1
jfunction 1 point ago +1 / -0

OP is exactly correct. Since the Imran Awan Blackferry days about seven years ago and way before that the vast majority of congress has been suborned.

4
jfunction 4 points ago +4 / -0

It's much worse than that.

McCarthy has been suborned. That means he's effectively an agent of the globalist agenda. Put him in a position to control the house agenda and watch what happens.

A promise from McCarthy is just another cheap lie.

8
jfunction 8 points ago +8 / -0

Q 2211 (timestamp from Trump's post) has the phrase "behind the scenes" in it FOUR times.

https://qalerts.app/?q=%23%232211

1
jfunction 1 point ago +1 / -0

That alone is reason enough not to vote for him - but there's much more to it.

6
jfunction 6 points ago +6 / -0

Yes for Boebert but not at all sure about Donalds. Doesn't strike me as a man of solid character with sufficient experience and expertise to be Speaker.

Think he's miles behind Jim Jordan.

3
jfunction 3 points ago +3 / -0

Drain the swamp.

Or was that just an election slogan?

6
jfunction 6 points ago +6 / -0

McCarthy isn't serving anything inside himself. He is a weak, suborned, semi-man who obeys the orders his globalist controllers give him.

6
jfunction 6 points ago +6 / -0

Wouldn't be doing it if there were a chance of Democrats joining up to get McC over the hump.

2
jfunction 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don't get the reasoning behind your statements. What you assert is not obvious to me at all.

16
jfunction 16 points ago +16 / -0

Vaccine advocate and McCarthy advocate.

Strike two.

18
jfunction 18 points ago +18 / -0

McCarthy, to me, is obviously suborned and controlled by the globalists.

So why is Trump supporting him? All I can think is that DJT knows McCarthy won't be elected speaker because the block of 19 against him is rock solid. So Trump can appear uninvolved in whatever the plan is they've got going for the house.

No idea what the plan is for the house. I want JJ as speaker.

Speaker controls the agenda and I think Jordan is well suited to do that. Better for him to control the house than to control Judiciary.

2
jfunction 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah, that's getting to be the disappointing part right there.

17
jfunction 17 points ago +17 / -0

Jim Jordan for Speaker, then Brunson is decided in favor of Brunson and when the dust settles Trump is back in the WH as the (publicly acknowledged) President and we all live happily ever after.

Then there's a big run on the nation's supply of popcorn as people focus on the big happenings down at GITMO.

Jordan is step one. Jordan as Speaker and Trump as President is a steamroller.

by MAGULQ
2
jfunction 2 points ago +2 / -0

OP has a headful of common sense.

3
jfunction 3 points ago +3 / -0

While this is true the case is only docketed for review.

I believe it will be heard and if it is a lot more of the country will know about it.

And for Brunson, win or lose, the result will be widely known. If the court finds in favor of Brunson the whole world will know and very quickly.

7
jfunction 7 points ago +7 / -0

Brunson traps the supremes in the spotlight glare of national attention on them and their own oaths of office.

Brunson can be seen as a life-or-death decision for each of them as it may lead to them being convicted of treason in a military tribunal should they decide against Brunson.

My understanding is that Brown may recuse.

6
jfunction 6 points ago +6 / -0

I hope people are not asking someone's permission to speak truth to power or to the weak or to the ill-informed.

I hope being polite, "kind" or politically correct isn't more important than saying what is true.

I remember clearly the late '60s when politically correct first emerged. It fractured my group of friends and caused divorces and realignments.

13
jfunction 13 points ago +13 / -0

Me, I'm healthy as a horse.

That's actually what my doctor told me last time I went to see him seven or eight years ago.

Ivermectin rules along with natural selection.

2
jfunction 2 points ago +2 / -0

It certainly has happened. I've seen a lot of video clips that show very nearly these kinds of things.

2
jfunction 2 points ago +2 / -0

All over the world hundreds of people are dying every day from allowing themselves to be subjugated. First the masks and then the poisonous vaccines.

So there is a definite penalty to be paid for allowing tyrants to control you - in any degree.

It is always progressive. Give them an inch and they'll take a mile.

Personally I never masked and always walked the wrong way in the Walmart asiles when they had arrows on the floor.

I am antiwar and anti-violence but am armed and will fight if it comes to fighting.

I will not be subjugated.

3
jfunction 3 points ago +3 / -0

When I entered the army in the early '6os we lined up during induction and got about a dozen shots all at once. They didn't tell us what was in them as far as I remember.

But those were different times and the shots weren't bioweapons intended to kill us slowly. No one refused, worried or got sick.

Now the "military" under the illegitimate Sec, Def. Austin is a just another corrupt government agency - about half of it.

The other half of it is something we're likely to have to rely on in the near future.

Unconstitutional orders from traitorous officers need to be refused.

1
jfunction 1 point ago +1 / -0

I sure hope there's more to this particular movie.

They were fire-hosing some of the crowd? Was that an earlier crowd scene in favor of Bolsonaro?

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›