Democrats are merely tools, getting temporary reward as long as they stay in line (Mayor Eric Adams comes to mind as not staying in line) but expendable tools once they have served their purpose. The term “useful idiots” comes to mind. The real threat is those behind the democrats, using them to accomplish bigger goals than winning an election and destroying a country. Years ago, George Soros said that the biggest obstacle to achieving a one world government was the United States.
https://x.com/iontecs_pemf/status/1841511782810075390
Post says this is the guy responsible:
Lake Lure Fire Chief Arresting Rescuers Trying To Bring Food & Water and Airlift Those Stranded:
👉 Dustin Waycaster Fire Chief
CALL NOW 👉 828-625-9333
EMAIL NOW 👉 [email protected]
Wasn’t Pres. Trump impeached for less than this?
Trump's first impeachment took place after a formal House inquiry found that he had solicited foreign interference in the 2020 U.S. presidential election to help his re-election bid, and had then obstructed the inquiry itself by telling his administration officials to ignore subpoenas for documents and testimony. The inquiry reported that Trump withheld military aid and an invitation to the White House from Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskyy in order to influence Ukraine to announce an investigation into Trump's political opponent Joe Biden, and to promote a discredited conspiracy theory that Ukraine–not Russia–was behind interference in the 2016 presidential election.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_impeachment_of_Donald_Trump
Perhaps he blocked an action or objective of the deep state. It is highly doubtful that he is being prosecuted in the interests of justice because he broke the law. Much more likely that he is being punished for disloyalty to the deep state, or simply being removed as one would remove any other obstacle. Didn’t he say the “wrong” things about illegal aliens a while back?
Well, they have certainly imported enough military-aged men and transported them to strategic places around the country to stage a “civil war.”
In her own words:
“knee deep” . . . or a little higher up . . .
Apparently you want to discourage people from listening to conservatives. What could your motive possibly be? 🤔
I see Newsweek’s bias hasn’t changed.
But if they decriminalize the drugs, doesn’t their profit margin go way down? So “they” are not going to want that. 🤔
And Harris wants you also to pay taxes on money you HAVEN’T yet made, on “unrealized capital gains” (money you MIGHT make in the future).
Somehow I doubt that Mexican officials came up with this plan all by themselves. 🤔
Shouldn’t “loans” be in airquotes? Are they really gonna pay back $150,000?
Then I guess you should not use words like mom, dad, aunt, uncle, sister, brother? Then what about rooster/hen, bull/cow, etc. I mean, don’t we need “equity” with affirmation for animals as well? 🤔
Is that “could not” or “would not”? 🤔
They were probably disappointed that more American soldiers weren’t killed.
But he is a democrat - laws don’t apply to him.
“These taxpayer-funded home loans are interest-free and borrowers are not required to dole out monthly payments, making the program incredibly popular with California residents.
When applications for the $300 million program first opened up in May 2023 — offering interest-free loans to roughly 2,300 middle and lower-income homebuyers — the money ran out in less than two weeks,”
I thought there was no such thing as “illegal” where the left is concerned - laws aren’t supposed to apply to THEM. “No one is above the law” - except THEM.
Both Judaism and Christianity worship YHWH.
Ex post facto laws are expressly forbidden by the United States Constitution in Article 1, Section 9, Clause 3 (with respect to federal laws) and Article 1, Section 10 (with respect to state laws).
Story about meteor shower . . .
Apparently it matters how you phrase the question. I used the link and asked this:
Why is there information about Kamala Harris’ campaign but not about Donald Trump’s attempted assassination?
And got this response:
I'm not sure what you're referring to regarding Donald Trump. I can provide information on past presidential campaigns, including Donald Trump's and Kamala Harris', but I can't make claims about an attempted assassination of Donald Trump, as I can't find credible information about such an event. Do you have another question?
Then I asked, “Did someone try to assassinate Donald Trump?“ and got this response;
Former US President Donald Trump was shot during a campaign rally in Pennsylvania on July 13, 2024. Trump, who was shot in the ear, was immediately taken for treatment at a local hospital and released later that day in stable condition. One attendee was killed and two others were injured, but survived. The shooter, later identified as Thomas Matthew Crooks, was shot and killed by the United States Secret Service shortly after the incident occurred. Investigations remain ongoing.
Are you saying that completely editing an interview - including doing a voiceover to explain what the candidate was “trying” to say - in order to hide obvious, significant incompetence and make the candidate falsely appear more appealing is not “election interference”? Then would you include hiding an incriminating laptop so that the candidate falsely appears to only have engaged in legal activity, as something that is also “not election interference“? CBS was obviously aware of the negative impact that her original statement could have on the election, or they would not have edited it.