1
ange 1 point ago +1 / -0

I thought the troops had hotels in DC. The floor/garage sleeping was on breaks, not overnight.

5
ange 5 points ago +6 / -1

There's no difference in leadership, if these orders are being signed by an imposter being controlled by the "good guys." Talk about a fraudulent campaign....what a disaster that would be.

6
ange 6 points ago +6 / -0

Is your son in daycare or other situations where he is exposed to a lot of people or illness? If not, I’d ask for more time. He literally can’t catch these illnesses just in your home, so ask to wait until he’s going to be more exposed.

In the meantime, I’d look for the video Vaxxed, or another: The Truth About Vaccines. You can also read (both of you) the book: The Vaccine Friendly Plan. The writer is a doctor who talks about the risk of each illness and the risk of each vaccine, and he offers a plan for choosing WHICH vaccines a parent may want, and proposes a schedule. For instance, why does a toddler need a HepB vaccines, when the illness is transmitted through VERY risky adult behaviors? At the very least, you may come to a compromise.

Unfortunately,the existence of vaccines has allowed us to believe that the population is out there just teeming with these viruses, and the vaccines kill them. Obviously, that’s not how it works - healthy people don’t spread disease. But it takes time (I’m telling you from experience) to shake that off completely. Start small and don’t panic. My first 2 kids were fully vaxxed, but I was hearing a lot of info and starting to question. My 3rd had visible reactions to her first vaccines, and that’s when I started to pay a lot of attention really fast.

You’re both clearly wanting what’s best for your child, and try to remember that. It can be too easy to work against each other instead of with each other.

12
ange 12 points ago +13 / -1

I don't actually know who this guy is.

But what the world likes to call 'anti-vaxxers' is actually very often people who DID vaccinate their children and then saw health impacts. They prefer to be called "ex-vaxxers" or "vaccine safety advocates." They aren't stupid- they spend more time researching vaccines than the general population...not unlike this group.

I don't find this post compatible with the message to research and stop taking the govt/CDC at face value.

26
ange 26 points ago +26 / -0

Or a ☘️?

1
ange 1 point ago +1 / -0

Just...like that?No fanfare?

5
ange 5 points ago +5 / -0

What Americans call "a shot" Brits call "a jab." Sometimes you're seeing actual dialect differences, not cutesy nicknames.

3
ange 3 points ago +3 / -0

I don’t even want to hear some of the things he posts. It’s almost like grotesque-porn, but to think some of these things to be true would actually be dangerous.

Biden was executed before he ever ran? By the good guys? Then who the hell was Trump running against, and how would doing so make HIM a “good guy.” That would ACTUALLY be an attempted coup. Makes no sense, and people are frothing for it.

2
ange 2 points ago +2 / -0

His claims are ridiculous.

1
ange 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wait, so is this guy a brilliant white hat actor because real Biden is dead? Or is he a demented potato?

5
ange 5 points ago +5 / -0

I don't know what to think of Graham. I fought hard against the Lincoln Project attacks on him in SC (which makes me like him better, if they wanted him out so bad). But I was really fighting against Jaime Harrison, more than was for Graham. But one of my friends is his friend. And her husband works for him. And my friend is a Patriot with a capital P. So I haven't given up on him yet.

3
ange 3 points ago +3 / -0

What insider info?

5
ange 5 points ago +5 / -0

That show was still running?

2
ange 2 points ago +2 / -0

Nah, Obama already admitted it. It isn't disqualifying, especially as long as they're honest.

1
ange 1 point ago +1 / -0

I guess he was saying that sort of line at a few rallies in the fall. I think this is the one I heard in real time. https://youtu.be/v4uwNtBYNP8

1
ange 1 point ago +1 / -0

I can't swear it's exact (I'll look) but it's really close! It jumped out at me because of how it contradicted the narrative of his hating women in general. No, just her. (And Hillary) ?

2
ange 2 points ago +2 / -0

He said, "You will have a woman president, but it will not be her." ?

4
ange 4 points ago +4 / -0

I was watching for it a few days ago on the fuzzy boom video. He got on the plane, Psaki and crew stood around giggling, handling carry on bags...no military appeared with a leather bag to follow the president, at least as far as I could see.

2
ange 2 points ago +2 / -0

Your description of their reasoning actually sounds very logical. I don't know what 5 weeks would be the magic number, but lymph nodes do get inflamed as they build immune response to illness. It stands to reason, objectively speaking, that they would do the same for a vaccine, and that could interfere with an accurate result on a mammogram.

13
ange 13 points ago +13 / -0

Oh good grief. Nobody ever even knew what that rune was before CPAC. ?

4
ange 4 points ago +6 / -2

Putin has built his entire image around appearing threatening, and he’s supposed to be butt-hurt when someone calls him a killer. And I’m the retard. ?

2
ange 2 points ago +5 / -3

Well, but I don’t expect Russia to be so soft that they’re going to be all “I feel attacked” over having their president called a killer. Especially when...he is.

2
ange 2 points ago +2 / -0

Can you tell me what brought this post up? I think I missed the leap to get here.

I’m not lazy, I promise, but new around here and trying to figure out what I’m supposed to be learning.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›