For those who do not know Eric Ciaramella
For those who would like the whole post
From Ken Blackwell over at FaceBook. GREAT read!
A thread.
- No Kings explained for people who think they're fighting fascism.
500 groups. Three billion dollars in revenue. Pre printed signs stacked and shipped before you even knew what you were supposed to be mad about.
That is not a spontaneous uprising. That is infrastructure.
That is planning. That is money. That is message discipline.
And that is what you walked into on Saturday.
You looked around, saw the crowd, saw the slogans, felt the energy, and told yourself this was democracy. “No Kings.” It sounded clean. It sounded righteous. It felt like you were part of something organic.
But the signs were ready before your outrage was.
That should bother you.
Because you are not living under a king. You are living in a constitutional republic with elections, term limits, and a press that has spent years attacking the most powerful figures in the country without consequence. No one is being arrested for calling a president a fascist. No one is being silenced for dissenting.
That is not tyranny.
And yet you are being told it is.
You are being trained to see normal functions of a country as authoritarian. Loving your country becomes suspicious. Wanting a secure border becomes immoral. Believing parents should have a say in their children’s lives becomes dangerous. Asking basic questions about elections becomes taboo.
That is not clarity. That is conditioning.
Every country on Earth enforces its borders. Most require identification to vote. That is not controversial anywhere else. It is only controversial here because you have been told it should be.
And you believed it.
Meanwhile, look at the people who actually hold power and how long they have held it:
Chuck Schumer. 46 years. Longer than Stalin.
Steny Hoyer. 45 years. Longer than Mao.
Mitch McConnell. 42 years. 5x more than Napoleon.
Nancy Pelosi. 39 years. Longer than Henry VIII.
Maxine Waters. 35 years. Longer than Mussolini.
Bernie Sanders. 35 years. Triple Hitler’s entire reign.
That is what entrenched power looks like.
Decades. Not months. Not a single term. Decades.
But you are told the threat to democracy is the outsider who disrupted that system for a brief window of time.
You are told he is the king.
No. What you are reacting to is not monarchy. It is loss of control.
You do not hate kings. You hate kings that are not yours.
Because when power consolidates on your side, you justify it.
A sitting president steps aside. Within days, a replacement is effectively crowned without a real contest, without a meaningful debate, without voters having a say in a process that is supposed to belong to them.
No primary. No debate. No ballot.
And you said nothing.
Three days before you marched, lawmakers aligned with your movement rejected voter identification requirements. At the same time, you lived through a period where you had to show documentation to participate in basic parts of life.
You needed proof to eat, to travel, to work.
But asking for proof to vote is suddenly oppression.
That contradiction should stop you cold. Instead, it gets waved away.
Look at how power is actually maintained.
Non citizens are counted in the census. Census numbers determine representation. Representation determines power. Remove verification, expand the count, and you increase influence without ever needing a crown.
That is how modern systems entrench themselves.
Then look at speech.
There is written evidence of government officials pressuring platforms like Facebook to suppress information. Not just misinformation. Information that later proved to be accurate. Scientists were sidelined. Doctors were ignored. Even humor and satire were targeted.
Humor.
Part 2 2) When people in power are deciding which jokes are allowed, you are not dealing with a healthy system.
That control did not come through loud decrees. It came through quiet coordination with corporations that act as extensions of political authority.
That is far more effective than any throne.
And it does not stop at speech.
Across the country, institutions are redefining the relationship between parents and children, sometimes making life altering decisions without transparency or consent. The state is stepping into spaces that used to belong to families.
History has seen that pattern before.
Then there is the selective enforcement of rules.
During lockdowns, small businesses were shut down. Churches were closed. Families were kept from their loved ones in their final moments.
At the same time, large scale unrest that caused billions in damage and cost lives was treated as justified or even necessary.
One standard for one group. A completely different standard for another.
That is not equal application of law. That is power deciding what counts.
And when it comes to political violence, the conversation is selective.
When Charlie Kirk spent years walking onto campuses trying to engage in debate, he represented something fundamental about open discourse. The ability to show up, speak, and be challenged.
But increasingly, one side is met not with argument but with shutdowns, intimidation, and sometimes violence. Data that complicates the dominant narrative gets buried because it is inconvenient.
One side talks. The other side tries to silence.
And you are told which one is dangerous.
Look at who you marched alongside.
Organizations like the Party for Socialism and Liberation were not hiding. They were present, organized, and clear about their goal: revolution, not reform.
That ideology has already been tested in the real world. It does not produce freedom. It produces control.
And yet they had signs ready for you.
Hundreds of groups. Billions in funding. A coordinated message. And money that traces back to figures like Neville Roy Singham, a billionaire operating out of Shanghai with ties to networks aligned with the Chinese Communist Party.
You thought you were fighting for democracy.
You were participating in something far more organized than you realized.
Even institutions that once stood firmly for civil liberties are raising concerns. The American Civil Liberties Union built its legacy defending speech for people it disagreed with because it understood that once you start carving out exceptions, the entire principle collapses.
Now even that standard is eroding.
Look at the shift over time.
Bill Clinton stood before the country and said illegal immigration was wrong and received a standing ovation. He expanded policing. He talked about limiting government. He operated within a framework that assumed borders, law enforcement, and free speech were foundational.
Today, many of those same positions would get him labeled extreme by his own party.
That is how far the ground has moved.
So when you chant about kings, understand what you are actually defending and what you are actually ignoring.
Historians look for patterns when evaluating systems of power. Suppression of opposition. Disregard for process. Acceptance of political violence. Enforcement of ideology through institutions. Alignment between corporate and state power.
Ask yourself honestly where those patterns are showing up.
Because the answer is not as simple as the slogan you were handed.
You marched against kings.
But what you are actually enabling is a system that does not need a crown to control you.
You think you’re resisting control while helping construct it.
Not sure they are saying that Finland coordinates attacks with Ukraine. Here is the English translation.
To save everyone's time, here is what he wrote
Joshua Hall
@JoshHall2024
🚨BREAKING: Former Democrat Mayor of Detroit Kwame Kilpatrick says he has friends in Wayne County who oversaw the 2020 election who have informed him that Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer and Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson PERSONALLY ORDERED the shipment and counting of HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF FRAUDULENT BIDEN BALLOTS in the middle of the night on election night when it became evident that President Trump was going to win the state. Kilpatrick says that stealing elections is the Democrats' favorite past time in order to maintain power over the city of Detroit and that Whitmer and Benson received MILLIONS OF DOLLARS from hostile foreign governments in order to RIG the 2020 election in Michigan. In other words, President Trump was right again... He was the lawful winner of the state of Michigan in that STOLEN election and these two evil women committed TREASON to overturn the will of the people. The radical left Democrat Party is in fact THE ENEMY and THE GREATEST EXISTENTIAL THREAT to The United States of America today!!
Here are the CS Lewis books mentioned. You can download the pdf's.
http://www.samizdat.qc.ca/cosmos/philo/AbolitionofMan.pdf
http://www.samizdat.qc.ca/arts/lit/PDFs/OutofSilentPlanet_CSL.pdf
http://www.samizdat.qc.ca/arts/lit/PDFs/Perelandra_CSL.pdf
http://www.samizdat.qc.ca/arts/lit/PDFs/HideousStrength_CSL.pdf
http://www.samizdat.qc.ca/arts/lit/PDFs/Pilgrims_Regress_CSL.pdf
It goes much further back than the Papacy. After King David, the tribes of Israel were ruled by many evil kings (some good kings also) that led to the separation of the tribes. Only the tribes of Judah, Benjamin and a scattering of Levites remained. I have no idea why they are not referred to Jews and Bens. I also have no idea why the Ashkenazi are referred to as Jews. They may practice a form of Judaism but are not from the chosen tribe of Judah. There is so much hidden from us and we just need to trust in God. For what it is worth, I believe our President was chosen by God (study Kim Clement and Mark Taylor's Trump Prophecy).
𝗩𝗜𝗖𝗧𝗢𝗥 𝗗𝗔𝗩𝗜𝗦 𝗛𝗔𝗡𝗦𝗢𝗡: 𝗧𝗥𝗨𝗠𝗣 𝗝𝗨𝗦𝗧 𝗖𝗛𝗔𝗡𝗚𝗘𝗗 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗪𝗢𝗥𝗟𝗗
Victor Davis Hanson — one of the greatest military historians alive — laid out exactly why what Trump just did in Iran isn't just a military victory. It's a 𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗴𝗶𝗰 𝗿𝗲𝘃𝗼𝗹𝘂𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻.
His argument is simple: 𝗴𝗲𝘁 𝗿𝗶𝗱 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗿𝗲𝗴𝗶𝗺𝗲 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗮𝗹𝗹 𝗴𝗼𝗼𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴𝘀 𝗵𝗮𝗽𝗽𝗲𝗻. No Iran means no money for H-z-b, no money for H-m-s, no money for the Houthis. China loses its proxy in the Middle East. Russia already lost Syria. Now it loses Iran.
North Korea, Russia, and China have been supplying Iran with drones and missiles. That pipeline is now severed. And without Iranian petrodollars flowing to terror proxies across the region, Israel can finish the job at its ease.
But Hanson zooms out further. This isn't haphazard. Trump is methodically dismantling the entire axis — Iran, Cuba, Venezuela — 𝗮𝗹𝗹 𝗮𝗶𝗺𝗲𝗱 𝗮𝘁 𝗼𝗻𝗲 𝗹𝗮𝗿𝗴𝗲𝗿 𝗴𝗼𝗮𝗹: breaking up the China-Russia-North Korea nexus that has been the source of global instability for decades.
And the message to Beijing is unmistakable: 𝘄𝗲 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗔𝗺𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗰𝗮 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗿𝗮𝗻 𝗳𝗿𝗼𝗺 𝗔𝗳𝗴𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗻. This is a new military. One that doesn't do DEI briefings and drag shows on base. One that delivers results.
Peace through strength isn't a bumper sticker. It's a track record.
𝗧𝗿𝘂𝗺𝗽 𝗶𝘀 𝗱𝗲𝗹𝗶𝘃𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗶𝘁.
A Man Of Memes @RickyDoggin A MASTERCLASS IN MILITARY INCOMPETENCE The Starmer administration’s handling of the Iranian crisis is being whispered about in the corridors of Whitehall as a historic "cock up" of the highest order. Despite receiving a formal request from the Americans on 11 February—a full 17 days before the offensive actually commenced—the British government appears to have spent that critical window in a state of paralyzed indecision. The U.S. request was not an invitation for Britain to join the initial "decapitation strikes," but rather a plea for the Royal Navy to help shield vulnerable Gulf allies from the inevitable Iranian retaliation. Instead of stepping up to protect the 240,000 British citizens living in Dubai and Abu Dhabi, the Ministry of Defence oversaw a period of baffling inaction that has left regional partners feeling utterly betrayed.
The diplomatic fallout has been described by insiders as nothing short of catastrophic, with Middle Eastern allies expressing "undiluted fury" at the lack of British support. A former minister with deep ties to Amman reports that Jordan is "fking furious," while leaders in Kuwait and the Emirates are openly questioning whose side Britain is actually on. The Cypriots are reportedly "incandescent" after learning that military assets were actually withdrawn from their vicinity just as the threat level spiked. Only this week did it emerge that HMS Dragon would finally deploy—nearly three weeks after the initial American SOS—a timeline that military experts say is far too little and far too late to restore trust.
Strategic failures have been compounded by what veteran commanders call a total lack of foresight regarding naval positioning. The only available Astute-class submarine was permitted to continue its journey toward Australia, despite having passed through the Gulf just weeks ago when it could have been held as a vital contingency. Security officials now warn that the Trump administration is viewing the UK’s "free riding" with growing contempt. There is a palpable fear in the MOD that the Americans, tired of London’s dithering, will simply cut Britain out of the loop entirely and strike a direct deal with Mauritius to secure the long-term use of Diego Garcia for future operations.
Inside the government, the situation is being described as "incoherent" and "unconscionable." By allowing the United States to utilize British bases like RAF Fairford for strikes while simultaneously refusing to participate in the missions themselves, Starmer has managed to achieve the worst of both worlds. Critics say they have invited the risk of being targeted by Tehran without the benefit of having any say in the coalition's strategic direction. One former defence chief has branded this policy "reprehensible," arguing that Britain has effectively surrendered its seat at the table in exchange for a front-row seat to its own strategic irrelevance.
The sobering reality in Whitehall is a growing sense that the UK no longer has the capacity to shape events in the Middle East. A former Downing Street adviser noted that the "intensity of Labour’s feelings" on the conflict is now matched only by their lack of influence. Allies have stopped listening because they no longer believe Britain can—or will—deliver on its security promises. As the Trump administration continues its high-tempo campaign to dismantle the IRGC, the United Kingdom finds itself sidelined, watched with suspicion by its friends and emboldened by its enemies, all due to a fortnight of inexcusable hesitation.
LimitLess @NoAlphaLimits 🚨🚨🚨 FORGET THE MISSILES. THE REAL KILL SHOT ON IRAN IS COMING FROM DUBAI. 🚨🚨🚨
While the world watches rockets light up the sky — the UAE is quietly loading a weapon FAR more destructive than any warhead.
Dubai is reportedly considering FREEZING ALL IRANIAN ASSETS.
This doesn't sound scary until you understand what it actually means:
⚠️ Dubai has been Iran's ONLY functioning financial artery for 40 YEARS
⚠️ $9 BILLION+ flows through UAE annually — shadow oil sales, IRGC accounts, shell companies, hawala networks
⚠️ Every sanctions workaround, every secret deal, every dollar Iran moves — goes through DUBAI
⚠️ Freezing those assets doesn't just hurt Iran. It KILLS their shadow economy OVERNIGHT.
This is why it's happening NOW:
→ Iran launched 1,000+ drones and missiles at UAE targets → 3 killed, dozens injured ON UAE SOIL → Dubai was neutral for decades — profiting from both sides → Iran crossed the red line by attacking the hand that fed them → Now Dubai wants revenge — and the weapon is MONEY
No missile defense can stop this. No bunker can protect against it. No proxy army can fight it.
You can survive bombs. You can't survive having your entire financial system UNPLUGGED.
Iran's military is running out of missiles — from 350 on Day 1 to 15 on Day 8. Their leader is DEAD. Their airports are on FIRE. And now their last financial lifeline is about to be CUT.
They didn't just lose the war. They're about to lose the ability to FUNCTION as a state.
Prepare accordingly. 🚨🚨🚨
She did take a long time and that is sad. Today's bible readings included the "Prodigal Son." Please be pleased that she has awakened and turned from her evil. She has found and realized that the love of the Father is more important than anything in her life.
Scene from the movie Nerarious
Very good. I had to look Battle of Athens up
The 1946 Battle of Athens was an armed revolt in McMinn County, Tennessee, where WWII veterans overthrew a corrupt local political machine. On August 1–2, 1946, veterans besieged the county jail to secure ballot boxes after officials engaged in voter intimidation and fraud, ensuring an honest election without any casualties. Key Facts about the Battle of Athens: Context: Returning GIs found the local political machine, led by Sheriff Paul Cantrell, engaged in corruption, police brutality, and rigging elections to maintain power. The Incident: On election day, August 1, 1946, deputies arrested GI poll watchers and locked themselves in the jail with ballot boxes. The Siege: Approximately 60 to 200 veterans and citizens armed themselves, surrounded the jail, and exchanged gunfire with the deputies. Outcome: The, veterans used explosives to breach the jail, forcing the surrender of the officials. The ballots were counted, and the reform "G.I. Ticket" was elected. Significance: It is often cited as a triumph of democratic action against local tyranny, with the veterans’ actions ensuring that "every vote was counted as cast".
Full transcript
John Ʌ Konrad V
@johnkonrad
This is potentially the biggest Iran story nobody is talking about: the global insurance market may be heading toward a systemic crisis. Here’s why…
Most people don’t realize London isn’t just a financial center it’s THE center of global insurance.
Lloyd’s underwrites ~40% of the world’s marine cargo. Ship sinks, port gets bombed, canal gets blocked the bill lands in London.
This is why the UK punches above its weight. Not the Royal Navy. Not diplomacy. Insurance.
Control insurance, control trade. And London doesn’t just control the 90% of global trade that moves by sea. Lloyd’s and the London market are major insurers of almost everything skyscrapers, factories, ports, satellites, entire supply chains.
You can’t participate in public markets or raise large amounts of capital without insurance.
Now, the normal playbook for war risk is repricing, not cancellation.
Canceling coverage entirely is a massive escalation in underwriting posture. It signals something beyond risk, it signals uncertainty so deep the underwriter can’t even price it.
The question everyone should be asking: why?
Why not just jack up premiums and make a fortune off the crisis like they did in the Black Sea off Ukraine?
To answer that, you have to understand WHY London has maintained a stranglehold on global insurance while losing nearly submarket related to ships.
The answer: better intelligence.
It is no coincidence that MI6 headquarters sits directly across the Thames from the @IMOHQ , the world’s maritime regulator & a short distance from Lloyd’s itself.
I have no proof of a direct pipeline, but it has long been speculated in the industry that intelligence flows from MI6 to Lloyd’s.
Having the best intel in the world would be the single greatest competitive advantage any insurer could possess: the ability to price risk that competitors can only guess at.
Here’s the problem: the majority of MI6’s intel doesn’t come from its own agents. It comes from Five Eyes the alliance comprising the US, UK, Australia, Canada, and New Zealand.
And within 5Eyes, the dominant partner is obvious. The CIA, NSA, NRO, etc generate the lion’s share of intel.
So if Lloyd’s pricing advantage flows from MI6, and MI6’s best intelligence flows from the US… what happens when that data pipeline gets throttled?
All indications are that @Keir_Starmer was blindsided by the size and scope of the US/Israel strikes on Iran this weekend. That alone tells you something about the current state of transatlantic intelligence sharing.
And we know there has been serious anger in Washington over the UK’s decision to sell Diego Garcia, home to America’s most strategically important base in the Indian Ocean, to Mauritius.
It is not a huge leap to conclude that the submarine cables linking Langley to London have gone dark, or at minimum have been significantly throttled.
What this means for UK national security is a question for the Brits. But what it means for EVERY company globally that’s insured through the London market has massive implications for the entire financial system.
Because most large insurers worldwide don’t do independent intelligence work. They index off Lloyd’s rates.
If you’re insuring a skyscraper in Tokyo, a semiconductor fab in Taiwan, or a port in Argentina you get a Lloyd’s quote, then shop that price around.
Other insurers see Lloyd’s number and assume the diligence was done. They price accordingly.
This means if London is suddenly flying blind it’s not just Lloyd’s policyholders at risk. It’s the entire global reinsurance chain.
The cancellation of war risk coverage on ships isn’t the crisis. It’s the canary.
If this hypothesis is correct, we could be looking at a systemic repricing event across global insurance markets…. the kind of cascading uncertainty that defined 2008 and COVID.
Watch Lloyd’s. Watch reinsurance spreads. What Five Eyes. That’s where this story, and possibly Wall Street, breaks.
Here is the X post
I've been a libertarian since I was 19. Thomas Massie was my literal north star of politicians for over a decade. What changed? My understanding of money and capital flows. The more I learned the more his grift became obvious. I'm also no longer a libertarian. It's a neat rhetoric but addresses nothing. This is my research below using an AI framework I built and operate.
How Thomas Massie’s votes during Trump 2.0 directly harmed his Kentucky 4th District constituents:
Voted against Trump’s major tax and spending package (“One Big Beautiful Bill”): Massie’s spin: “I won’t vote for bloated spending and more debt. Principles over party."
This bill contained critical tax relief, domestic manufacturing credits, and energy production incentives. Northern Kentucky’s manufacturing and logistics hubs in Boone, Kenton, and Campbell counties (Hebron, Erlanger, Covington) would have directly benefited from reshoring and job growth in auto parts, aerospace components, and advanced manufacturing.
Opposed Trump’s tariffs on China and adversarial nations: Massie’s spin: “Tariffs are taxes on Americans. Free markets and free trade are the answers.”
Kentucky’s steel, aluminum, and auto parts suppliers along the Ohio River and I-75 corridor were getting crushed by Chinese dumping. His repeated “no” votes kept the globalist offshoring incentive alive, directly threatening factories and blue-collar jobs in Gallatin, Carroll, and Boone counties.
Sponsored War Powers Resolution to restrict Trump’s Iran actions: Massie’s spin: “Congress must check executive war powers. No more endless wars.”
Northern Kentucky has major logistics, trucking, and fuel distribution tied to stable energy prices. Weakening leverage on Iran prolonged supply chain risk and higher diesel/fertilizer costs for local manufacturers and farmers in his district.
Voted against key industrial policy and DPA 303 reshoring measures: Massie’s spin: “Government picking winners and losers is cronyism. I support small government.”
The 4th District has strong potential in advanced manufacturing and critical minerals. Blocking these tools delayed job creation in economically depressed areas like Grant and Pendleton counties that lost factories during the globalist offshoring wave.
Opposed major border security funding in appropriations bills: Massie’s spin: “I won’t support bloated omnibus bills with waste.”
Construction, meatpacking, and service industries in Kenton and Campbell counties face direct wage suppression from illegal immigration. His resistance prolonged downward pressure on working-class wages in his own backyard.
Voted against foreign aid packages tied to bilateral energy and security deals: Massie’s spin: “We shouldn’t be the world’s policeman. America First means no foreign entanglements.”
These packages supported alliances that stabilize energy flows. Kentucky’s agricultural exporters (bourbon, soybeans, tobacco) and energy-dependent manufacturers needed reliable trade routes. His votes undermined the bilateral architecture that would have given Kentucky producers better market access.
Blocked government funding bills containing America First priorities: Massie’s spin: “I refuse to vote for continuing resolutions that kick the can down the road.”
These bills included tariff enforcement funding, domestic energy production, and manufacturing tax credits. His obstruction delayed practical help for the I-75 manufacturing corridor and Ohio River industrial towns in his district.
Bottom line: Massie consistently wrapped globalist-friendly votes in libertarian rhetoric. He knew the data on offshoring damage and energy vulnerability in Northern Kentucky, yet chose ideological purity over policies that would have delivered real jobs, higher wages, and economic security to his constituents.