A mistake is dropping a birthday cake. I can forgive a mistake. Genocide is not a mistake, it’s a crime. One does not accidently commit genocide. It requires deliberate forethought and planning. The perpetrators can have remorse and apologize, but a premeditated crime requires punishment. These officials made an individual choice to commit their part of this crime.
We are going to be seeing a lot more of these in the near future. We are going to have to make personal and moral decisions about how to handle these. This may very well be the hardest moral decision we will have to make in our own lives. Some of the officials are going to be sincere, others are going to be “face saving” and yet some will be an attempt to save their own lives. We are going to have to take a moral position.
For myself, I’m torn between to perspectives: Forgiveness and Guilt/Punishment.
I am not any special person, yet early on I knew these jabs were pure evil. They violated almost everything I can think of. They violated the Nuremburg codes, medical ethics, legal standards, the Constitution, Religious beliefs, personal preferences, personal safety, parent/child bonds and security and so much more. Yet, these officials still demanded and required people to get injected, and usually against their will.
The officials threatened jobs, family, religion, safety and so much more to push an agenda. Lives were ruined or in many cases, lost. “I was just doing my job” is NOT A DEFENSE. Those are such wise words. Now, it is a FACT that these jabs were intentionally designed to kill millions of people. So, how do we respond to an apology?
The Spirit says to forgive yet “no punishment” is NOT scriptural, fair, nor appropriate. George S. Patton once said, ”May God have mercy on their souls because I sure as hell won’t.” Somehow, that sounds reasonable. Those who pushed the jab made a conscience decision to push something that they themselves did not research. If I was able to research and discover the evil in the jab, they could have done the same, but they chose not to. They chose to “follow orders.” This seems to be where my sympathy ends.
I can’t just ignore the damage that was inflicted on innocent people. Whether doctor, nurse, elected official, employer or whatever, they had a responsibility that innocent people relied on. Responsibility was their job. To me, it is their responsibility to make sure they “Do no Harm.” To me, this is where they failed.
I might be wrong, but this position seems reasonable to me.
It's not a death sentence. Unless it's debilitating for him, it's only an inconvenience or minor loss of motion. Possibly physical therapy or serious stretching may help. For myself, I also have what are called "trigger finger" occur from time to time. Those are annoying but not a serious issue. I have found that serious stretching can alleviate them, but I'm talking serious stretching. After a day or two they go away.
Not only have I heard of it, I have one. I've had it for over 20 years. For me, there is no progression and no interference with normal operation. I have heard of some nonsurgical options, but I am not specifically familiar with them. Hand surgeries can advance or enhance arthritis later in life. I would be personally uncomfortable with medical tourism but I have heard of people who do it and are completely satisfied.
For myself, I don't like the "won't enforce" solutions. That ILLEGAL law is still on the books, but now subject to someone's discretionary opinion. I don't like that. They could "restart" it any any time. If you want to ignore the law, repeal it. No Trojan horses.
I saw an interview this morning with that lawyer that's doing all this investigative work, and he was asked that question. His response was interesting. He said that locally, it might be hard to find a judge, or DA or police that isn't compromised and that the FBI and DOJ are partially compromised, but in this situation, there are a lot of other agencies like the SEC, Treasury, DEA, IRS and many others who just LOVE to boost their agency by finding fault with other agencies. He was pretty confident that it will be those other agencies that will bring the pressure. Yes, Katie Hobbs probably has local protection, she may not be well protected beyond that.
This drug money thing and bribery goes across many other states also. Prefect for the feds.
IDK, but we can always hope and pray.
WHAT IF: Looking at the bigger picture, what if Project Veritas has been threatened by Pfizer and PV thought it serious enough to concoct this (maybe fake) story to oust James, sink the company, then render no company available to get sued by Pfizer? James walks away safe, PV goes away safe, the reporters go away safe, board members walk away safe, James starts a new company and rehires former PV employees at the new company and proceeds as usual with a new company safe from law suits.
We've seen this before.
If the corporation goes bankrupt, does that make the contract invalid/dissolved/Insolvent? How far back can a country's bankruptcy court claw back? Centuries? Does it take a war to cancel the contract? What if we dissolve the currency instead? If there is no Rothschild currency, how can a debt be repaid? Assets? OK, we give you that hell hole DC back. In return, pay us for WW1 and WW2 that we fought on your behalf.
Back to reality, If the congress didn't have the authority to enter that contract, how could that contract be valid? They would have entered the contract fraudulently, and fraud vitiates everything.
This is fun!
oh yeah, I like that! How else could you bring in the military without it being a coup? How better a way to prove the legislature is corrupt? Exec branch corrupt, legislature corrupt, courts corrupt and no authority for SCOTUS to fix it. MrBig, I think you've got it! I like that!
Ah, thank you for clearing that up.
and that's perfectly aligned with my question. I just asked it a different way.
Loy Brunson asked "If the oath of office has no teeth, then the constitution has no meaning." This may actually be at the root of what we're asking.
With all respect, I didn't say they don't have standing. Actually they DO have great standing.
I'm just asking about the remedy. Where in the constitution does it allow SCOTUS to be the overseer to the legislative branch? It doesn't. 3 Co-equal branches. Where in the constitution does SCOTUS have the ability to remove any legislator? This is a good case, but no remedy. That's the problem. What's the remedy? Treason? That case must, as stated in the constitution, be herd in the Senate.
I think this is the key. I don't know any way that SCOTUS can remove a sitting member of congress. Not adhering to their oath of office is bad, but I don't know if the constitution carries a penalty. Please advise if you know any. Even treason requires a trial in the senate. The time to carry out 388 treason cases would exceed their term. While Brunson might be correct on the merits, what's the remedy? For myself, I have won court cases, and walked away with nothing. Sucks. Removing a sitting member of congress, by SCOTUS, might be illegal. Interesting constitutional crisis.
"HOT" -could- also be referring to "going in hot" meaning "Guns a blazing." It is possible that with all the food processing plants being destroyed, with all the current train wrecks and other attacks on our infrastructure, that we're in the kinetic phase now. I could be wrong.
Yes, your outer level point is correct and strong. We must be careful when making a statement or point of discussion. We should be able to defend our arguments with facts not fiction. MY favorite saying is "Facts are our Friends."
Agreed, and your point is strong. I do not disagree at all. Tesla discovered resonance about 100 years ago, probably by now, the military has perfected its use/abuse.
I think the bridge you're referring to is the millennium bridge, and yes it was resonance that required its reinforcement.
Well, yes, what you are saying is technically true, but you can bring down a full sized bridge with a few marching troops. As Tesla said, "Think resonance." A direct assault may not have enough energy, but it you can get a resonance going, well........
It may be descending because it's lost its gas or maybe deliberately because it's done its duty and now committing suicide. If, before, it was flying as low as 19,000 ft. they might have had to file a flight plan because it would have been in commercial airspace. For a spy device? Not likely. It's more likely that it WAS flying much higher and now is descending and at a lower altitude.
Now there's a thought that no-one has brought up. He's known world wide, and his arrest would PANIC a zillion DS people.