2
Voight-Kampff 2 points ago +2 / -0

I understand that the accused was not back in class after the arrest. Was in class after the allegations and during the investigation. Law enforcement instructed the school to not reveal the investigation to the accused.

1
Voight-Kampff 1 point ago +1 / -0

That sounds like slavery, but withOUT the extra steps.

2
Voight-Kampff 2 points ago +2 / -0

If a foreign agent can purchase the data, themselves or via proxy without penalty, then why shouldn't the NSA, DEA, FBI, YOU, ME every 'Merican be able to purchase?

2
Voight-Kampff 2 points ago +2 / -0

May of '98 was the Thurston High shooting. July 4th, 1998 I was at the big community fireworks show, wearing a long duster type coat. Walking through the crowd noticed the big police presence and realized I was getting attention and why. Decided then that crowds were not a place for smart people.

3
Voight-Kampff 3 points ago +3 / -0

It is generally accepted that money equates to speech politically. Not sure how that all plays in here with the 1st amendment.

https://rumble.com/v3cqj3f-man-attempts-to-withdraw-cash-from-the-bank..html

1
Voight-Kampff 1 point ago +1 / -0

Here, we'll put this up for auction on the world stage to any power: how much is the US Fleet of carriers and all associated air assets with trained personnel worth? Nothing?

The correct answer is well more than you can imagine.

1
Voight-Kampff 1 point ago +1 / -0

He did run to convention in 80 against incumbent Carter, then did not run in 84.

4
Voight-Kampff 4 points ago +4 / -0

I want to make sure this is at least said out loud once.

IF there were dark/rogue government forces involved in the assassination of JFK, then they would have been fucked if RFK became President.

How would they have stopped him? He was stopped by someone, wasn't he.

Do you see why Teddy didn't run?

RFKjr better have some top down assurances on things.

0
Voight-Kampff 0 points ago +1 / -1

You want to have a gold standard? You better be able to stop every army in the world from getting to your gold.
That is the point.
There is not, nor ever was a "gold standard". It has always been, and will always be a hot-lead or violence standard.

1
Voight-Kampff 1 point ago +1 / -0

Woosh!
(That may have been the sound of valueless, not-real F22's or UAV's or an advanced warship, or Space Force. )
You want to have a gold standard? You better be able to stop every army in the world from getting to your gold.
There is not, nor ever was a "gold standard". It has always been, and will always be a hot-lead or violence standard.

-5
Voight-Kampff -5 points ago +1 / -6

Whatever you imagine this "something real" to be... you will have to be able to hold it against hostiles taking/destroying your "something real."

Maybe a military of some sort could protect your "something real"... you'd need a functioning society that could sustain both value of "something real" and the security structure to wield it.

To bad there is nothing real backing the US dollar, eh kid?

4
Voight-Kampff 4 points ago +5 / -1

IF YOU WANTED TO HAVE A FUCKING PURPLE REVOLUTION HE MAY HAVE BEEN IN THE WAY?

Prince = Purple
His Band = The Revolution.

He sued everyone that touched his intellectual property.

2
Voight-Kampff 2 points ago +2 / -0

Hulk's entry music is solid to this day.
If Trump came out to rally with "I am a real American, fight for the rights of every man"...

1
Voight-Kampff 1 point ago +2 / -1

17:00 pm all fireworks in your yard

15
Voight-Kampff 15 points ago +15 / -0

It is a contextual error- that is the wrong word.
Accusation is the correcty word.

view more: Next ›