You're absolutely right in this case. I will probably end up adding a full face respirator and various different cartridges including P100s to my emergency kits.

Note that this wouldn't stop the smell though. It MAY inhibit it, I guess, in the same way that covering your mouth with your shirt after someone has a spicy salsa diarrhea in your bathroom.

What is extra impressive about this is that it had to be a specific orientation.

NASA is being emasculated by SpaceX. Boeing and the like as well.

I remain skeptical, but there is no need to shoot myself in the foot when it's stepping where I want it to.

My dogs have been easy to train ever since I've been in charge of training them.

The only time accidents have happened is when they've had UTIs.

My huskies in particular were house trained from the outset.

"We're not gonna say what type of little people"

So, children?

Sounds like someone trying to save their ass by "talking about it", but refusing to be totally forthcoming and leaving innuendo on the table.

I can't believe this was an argument that they made.

Eh, the way he's phrasing it can make a pretty decent dent into justifying a more expensive and efficient generator that you may not be able to without it.

Frankly, any tax relief is better than no tax relief. Because taxation is theft.

I could really only see myself getting a (very heavy) pure sine wave gas powered generator with a battery backup at this point. Had too many permanent problems with old generators, and outages seem to come too frequently in my area with the lightest breeze.

Specifically heavy because this area has become a lot more crime ridden over the years, and ain't no one really wants to go out tired at 3 AM and get ambushed when their generator goes off and they're not thinking straight enough to have a firearm with them.

The use of the word "misinformation" is gay to the highest and most offensive degree.

Breitbart's article is dated yesterday, and it is highly -- very -- probable that this post was made before that came in.

Rather than using bogus phrases that only came into popularity because they were too scared to say "fake news" after we stole it from them before COVID hit, just say "this is no longer true" and hit them with an article / other real source to correct them.

Doesn't have to be salt water.

Good.

Good, but it's fact backed up by several opposition news outlets.

The institution has absolutely become a problem.

It is rotten to its core.

Well, considering all of the real ways you would acquire human meat are illegal (murder, digging up corpses, stealing corpses, buying corpses, etc.) I figure it's kind of unnecessary to create a further law.

But maybe we do need one that says "no no no, cannibalism is bad you heathens"

I wish it was just the CCP. That is easier to deal with.

Equal rights means equal fights!

I think you'd be surprised how many people still trust the government enough to let their kids go to public school.

That is to say, it is still a gross majority.

It's always (d)ifferent for them. Their arguments change like the weather, and as volatile as an active volcano amidst an earthquake or a neutron star.

Just ask them a simple hypothetical: "Climate change is fixed and Trump wins the Presidency, or Kamala wins and everything stays the same" and you'll watch them trip over themselves to rationalize why Kamala must win.

Because it's not about that. It's a talking point that they were conditioned to regurgitate at any cost.

Based Chad.

In one sense, I agree. Specifically, I agree that it is not proof because of what patents actually are.

But it does point to those ideas existing, and if the ideas exist then someone in government is definitely trying to develop it for their own use. Secret patents etc.

What it stokes is the unanswered curiosity, because while the patents don't prove it exists, it also doesn't prove that it doesn't.

This is also why the government should never have had carte blanche to develop hidden technologies which it has admitted to developing only after being caught red handed years later; it creates an unending distrust that is fed by being correct over and over again.

Note: I'm not really more than half a foot in on weather control, so I'm not specifically arguing that they're controlling it but just that the government is at this point Biblically evil and I would not put it past them to both find a way and try to hide it from the public.

From an opposition PoV, obstructing Trump's second term is their best play.

If they don't manipulate votes and anger the population, and instead focus on obstructing him, they are done with him after that term. They don't have his charisma to contend with anymore.

But if they try hard to cheat, they either win and the population gets quite ornery or they lose and they get jailed by Trump.

The best strategy they have is just conceding the win to Trump, cheating their smaller wins like Senate or House majority, and obstructing him for 4 years.

But these people are stupid, they don't understand strategy.

I haven't been censored for criticizing Flynn. People have disagreed with me, sure. But that's fine. They're entitled to their opinions and viewpoints too.

Edit: Unless you're talking about weather modification, in which case it has been a bit of a hot topic that has been a bit on the verboten side, though I didn't see too much direct censorship on this point either.

I'm a bit facetious in regards to weather manipulation. I don't fully believe it, but I also don't trust the government not to try it and use what ever bad chemicals they can to do so. I'll refer to it, but it's often at least slightly in jest.

With the things we've read on this very forum?

No, I would not go willingly.

Is there any reason why this is? Both are due to the same natural disaster.

I know insurance companies gonna insurance company but still.

Edit: I guess for people in flood related areas, these are separate insurance coverages which is... definitely vexing looking from the outside in.

Yeah, $5M is pocket change.