what type of explosives in controlled demolition can completely powder-ify the entire building? yet paper was not affected, as seen on the ground? why were all of the cars touched by the dust charred and burned as if they'd been exposed to magma or intense heat? why didn't the building register on the richter scale at the an appropriate level for that amount of mass hitting the ground? how did the teams of firefighters survive a controlled demolition on the second floor with that much mass coming down? what was up with the geomagnetic field up to and then sharply after the event?

Of course, that would require the normie to actually sit and listen to her 1.5-2 hour full presentation! haha

Although I have been able to get several people in my life to watch/read about it, and they have been thoroughly convinced there's more to the funniness that simple controlled demo

In the end, it was a few things at least, a show of force (not only of the tech, but of the media mind control the people in power had over "their" people), a coverup of missing money, a "reason" to invade iraq, a reason to step up TSA & general spying (patriot act), and so on

Have you perhaps ever read or watched Judy Wood's "Where did the Towers go?" lecture/presentation? I think it is a great example of how far the tech was even back in 2001

Thanks for listening, I understand the desire to organize post types. The technology is a vastly different subject than what GAW is most of the time, so it makes sense to organize it into a single, visible sticky thread (it will likely be a few days for the interest to wane, but right now many many discussions are happening about it, even from locals that live there and lived through the fires)

Found a simple viewer-friendly video (Why Laser Weapons are About to Change Everything) from 9 days ago that goes over some of the simpler systems.

There was also the wiki page (Boeing YAL-1) with a much larger aperture & power system than is seen on the tanks / fighter aircraft. Interesting stuff

I think it would be wise to sticky the DEW quarantine post you put in the stickied comment for this thread, possibly for several days. Otherwise people are going to be banned / timedout and not understand why, which is not a good feeling especially when people are excited to learn/research that particular subject

why not sticky that "quarantine" post then, so folks can post in there rather than creating new posts and feeling odd for being banned about something they find legitimately curious?

I would argue it is just as low effort to suggest that it was plain arson. I agree that just saying it's space lasers is silly. However, to classify all directed energy weapons as space lasers, is also silly.

It's worth it to have a discussion about all types of energy weaponry, not just "muh space lasers," such weapons could be used to detonate even disconnected transformers, cause battery fires, overcharge the magnetrons in microwaves, blow fuses, etc. All possible origins of fire

As I said in another response to a comment of yours, the resulting effect and the planned "reconstruction" effort is of more interest to most. Which is fine. But allowing more people to learn and discuss these types of weapons will open our eyes to the other ways they can be used around the world

I am sure that it's harmless to discuss technologies that exist, like that comment of yours you linked. There are also discussions of various energy technologies that are also harmless, yet, informative or curiosity-inducing

Again, the continuing conversation remains as to be (if the damage on Maui was intentional) why it was done and to what end.

Why did paper survive the collapse yet all of the concrete was turned into dust? How were the firerfighters on the second floor able to survive that many floors coming down on them if it was purely controlled explosions? Why were all of the cars in the area singed and completely melted through, any of the ones that touched the dust? Why didn't the building register on the richter scale appropriately (that much mass would've generated a larger event)? What was going on with the geomagnetic field right up to and after the event?

It's not fringe to point out that certain technologies exist, and could've possibly been used. Either way, it was a clearing of heritage owned property and the resultant effects are worth discussing.

arson via lasers, arson via a bunch of renegade people, effect is still the effect.

since we won't know which it is, it's useless to say it 100% is one way or another

So you simply don't think that directed energy was used in this particular case, then?

Are you denying that directed energy weapons exist? or that they were used in this context, specifically?

Or, we've been looking into it for years, and it seems like there's enough evidence to suggest it's a possibility.

Weapons exist, and weapons can be used. If you're completely denying that DEW weapons exist, that's simply silly. Whether or not DEWs were used in Maui is mostly irrelevant, high value land was not being sold by the locals, and so there's motive to have some type of arson. Be it DEWs on planes or some type of organized ground-force militia (riskier, because they could be caught in the fires themselves, or on camera, or by the locals)

alloys, or to get a consistent melt across the entire medium. aluminum might melt as flakes at 1220, but large quantities like in foundries would likely be higher temperature to ensure the whole medium is meltted consistently

They were used even earlier in Iraq, and 9/11. If you haven't seen Judy Wood's "Where did the Towers go" presentation, it's a doozy

Have you ever seen Dr Judy Wood's "Where did the Towers go?" presentation?

Do you know how many lightning strikes take place per day... And how few of them produce fires?

Weren't there a bunch of laptops stolen from key congresspeoples offices during that raid? People would've have to haven known the exact layout, timing, infil & exfil to get out with those (to use as evidence?)

?

This is apparently unrelated to the possible use of DEWs in Maui recently, more connected to child/human trafficking or a snuff film facility.

Although I did read in another post around here about a fleet of "Atlantis subs" being destroyed in the fires. Same subs used by Epstein some said

any underwater drilling companies? or just natural tunnel systems? wouldn't there be a tidal difference in the lakes if linked to larger bodies of water? or are you suggesting that the tunnels are "normal / cave like" used for transport

bummer for them if the population of maui figures out what this is about quickly

yup

Post santa rosa fires, the fire chiefs agreed that fires do not burn with that level of intensity, structures usually remain intact. And just like santa rosa fires, insane wind that seems to come out of nowhere, lights in the skies, etc