8
Wayshuba 8 points ago +8 / -0

Once again, where in the Constitution does it give Congress the power to create government? Secondly, under the Acts that created DC for the purpose of being an independent district in the US, does Congress have the power.

If you are now saying the Federal Government can reside in a state, then Maryland and Virginia should just take their land back.

2
Wayshuba 2 points ago +2 / -0

Another scenario to consider. Texas, and many states who joined them, also challenged the legality of the election. If one of these states decides that they are not going to be involved with the illegal placement of a President, secession is a very real possibility.

I also believe if one state takes this course, there are going to be many more that follow suit very, very quickly. They are not going to stand for a Communist government destroying the US Constitution as the states are only in the union with the agreement the Constitution is followed.

If that happens, and once that ball starts rolling, it will be too late for the military then as the states that secede take their citizens (and military soldiers) with them. This possibility could happen much, much faster than the military is ready for as their already talks of many states talking about taking up a vote to secede.

I will also say this, when 100s of thousands of people start losing their jobs because of Biden's dictatorial orders, I believe the powder keg is going to ignite. After all the blatant trampling of our rights in 2020 and now massive election fraud, a lot of Americans are at the breaking point.

I guess what I am ultimately trying to say is, I don't think the military has the time they think they have unless, of course, they are on board with America's descent into communism.

3
Wayshuba 3 points ago +3 / -0

Technically, the military is made of from citizens of the States. DC is not a state but an entity on to itself.

One thing people may want to bear in mind is the people that committed this treason are not the only worries. Perhaps the military is working to make sure the are first decoupled from their global masters so as to make taking them out much easier.

5
Wayshuba 5 points ago +5 / -0

In Lincoln's time you didn't have the globalists with their claws in the US, so all he had to worry about was preserving the union.

This time, we have been heavily infiltrated by traitors in our government that are deeply entrenched and on the side of the globalists - willing to sell out their own country for a spot in the NWO.

We need to pray that the military is in fact going to uphold their oath and save the country but, unfortunately, it is going to be done on their time schedule.

2
Wayshuba 2 points ago +2 / -0

Because if they did it under Trump, the military would be acting under a legal President on US soil and would therefore be much more limited in what they could do.

Now, with an illegitimate President in the White House, placed in concert with foreign powers, the entire government has become belligerent and now the US Military, under the US War Code has an obligation to remove the legitimate government and facilitate the installation of a new, legal government.

That is our last hope. If the military fails now, then the American Republic is done as we are quickly descending into full blown communism. Once we reach that point, the pain will really begin because no nation is going to allow a communist nation to hold the reserve currency of the world and our nation will literally economically collapse overnight - similar to how the USSR did.

Then again, that is exactly what China wants, to remove the US as a superpower in the world.

Let us hope that the military brass still takes their oaths seriously and have not also become traitors to their own nation.

7
Wayshuba 7 points ago +7 / -0

The military does not swear an oath to the CiC. If military has the proof the CiC is illegitimate, they are not going to consider him a commander.

The military is sworn to defend the Constitution from enemies foreign and domestic. If concrete evidence exists that this election was worked in concert with foreign powers (which we know it does because of sworn affidavits in Italian court) then domestic actors (most in the battleground states) are considered traitors and that puts it completely in the purview of the military.

3
Wayshuba 3 points ago +3 / -0

A Vet posted on these boards that it is a taunt to the enemy, they remove their hat to show they are not a women. It is not a mark of respect.

What little I looked into this, I came across how this came from the custom at the time for a man to remove his hat and slightly bow in the presence of a women when first meeting her or when at formal engagements.

This basically transferred to the military in the tradition of calling the enemy a bunch of women.

Either way, what little research I did basically shows it as not only a sign of disrespect, but an actual taunt to the enemy.

Go back and watch the Trump inauguration and you see the RG Captain lower his lance, and then turn and salute the President - not remove his cap.

2
Wayshuba 2 points ago +2 / -0

Chill. Do some homework and reading on Operation Bodyguard during WWII.

It will help you understand more of what has to go on to make sure this is successful.

9
Wayshuba 9 points ago +9 / -0

I don't know how much stock I would put in this information that they are waiting for Biden's approval rating to drop.

Yes, it is obvious they have all the information by the way they acted towards him at the inauguration. I hope the military has considered all the scenarios here.

State Secession

Many of the "red" states, who could not get their case heard in SCOTUS, are not going to stand for the communist, anti-american behavior of the current Congress or the fraudulent President.

Once it begins, the military is too late to stop it. Remember, every state that secedes takes that military with them. Look how fast states joined with Texas in the SCOTUS case. The military could very much face a scenario where more than half the country is gone in less than two weeks - and with it more than half of the military's capabilities.

Revolution

This one is a more likely scenario even before session. If this starts, it will quickly snowball and I don't know if the military has considered a scenario with tens of millions of armed and pissed off Americans. With everything Americans have been through over the last year (covid scandemic, unconstitutional lock-downs, censorship, fraudulent elections, and now a foreign installed illegal President) how much more do they think Americans are going to take before this goes hot?

The ONLY thing holding most of America back right now is the faith in our military to do their constitutional duty to remove the traitors and restore the Republic to it's legal status. What they need to be more worried about, than civil war, is when conservatives finally break as they feel their is no one is government or the military to stand up to corruption, unfettered lawlessness and blatant treason.

Once the Rubicon is crossed in this regard, they are now going to have to turn on the American People because it will be like a massive wave that sweeps across the US.

Combination of Secession and Revolution

This is a very probable scenario. Red states secede and the red states that are over-run by a democratic city - such as the battleground states this last election - go into revolt so that they can join the red states in secession.

Intention Military Destruction

Expect this to start very quickly. Like Obama, they will move fast to weaken the military and open up the county to favorable conditions for foreign attack. Biden has already given China access to our power grid again.

Civil War

The most likely LEAST of the scenarios. If the military does have evidence of the actual election numbers than they know the majority of voters by a BIG margin went for Trump. Furthermore, those a REAL voters, with REAL guns, with REAL feelings of our government being nothing but a criminal enterprise at this point.

I expect the traitors are going to move quickly to make this happen so that they can remove any push-back from their reign of communism.

Plain and simple, treason should never, ever be a political game of wait and see. This is why we are here today, because these people literally have run roughshod over the Constitution and the military is failing in their oath to protect and defend the American People from all enemies foreign and domestic.

7
Wayshuba 7 points ago +7 / -0

Obama ran a shadow presidency as he operated behind the back of a legitimate President.

The difference with Trump and Biden is Trump is still running the legitimate Presidency while Biden is basically the glorified Governor of D.C. only.

36
Wayshuba 36 points ago +38 / -2

I've always known the story about dying from cancer was BS.

My father and grandfather both died of cancer. You cannot miss the unmistakable weight loss as cancer overtakes the body - none of which [No Name] displayed.

For a more public example, look at photos of Patrick Swayze (who continued to work while he was dying of cancer) or Dennis Hopper for examples.

6
Wayshuba 6 points ago +6 / -0

If you want to see the BIGGEST difference between the two inaugurations that shows you the military is in control.

Trump Inauguration (Go to Timestamp 6:40:30): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1UXYMPTdC40

Notice how the Marine exits AFTER the President.

Biden Inauguration: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bjCLq1X5fXk

Notice the Marine exits BEFORE the pretend President.

You will also notice a HUGE difference in the military parade and watch how the Marine officer at Trump's Inauguration keeps intentional pace with the President and gives him a very strong salute before Trump he gets into the Beast.

I don't know if this means anything, hopefully a VetAnon on here might be able to, but at Trump's inauguration, the Marine escorting the President was highly decorated while the Marine escorting Biden showed no rank or insignia. Does this hold meaning in the military? I am really curious about this one.

2
Wayshuba 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think, if things are are aloud to go on much longer, this becomes a real possibility. The HR1 institutionalized voting fraud bill will probably be the final straw.

4
Wayshuba 4 points ago +4 / -0

Notice the lights went out on the symbol of the NWO in DC....

6
Wayshuba 6 points ago +6 / -0

They first have to find WHERE Trump is.

Q told us at this time he would be well secured in hidden locations.

2
Wayshuba 2 points ago +2 / -0

My opinion has changed since the inauguration.

While the Patriot movement was a little disheartened with Biden swearing in, it has quickly turned again back to a community of hope and support for what is to come.

On the other side of the fence, we still had a lot of people snow-balled by the MSM into hating Trump. Now, they have Biden, even they are waking up that they have been snowballed by the MSM. Many of them, finally realizing they have been lied to, are also starting to look into this 'QAnon' thing.

This period is also meant as a "shock" period - to see how close we were/are to loosing our freedom and everything we hold dear. While this is being done for us, it has also been used to smoke out the traitors to our country (As Q said: Traitors Everywhere) so we can strategically remove the cancer that has plagued our nation for too long.

We actually NEED this dark period in our to accomplish what needs to be done.

6
Wayshuba 6 points ago +6 / -0

The inauguration takes place at the Capitol though, not the White House.

2
Wayshuba 2 points ago +2 / -0

Do you find it coincidental that this party registered only two days after the inauguration?

It's almost like it was part of some plan.

11
Wayshuba 11 points ago +11 / -0

A lot of this is untrue.

First, Trump ordered the NG in under his State of Emergency. Like the state NG, they are called up by the Governors. In DC, it is the President. While they are reserve forces of the Army or Air Force.

Second, yes something is up. But we don't know if it is good or bad yet. The troops in DC have been on record to not have been told what their mission is yet other than a vague - protect the capital. Past experience with military usually means this is a good thing as plans are being closely protected by military brass and will be relayed to the troops when the time is right to execute.

Third, there are a lot of signs right now that are out of the ordinary that something is not right. Everything from Biden having to take a private plane to the inauguration, the anomalies on camera at the inauguration, to the break neck pace of EOs and weird Congressional laws happening.

I hope this means things are going to turn a corner for us and finally our nation will be free again and removed of the traitors. So much of this just seems to much in your face. If it isn't, then we are all in a ton of trouble. I pray it is the former and not the latter as I refuse to believe that everyone in our government and military is that evil.

3
Wayshuba 3 points ago +3 / -0

BOOMERANG!

14
Wayshuba 14 points ago +14 / -0

Sometimes you can't tell people, you have to show them....

Now where have I heard that before?

I guess we are in the show phase now..... these people are going to be thrilled when Trump is back in office.

1
Wayshuba 1 point ago +2 / -1

The earlobes alone can be explained with plastic surgery.

What is better to consider is the mannerisms of the old Biden vs. the new Biden. If you focus on those things, you will notice that this "new" Biden is very different than the "old" Biden.

You will notice one of the "creepy" mannerisms of the old Biden has not been witnessed even once, that I am aware of, with the "new" Biden. That kind of sick habit doesn't go away. Especially with someone in their seventies when it tends to be an ingrained habit by then.

Also, go back and watch some videos of when he was speaking when VP and look at them now. This "new" Biden uses his hands in a different manner when putting emphasis on certain things that the "old" Biden did.

I am not saying this "new" Biden is fake but I am noticing some things about him that just seem out of character for the "old" Biden.

1
Wayshuba 1 point ago +1 / -0

I will be honest, there are some sleight differences between these signatures but, with a little over a year between them, people's signatures do change over time or based on what they are doing. I know my signature has changed over time.

I haven't looked at the EOs themselves, but if is says Presidential Actions this typically means a Presidential Memo, not an Order. All Presidents have issued both.

4
Wayshuba 4 points ago +4 / -0

You want a law reference then here. See (15):

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/3002

It doesn't get ANY clearer than that. It CLEARLY says, in law, the United States is a FEDERAL CORPORATION.

Now, let's talk about that 1871 Act, since we want to get mired in law. Exactly where in the Constitution does it give Congress the power to create governments? Because, as that Act you linked clearly shows, that is what they did and therefore put the Constitution under a government they had no authority to create.

More on this from an attorney: http://www.supremelaw.org/letters/us-v-usa.htm and even more: https://www.serendipity.li/jsmill/us_corporation.htm

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›