now can someone vet that she is a nurse? because thats a major whisteblow if so.
I've actually had this realization about pretty much all books and movies I consumed in my youth. Particularly science fiction and fantasy - I thought those genres always went too far in portraying 'evil' - like made it a caricature too removed from reality to be believable.
I now know that rather most of them didn't go far enough.
he is saying the current vaccines are good enough.
also this
the unvaccinated are still the major drivers of transmission and are themselves at the highest risk of serious disease
also his main worry seems to be that he wants vaccines to go to poor countries that haven't gotten any.
peak globohomo
Guys, you should read the stuff you post before you clap.
he is saying the current vaccines are good enough.
also this
the unvaccinated are still the major drivers of transmission and are themselves at the highest risk of serious disease
also his main worry seems to be that he wants vaccines to go to poor countries that haven't gotten any.
This is peak globohomo. Spread this letter if you wish to justify more repression against unvaccinated.
if there is anyone in history that deserves no credit or optimism, its Democrats.
because everyone here is so on top of shit
not really from where I am sitting. I mean the entire world has moved on from 'tracking by cases' month ago.
The answer to the question in the OP is:
MSM has been marketing the vaccines as preventing death and serious illness by making COVID infections mild.
Which is why
No one really gives a shit about outbreaks anymore - not unless there are deaths from those outbreaks.
Both Patriots.win and here are still memeing breakthroughs like they are 6 months behind the curve. This angle doesn't move anyone.
Should be pushing
if COVID is not serious for vaccinated, why all the fear'
or
Look at all these cases of deaths in the vaccinated
it could also be they are lying pieces of shit.
Btw, when Trump won 2016, turned out none of these fucks had '2 headlines ready to go'
what are they suing based on? there has yet to be any actual policy change through OSHA or executive order
there are no new OSHA rules. Biden talked some shit and everyone shit their pants. There has yet to be any actual policy change
at this rate, your last moment on Earth will be to be looking for signs in the muzzles of the firing squad
your company's HR is the one full of shit in this case
https://www.whitehouse.gov/covidplan/
Requiring All Employers with 100+ Employees to Ensure their Workers are Vaccinated or Tested Weekly
The Department of Labor’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) is developing a rule that will require all employers with 100 or more employees to ensure their workforce is fully vaccinated or require any workers who remain unvaccinated to produce a negative test result on at least a weekly basis before coming to work. OSHA will issue an Emergency Temporary Standard (ETS) to implement this requirement. This requirement will impact over 80 million workers in private sector businesses with 100+ employees.
That said, it amounts to same thing as a mandate as there is no requirement for company to pay for this weekly testing.
according to lefites, the mandata is 'Vaccine OR weekly testing'
send her this
https://www.nytimes.com/video/world/asia/100000007963596/us-drone-attack-kabul-investigation.html
than this
This is from a doctor in Toronto
i don't know where this is, but the guy said he had 9 negative tests and was denied option to quarantine at home and is now in hotel-jail where cops don't let people leave.
doesn't look like it. they're already rounding people up and putting them in covid jails
Israel is a month in on its 3rd jab dissemination. Seems like 10% casualty would have been noticed.
Not to say this news from Germany is not very critical to look into
This is great. I wonder why for Canada, Ontario the number and company listed is based in New York
at my work, its once a week. Find out where that requirement is coming from. Remember, try to be polite but insistent. Also, have your wife get a blood test for antibodies, see if she has natural immunity.
If she does, you can try arguing (by email) that this requirement is unreasonable.
Again, be meticulous and polite. Have a mindset of 'I want to be reasonable and do my due diligence because this might end up in court'
Courts in civil disputes, take note when a party has obviously made good faith effort at conflict resolution before resorting to lawsuits.
c'mon - this is 123k employee company in China. their version of small business
I understand the cathartic release of such an action, but man... wish you tried a more reasonable tone first.
One can always escalate at will, but few ways to de-escalate.
do you have the resources to hold out without her job?
its not merely a matter of cavalier attitudes. The left doesn't like to think things through. Let me illustrate a simple equation for you
Lets not call fetuses 'babies' or 'humans' - that's a rightoid talking point trying to equate abortion to murder
Plus
A woman's choice must be respected above all. She can choose to abort at any time.
Equals
Technically and legally, a fetus that was 'aborted' and not legally born is just a fetus. Not a baby, not a human. Not, legally, a living thing. It legally, can't suffer, is due no consideration for pain or really anything. You can treat it just like one would a beef stake you purchased at the store.
That's step 1.
Here is step 2: Fetal tissue is a very, very desirable good in the medical research and treatment markets. Naturally born organs, grown without any cloning with zero tear or wear on them. And stem cells. Tissue is just rife with stem cells. You know what stem cells are? the are like the magical cure to almost anything - they can turn into anything a human body requires. Replace anything, repair anything.
Now the end result:
What does the phrase
mean to you? Like this is happening, been happening for a long time. Documented and discovered through lawsuits.
How about this other one, Human gestation period is 9 month average.
combined with
harvesting of tissue and organs of aborted babies of 6-42 weeks gestation
You can understand what Forty Two weeks translates to in that context of "Live Dismemberment Abortions"?
Tl,DR - Leftist try to put this debate in terms of 'oh, well would the baby would really have been better off with a mother who doesn't want it?'
Thats not the fucking debate.
The actual debate is:
Should we allow for a huge, billion dollar pharmaceutical industry to casually collect viable babies and than literally chop them the fuck apart to sell off their organs and body parts.
Is it okay for a surgeon, to cut off a little boy's testicles because somewhere, someone is willing to pay a lot of money for a bunch of
42 document the harvesting of genitalia and/or gonads
You know they don't like 'polluting' their fresh new organs and tissues with any contaminant drugs. Like the cutting off of these organs - that's not happening after the baby is already dead. There is an open question on whether any anesthesia is even being used when they take apart the 'not a human being' for parts.
So you tell us all where the fuck should we place the opinion of your Democrat mongoloid fucking demonic friends compared to stopping
LIVE FUCKING CHILDREN FROM BEING CUT THE FUCK UP FOR PROFIT?
First,vast majority of mothers come around to love their 'unwanted babies' after they are born if denied abortion.
Second, even for those kids that have an unhappy home life there is still a chance to find happiness in other places. You are comparing a null value to 'less than optimal'
there is a missing connection here between the two posts. how exactly are they presumed to be related?