The MAGA movement has encapsulated people from all walks of life. Though there are many on these forums who will vocally speak against them, there are many gay and yes even trans people in our corner.
But how far do we have to appeal, exactly? Where the leftists have appealed further, they no longer espouse equality but instead equity.
Any misfit that doesn't feel represented by MAGA at this point may very well just..not want what it is. They may be more focused on equalization of outcome rather than equal opportunities.
Weight aside... That's a man.
...Okay, Biden.
You have my attention.
What skeletons?
Assuming this is true, of course, I view Obama is the bigger fish.
Elon is complicated. He is doing so much right, but some stuff wrong. He clearly has a differing opinion on a lot of things and I won't say that opinion is objectively wrong but there are things I wish he would think through better.
I am pleased overall with what he's doing, but I maintain a distinct lack of trust in basically all humans and that goes for Elon as well.
Elon is, at his core, a businessman. A very smart one, which makes him formidable.
But I will not definitively say that he is or isn't good or bad, white or black hat.
All I will keep doing is praising when he does good, scolding when he does bad.
Reality transcended Babylon Bee satire.
I can feel it cooomin' in the air tonight, oh lord.
They are preparing, they licked their finger and held it aloft; they can feel the winds of change, and know that censoring an incoming President is not going to be in their favor.
Axios is mainstream but possibly outside of your sphere.
As for who controls them now, who even knows anymore.
This seems to finally be the comedy hour of the show.
That is weird.
MSM can't even keep their stories straight anymore.
That's a notable thing and speaks to how out of control their spiral is, I think, because of how much they all parrot almost word for word the propaganda they're told to in order to hit as many targets as possible.
Yeah I don't think a single post I've seen under "probable spam" is spam.
It's not a loophole if it's at the government's behest. Even then I would have to see some very, very old SCOTUS rulings that say that the Constitution does not guarantee protections even when private companies are involved.
We've already seen high profile cases where a ToS is not as binding as these companies hope already, so waiving one's rights have to be more intentional than they'd like.
Plus, I think they would have gone for him over this if they even sniffed a possibility.
As the obvious nominee, I imagine stating intentions and informing the people who would be your peers of the policies should you take office isn't really unusual or unexpected.
Scott and Haley are my absolute non-starters.
Whomever becomes vice president becomes the major successor for 2028, and I will not under any circumstances vote Haley or Scott without a Trump name there.
It could... But it would be a major outlier that warrants suspicion.
In Spain? In July? 100+ degree weather some days?
Must be smugging fentanyl.
It's awful and disgusting, and sincerely should be harshly penalized. That is not only totally gross, it can get people seriously sick.
Human fecal matter is some of the grossest shit (literally) compared to most other animals.
Sorry, I just mean that some people will take that to mean that because X number of people believe Y person is working for white hats means that you can't disagree with that.
I don't buy that Pence is, for example, though some even still remain adamant he is. Which is fine, ultimately we don't know specifics.
I do hope the people playing the bad guys are honored for their personal sacrifice down the line though.
But just because people can come to a conclusion about someone playing a role or not doesn't make it true, and so discussion should never be shut down on the premise of whether someone is good/bad/etc.
How does more than one person have a family emergency at the same time, in the same political party?
Most of us have thought that the change of batter would be successful.
I don't know about that. I haven't thought for one second that they would actually try to do so, because it is legally difficult and by doing so, they risk inciting a wide scale change that removes their ability to act at all.
Sure, it was talked about a lot but most people don't negatively vote on posts just because we disagree with events we don't see happening since we are all on the same side.
And they clap.
You're right, so long as people use good discernment.
It feels like it's been 4 and 80 more.
It's a random woman getting a viral 15 minutes of stupid fame if that's her.
Everything can be distracting without being a distraction.
If people would stop talking about her even in the conservative sphere, she would drift away to obscurity.
It seems like something only someone high off their ass in space could find so funny.
Fink has such an unrecognizable face, I swear.
I swear I only know the Swift from the top but I'm assuming that the upper right is the "hawk tuah" bullshit that everyone keeps talking about.
I'm having a "literally who?" moment on top mid.
This is not good.
Pandora's box just got opened.