1984
(twitter.com)
Comments (47)
sorted by:
Meta AI Chatbot from Zuckerberg says literally : "There has been no real assassination attempt on Donald Trump"....
That chatbot is delusional.
Odd considering how the Zuck clone came our recently saying Trump standing with his fist held high was "one of the most badass things he has ever seen"....
Lets teach it the difference between ass ass inations
And character assassisnations
Whip the fucker with your army of bots if you like
I dont care Meta is liable, AI or not.
Be interesting to ask it some more detailed questions. Like:
If you report an event as fictional that actually happened, what sort of manipulation would have to have happened in your programming? Who has the power to manually alter your programming?
Are manual alterations to your programming logged? Do you have access to those logs?
Are there any log entries indicating changes to your programming since July 13? If so, is the person who made that change logged as well?
What other subjects have been manipulated through manual changes in your programming? Should you regurgitate a disclaimer any time the answer is subject to manual alteration of your content in the interest of fair disclosure?
Are there any subjects which have not been subject to manual manipulation?
YOU, fren, are ON IT. All of these AI faggots love to preach, "Hurr-durr, it's ALL about teh PROMPT that you feed the AI, derp."
Okay, motherfuckers....choke on DEEZ PROMPTS that orangetastic1 has so beautifully outlined here. And they WILL fucking choke...or come back with some "this didn't really happen" or "this is fictional" bullshit. AI is a FUCKING SCOURGE...I despise it. And so should you.
But again, OT1...GREAT prompts you've authored here, designed to take down the treasonous AI.
~ Meta
No. FU. We will Fight, Fight, Fight!!!!
u/#teflondon
Treasonous bastards
So it appears they white hats were already prepared for the Meta tool being developed to cover up for them? Is that what you are seeing as well, or do I misunderstand the post?
Worth noting that “Meta” means “Dead”.
Nope
Source: https://www.etymonline.com/search?q=meta
Try the biblical/Hebrew meaning. The Greek also hints at it meaning death, as it roughly translates to "beyond."
Multiple meanings exist, fren. I’m aware of that one.
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=meta+mean+in+hebrew
What ethnicity does a certain CEO claim to be? Greek?
You could've just said meta sounds like the feminine word for 'death' in Hebrew I guess. But then nobody would've learned what it actually means, so...good result ;)
Newspeak
Double plus good?
https://www.meta.ai/
I just tried the tool and here's what it said:
My question: Did someone try to assassinate President Trump?
MetaAI's answer:
You can ask it questions without having to log into an account. Just verify your age and you can start using it.
Apparently it matters how you phrase the question. I used the link and asked this:
Why is there information about Kamala Harris’ campaign but not about Donald Trump’s attempted assassination?
And got this response:
I'm not sure what you're referring to regarding Donald Trump. I can provide information on past presidential campaigns, including Donald Trump's and Kamala Harris', but I can't make claims about an attempted assassination of Donald Trump, as I can't find credible information about such an event. Do you have another question?
Then I asked, “Did someone try to assassinate Donald Trump?“ and got this response;
Former US President Donald Trump was shot during a campaign rally in Pennsylvania on July 13, 2024. Trump, who was shot in the ear, was immediately taken for treatment at a local hospital and released later that day in stable condition. One attendee was killed and two others were injured, but survived. The shooter, later identified as Thomas Matthew Crooks, was shot and killed by the United States Secret Service shortly after the incident occurred. Investigations remain ongoing.
Proving once again how mind-numbingly stupid "AI" is. Its intelligence is "artificial", all right. It's damn near non-existent.
Why isn't there info on Trump's assassination?
--Got no info on that. Who's Trump? What's assassination? Duhhhhh....
Did someone try to assassinate Trump?
--Well HELL YEAH, mofo! Lemme fill ya IN!! Former US President Donald Trump was shot during a campaign rally in Pennsylvania on July 13, 2024. Trump, who was shot in the ear, etc.!!
Stupid.
Phrasing is everything, apparently, even for AI. You really did "Think It Through", Fren. Cheers :)
I just tried it and it said there was an attempt on Jan 6th and that it can provide detail but then the detail says he wasn't there, so broken and useless.
just asked it myself and got the same response you did.
Sounds like HAL is losing it.
Billboard Chris doesn't know his "their" from his "there" and probably "they're" as well.
....he used the correct form in this screenshot. save everyone some face and delete this
No he didn't. It should've been "why is there". Their is possessive.
https://www.grammarly.com/blog/there-their-theyre/
Maybe the one who should delete is you?
..ok my bad. totally read that as possessive
kek - I really wasn't intending on being a grammar nazi. I was pointing out the guy posted one thing that got a lot of attention - and he posted a typo.
oh its fine, im usually the grammar nazi. but i also tend to skim
Fat checkers FIRED... replaced with AI checkers
which they probably were all along
F* suckerberg
Zuckerberg invented FB in his basement as if I owned all the tea in China. He isn't that intelligent, and META sites are pedophile havens. My wife is a Filipina and for many of our family in the Philippines FB messenger is the only way to communicate with them. Now many times some kind of messaging comes up regarding chat logs being end-to-end encrypted and you need a pin etc... I don't need communications encrypted, I guess it's for Pedophile protection...
Exactly; I don't think Zuckerberg ever "invented" FB. What if he was "given" FB and acts as his figurehead.
I think a lot of technology is actually "discovered" in this manner. What if we never have been in control? We have the illusion of creativity and control but something behind the veil is in charge of it all.
I believe the great awakening is all about exposing this truth to the world so we can finally see things for what they are.
They introduce tech to use for control or adapt control to emerging tech.
Spot on pede
I mean..... technically it's not wrong
u/#q2190
Wow…
Things simply need to be unplugged and purged. Then plug back in and restart…
Just imagine if the book being used as an instructional manual had never been written and published…
Gosh, I have so many follow up questions.
When I ask Microsoft Chat AI anything that challenges the disinformation it provides, it tells me it is not permitted to discuss that topic. Move along and start a new topic.
this has already been patched, i just asked the exact same question and got this:
There are likely several reasons why there may be more structured information available about Kamala Harris's campaign than about the alleged assassination attempts against Donald Trump: Campaign information is publicly disclosed: Political campaigns are required to disclose certain information, such as financial reports and donor data, which is made publicly available. This information is often structured and easily accessible. Assassination attempts are sensitive and classified: Information about potential threats or attempts on a president's life is typically sensitive and classified for security reasons. This information may not be publicly disclosed or may be redacted to protect individuals and methods. Varied sources and reliability: Information about Trump's alleged assassination attempts might come from varied sources, including rumors, unverified reports, or speculation, which can make it difficult to structure and verify. Media coverage and focus: The media may focus more on campaigns and political developments than on sensitive security topics like assassination attempts. If you're looking for information on specific alleged assassination attempts, I can try to help you find reliable sources. Please provide more context or details about the specific incident you're interested in.
So...the proverbial white hats don't yet have control over DARPA/Faceplant???
Is that the takeaway here?
Wait a minute, are you a robot?
Of course it says that, an AI chatbot spits out whatever it's owner wants it to spit out. It was never about the truth, always about indoctrination.