by BQnita
4
hanksno 4 points ago +4 / -0

I think there needs to be more clarity and responsibility with whom they label an expert. MSNBC called Gottlieb an expert, without clarifying that he was on the board of Pfizer. Fauci, a doctor without patients, is not an experienced doctor. At best, he was a researcher, paid by Big Pharma, with a history of questionable medical ethics. They need to start disclosing the backgrounds of their so-called experts, or face serious consequences. Moreover, whatever happened to conflicts of interest? That Gottlieb was formerly a member of the FDA, before he was purchased by Pfizer, which has a history of FDA violations (not to mention Nuremberg Code violations) should have been red-flagged as a conflict of interest. There should be no crossover employees allowed between Big Pharma reps and gov't health advisors. Paid goons are not experts. Besides, coming from colleges nowadays that cannot even define biological genders, how qualified are these so-called frankenscientists?

7
hanksno 7 points ago +7 / -0

I was thinking that. There was a high rate of infant mortality during the Victorian era due to obvious public health deficiencies and dangerous inventions, but I'd love to know when the phenomenon of SIDS began.

2
hanksno 2 points ago +2 / -0

So quick to condemn an entire nation based on their globalist infiltrators. Imagine if the whole world were to generalize Americans based on the Biden administration? How embarrassing...

2
hanksno 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'd apply for that position. It's kind of fun for me, like crossword puzzles. Typos jump out at me, screaming for assistance.

5
hanksno 5 points ago +5 / -0

Hired mercenaries/foot soldiers don't usually have a good track record for being successful at life in general.

6
hanksno 6 points ago +6 / -0

I suspect many complicit people don't think of themselves that way. That's the power of propaganda. 'Medical professionals' are brain-washed in school from the get-go.

2
hanksno 2 points ago +2 / -0

Science is not a faith-based ideology. Trust doesn't have anything to do with it. There's a reason for the Scientific Method.

11
hanksno 11 points ago +11 / -0

I was selfish once..I went along with things because I was too weary of social backlash, and poisoned by too much black-pilling from angry cowards like my mother, who has always denied that which made her uncomfortable. No more. Finally my 'weirdness' and rebellion has proven to be sanity in an insane world, and I am no longer alone in the dark, full of self-doubt. I have total faith in the plan, things are different than before. This is pure ascension, on a global scale, and it is good. I'm so grateful.

2
hanksno 2 points ago +2 / -0

very interesting...

2
hanksno 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don't mind a good Tucker rant, on occasion, but I watch uploads on YT instead of supporting the Fox website. Can't stand Hannity, the loudmouth tool.

1
hanksno 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm just being mean now, but...he's asking for it. He reminds of one of those awkward high school geeks who lacked the charm and nuance to be socially accepted, but later found fleeting fame as an online influencer, not realizing his 15 minutes are up, and is now talking to dead air. I'm not saying he's dumb, but his arrogance has overtaken his mouth filter. This post of his was embarrassing to read.

2
hanksno 2 points ago +2 / -0

Agreed. We are not his audience anymore, from what I can tell. His condescending child-splaining reminds me of Kamala. He can preach to the sheep all he wants, but his tone is repulsive to the choir, and, imho, unnecessary.

3
hanksno 3 points ago +3 / -0

Agreed. Fat is fat, whether someone is a 'good' guy or 'bad' guy. Not saying fat-shaming is useful, but neither is fat-coddling.

2
hanksno 2 points ago +2 / -0

Excellent context. My argument is, detectives/investigators do it all the time: They surmise a theory of a conspiracy to commit a crime, they investigate to gather evidence, make arrests, and prosecute. A conspiracy by definition is more than two people who conspire to commit a crime. It exists. If someone had piped up about a theory that 9/11 was about to happen, on 9/10, would people call them a baseless conspiracy theorist on 9/12?

2
hanksno 2 points ago +2 / -0

The power of propaganda. Repeat something in a negative light often enough and the original definition changes. The same can be done for the opposite effect, just look at all the biological men in women's prisons and sports.

1
hanksno 1 point ago +1 / -0

For sure. I grew up with hockey on all the time. Legendary. Thanks for the soccer deets. I couldn't remember when or where it happened.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›