2
gobby 2 points ago +2 / -0

He was a puppet following his master's orders, just like all the others. He initially encouraged Putin when Putin wanted to join Nato, then later came back after getting his marching orders and told him it wasn't going to happen.

1
gobby 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's exactly my point. You can call a sotu by any other name, but it's still a sotu. My source is the Constitution, which is the most credible. That is exactly what it calls a sotu. An ":address." Anyway, I'm not going to continue pointing this out to you. I have things to do. Have a good day.

3
gobby 3 points ago +3 / -0

So many more have deserved to be censured, and for even worse behavior. Maybe this will be the start of something ...

1
gobby 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm not the only person who viewed it that way. And why didn't you address the point that you were very wrong in saying a sotu address is 'required annually?' Is it really that difficult for you to admit you were wrong about something? It's not the first time, surely. Bottom line is, regardless of what you want to call it, he addressed a joint session of congress and told them the state of the union. If it quacks like a duck ....

1
gobby 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why is it so hard for you to admit you were wrong? Surely it's not the only time. You kind of sound like an obstinate leftist, tbh.

2
gobby 2 points ago +2 / -0

I will never shop at target, regardless. Once a business loses me, they don't get me back by trying to play both sides or by shifting with the cultural winds.

1
gobby 1 point ago +1 / -0

I suggest you do exactly that. And what he did was address what the state of the union is and all the various things he has accomplished in such a short time. Whatever you want to call it, it was a state of the union.

1
gobby 1 point ago +1 / -0

That is incorrect. The Constitution does not require an annual address. It actually says that the president should, "from time to time," give information to congress on the state of the union. That's what he did. It has been tradition for decades now for the president to give a yearly sotu address, but it is not confidentially required, as you said.

It's easy enough to find this information. I hope this clears things up for you.

6
gobby 6 points ago +6 / -0

That was great. Thank you for posting that.

I'd like to point out that Trump's very first SOTU during his first term was very similar and the democrats behaved abominably during that, as well. So why are people just now noticing? It's so important for us to remember that huge numbers of people still don't know what we know. Not even one tenth of what we know. People are definitely awakening, it's just taking a very long time and there are many more to awaken. Moments like the address the other night are helping.

4
gobby 4 points ago +4 / -0

Thanks fren. They really took him to task. It's so refreshing and encouraging to see so many people biting back. Something they got cancelled for not all that long ago. Appreciate the link.

2
gobby 2 points ago +2 / -0

It was exactly what a state of the union address is. An address to a joint session of congress, early in the year.

2
gobby 2 points ago +2 / -0

Which is exactly what a state of the union address is.

1
gobby 1 point ago +1 / -0

While I think that's appropriate, if that is the bar, then dozens more need to be censured. Some for more heinous behavior.

5
gobby 5 points ago +5 / -0

Would some nice fren post the link to Schiff's tweet please and thank you. I'd like to read the other comments.

3
gobby 3 points ago +3 / -0

Agreed. It's the third branch of government but it takes far too long to engage on important issues. They even created other courts to help take the 'burden' off them. They need to get their act together.

2
gobby 2 points ago +2 / -0

The real question is, why hasn't he been arrested? Is Tom Homan just another big talking windbag? It would appear so.

3
gobby 3 points ago +3 / -0

So it's not enough taxpayers are paying interest on the multi trillions in debt, they're also paying interest on credit cards. Brilliant.

1
gobby 1 point ago +1 / -0

People are a lot wiser now. People used to be far more trusting in government, media, authorities in general 60 years ago.

4
gobby 4 points ago +4 / -0

How dare he or anyone else offer the lives of young men on foreign soil for a war they likely don't care about or know anything about. If someone invaded Great Britain, that would be one thing. But to be willing to send innocent young people to a foreign war, that's nothing short of psychopathic. I hope the British people wake up and remove this guy.

4
gobby 4 points ago +5 / -1

Potus reportedly told NBC news he doesn't want to think about the past, but the future. I hope that's just misdirection, because I will be furious if this isn't addressed. Any moron knows you have to know your history or you are bound to repeat it. The people deserve to know and have to know.

view more: Next ›