diplomats, holed up in the building for 11 days since the shooting dead of WPC Yvonne Fletcher which began the siege, simply walked out.
She was killed on April 17th, 1984
Yvonne Fletcher is back in the news as the Scotland Yard has submitted over 600 documents regarding this case and their continued pursuit of justice and answers
The trial raises the prospect of a a senior Libyan official, Saleh Ibrahim Mabrouk, becoming the first person to be brought to justice for a murder that shocked the nation.
Mabrouk was arrested on charges of conspiracy to murder WPc Fletcher but no charges were brought after the criminal inquiry was dropped in 2017 on grounds of national security.
Marbouk has denied all wrongdoing, pointing out he was in custody at the time. Mabrouk was expelled from the UK after the criminal case was dropped, preventing lawyers from dragging him to the High Court to give evidence. He is now living in Libya.
Remember these unforgettable words...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qxa-hd12Wjg
Obama is a son of Africa H1N1 was created by an unnamed military Set up a tent on Donald Trumps' estate
Coincidences? How do these things come together?
How are you that oblivious? I worry about people like you.
Calling her a sexist slur (which I use myself) without *actually reading and comprehending *the SC case is just absurd.
She operates by the rule of law and values integrity in what it means to be a Justice. She did not say that she 'disagreed' with the merits sought by the applicants, but rather that the use of an emergency docket that lacked the formal proceedings of a SC case was not the platform to instill decisions that could be used to force the court to have similar assessments.
Full briefing and oral arguments means we get to assess the justifications of the SC on both sides.
There is a reason they added their consensus, rather than choosing not to. The SC case did not make any determination about 'religious freedom' nor did it even say that Maine is particularly violating their constitutional right by failing to provide the means of applying for such exemptions.
Sorry my set of beliefs do not align with yours, but to call me a 'leftist' is laughable and only indicative of your ignorance. I value dialogue that is reasonable and productive, not jabs that lack any substance and only serve to provide material evidence that some of us here lack character and class.
As I pointed out, Follow the Pen. Can't make threads here because moderators do not like me or because I call out racism, sexism and bigotry when I see it.
My father is friends with him. Not a grifter. This is somebody that has been highlighting issues long before 'Q' being a public operation. This is somebody that is close w/ Team Trump. Nothing else needs to be said. Those that say that he hasn't provided any 'inside information' fail to recognize that the vast majority of these individuals have not provided information that would suggest what is happening according to the plan, as was intended. Those that say they have direct and confirmed inside information are grifters.
https://qanon.pub/?q=comms#1713 Direct comms come in many different forms.
8/2/2019 ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION TO SEAL PLAINTIFF'S "RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS FILED BY DEFENDANT SUB JUDICE" IS GRANTED*. PLAINTIFF'S "RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS FILED BY DEFENDANTS SUBJUDICE" IS TO BE FILED UNDER SEAL PURSUANT TO FRCP 5.2(D). SIGNED BY HONORABLE CYNTHIA M. RUFE ON 8/2/19.8/2/19 ENTERED & E-MAILED. COPY MAILED TO UDODI. (fdc) (Entered: 08/02/2019)
Let's dig
https://qanon.pub/?q=violence#4739
https://qanon.pub And lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from the evil one." - Matthew 6:13
https://qanon.pub/?q=peace#2440 WE STAND FOR GOOD. WE STAND FOR WHAT IS RIGHT. WE STAND FOR COMPASSION. WE STAND FOR FREEDOM. WE STAND FOR PEACE. WE STAND FOR LIBERTY. WE STAND FOR JUSTICE. WE STAND FOR EQUALITY. WE STAND FOR PROSPERITY FOR ALL. WE STAND FOR RELIGIOUS FREEDOM. WE STAND FOR HUMAN RIGHTS. WE STAND FOR LIFE.
Do you think what is 'good' is advocating for death that negates the process of law? Does the liberty, justice and equality that we seek for ourselves then not apply to those we 'think' are evil?
This is a movement that is not advocating that type of thought.
Sexist identified who can't read
Have you even read the case? Do you understand how to interpret cases?
I hate to say this, but you are an imbecile.
Sexism isn't cool, nor is it any component of the Great Awakening movement.
This is good news, and the interpretation of this was taken out of context.
Barrett & Kavanaugh essentially argued that the decision to approve the application could serve to be misused and force the court to take on cases it would otherwise not be involved in.
The 'emergency hearing' is not similar to that of a normal SC case, as they describe it lacks full briefing and opportunities for oral arguments.
They do not infer that religious mandates are constitutional.
This does not impact any States that have prescribed methods of pursuing a religious exemption, nor does it provide merit to revoke such methods.
It doesn't even really address the real subject in that which is surrounds the reason for the denial, which was given to their discretionary approval.
The case itself should be read, which includes seeking relief that would come from the acknowledgement that 1) Maine is violating federal and statutory rights by not allow religious exemptions and 2) Several healthcare providers are breaking the law in enforcing this...
Does that sound like 'relief' that they can grant from something without a full briefing? Without oral arguments?
To imply a scope that would include every state that doesn't have religious exemptions and vindicate healthcare providers?
Bigger cases to come than this one.
I got my religious exemption from one of the major universities in Southern California.
Working on mine for the flu shot, too. Shouldn't be too difficult, as the religious exemption doesn't require that your particular belief system be 'exactly' identical to that which is sponsored by said religion.
You are entitled to your own interpretations, thus I would expect that your interpretation might reflect the common core beliefs centered around the idea that your body is an embodiment of your own 'temple' and that you, as a consenting adult, can decide to opt out of as you believe yourself to be perfect and holy as you exist as an embodiment of Christ.
The Congregation for the Doctrine of Faith (CDF) published something called "Note on the morality of using some anti-COVID-19 vaccines," which does state that vaccines must be voluntary and that the only exemption to this moral conflict would be one that would be caused by an 'uncontrollable' spread of the virus with no means of control, which is not applicable to neither COVID-19 nor the influenza strain. Continued use of PPE, maintaining social distancing protocols when possible and practicing good hygiene will continue to substantially protect you against the virus.
99% of these Telegrams are LARP accounts.
What an odd world to live in where viewers are financially incentivized to watch content.
I'd prefer platforms that aren't incentivizing the youth to choose a screen over the outdoors.
Haven't seen any issues with inventory in California
It's really nothing special, and it is actually standard. For example, Brett Giroir was a former four-star admiral in the U.S. Public Health Service Commissioned Corps despite having no actual military background. It's just a title.
Forcible doesn't apply to cases where one is 'coerced' into having to take it to avoid other barriers