The first temple was sometimes referred too as David's temple. This first temple was built in the reign of Solomon, David's son. David wanted to build it. David planned for and assembled the resources to build it. However, David was not allowed to build the temple because he was a man of war. God told David via the prophet Nathan that David's son, Solomon, would build the temple. Call this temple 1.0
David's kingdom was split. Ten of twelve tribes formed the (northern) Kingdom of Israel. two of ten tribes formed the (southern) Kingdom of Judah (Judea). The temple of David was in Jerusalem which was the capitol of Judah. Temple 1.0 is still in Judea.
The northern kingdom of Israel would end of conquered by Assyria; the Assyrians carried many of the people of Israel off to other lands as captives. This was a common practice to break up people groups to make them less likely to revolt in the future. Now, only the Kingdom of Judah remained. Temple 1.0 still in Judea.
This first temple existed up through the time of Nebuchadnezzar the Chaldean/Babylonian. Nebuchadnezzar captured Jerusalem twice. The first time, the temple was left standing. Temple 1.0 still in Judea.
Judah rebelled against Nebuchadnezzar. The second time, the temple was razed. Many of the Israelites in the reduced kingdom of Judah were carried of as captives. Temple 1.0 is destroyed.
Fast forward. Nebuchadnezzar passed off the scene as ruler of Babylon. Babylon was conquered by the Medo-Persian empire during the time of Cyrus the Mede. During the time of Medo-Persian rule Israelites taken captive were allowed to return to Judah and rebuild the city of Jerusalem and repair/rebuilding was made to the temple to allow for the resumption of temple activities. Call this temple 2.0
From the standpoint of world powers, Judea was a backwater province captured by Alexander the Great, then changing ownership among the descendants of Alexander's generals. Then Rome gained influence and later control in the region. Judea was brought under Roman 'protection'. One governor of Judea was Herod the Great. Herod the Great was Governor during the time of the birth of Christ. Herod liked building things and one of his projects was to expand onto and beautify the temple in Jerusalem. Call this temple 2.1
In the late 60s of the first Century AD, There was a Jewish uprising against Roman rule and occupation. The Romans sent several legions to surround the city, lay siege to the city, capture the city and destroy much of the city. Herod's temple (2.1) was destroyed by the Romans around 70 AD. Temple 2.1 was destroyed.
There are some differences of opinion about whether Herod's temple is an upgrade or a replacement. Regardless of which view a person prefers, Herod's temple was destroyed by the Romans.
In the late 7th century, Jerusalem was under the control of Muslims. The key leader around that time was Caliph Abd al-Malik. The Caliph built the Dome of the Rock on the mount where the temple used to exist. Whether it is in the exact location of where the temple was is not clear to me (though it may be clear to someone with more precise archaeological knowledge).
Not long after that, the Al-Aqsa Mosque was added to the Temple Mount.
All that is history. My understanding of the still future events are that a temple of some sort will be rebuilt in Jerusalem prior to the return of Jesus the Christ , the Son of God (call that Temple 3.0). After the return of Jesus, a new temple will be built (call that Temple 4.0).
The Bible records that immediately preceding the last judgement, the current 'heavens and earth' will go out of existence. After the judgement, God will make a new heavens and earth. There will be no temple there because the redeemed will be in the direct presence of God; the Holy Spirit will dwell in the redeemed. No temple is needed.
Hope that helps.
Edited to fix a few typos.
https://truthsocial.com/ you can create an account.
As for videos, I will need to find and see if they can be copied elsewhere. That will take me a while as I am not so skilled working with videos.
Thanks, I misunderstood your question. The focus of the movie was to illustrate that there were a large number of mules. The movie is limited time and they wanted to show the variety of people, and how many there were all over the country. There are some videos posted on Truth Social by Philips team showing short clips of what you are asking about. Please recall though that the purpose of the video was to show how pervasive the practice is; not essentially to focus to much time on one mule.
The answer to the question about the same mule stopping at multiple sites on video has been answered in Q/a sessions. There is not video because the government that setup the dropbox location did not put cameras up to observe all dropboxes even though it was required by law. A takeaway from this fact was how to organize people to directly record dropboxes where no government cameras are present.
Do not expect the government to move swiftly to correct this problem. For those benefitting from election theft, the absence of cameras in places is a feature, not a failure. Citizens need to do something about it directly.
Have a great day
Executive Order 13848: https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/presidential-actions/executive-order-imposing-certain-sanctions-event-foreign-interference-united-states-election/
I hereby declare a national emergency to deal with this threat.....
Alright, I get it. You have been at it for a long time and have received countless guaranties and encouragements that generally never came through. And here is the latest in a long line.
The majority of the population don't recognize evil for what it is because they have been conditioned to not recognize it. This is a change of worldview and culture. Short of killing off a large part of the population and introducing worldwide trauma to reroute the thinking of billings, it just takes time.
How many movies need to be released? Totally reasonable question. The answer is 'enough' movies need to be released. The movies are very helpful as they are an accepted cultural means of communicating to the majority of the population. Putting out a moviementary is more palatable to the viewing population then a lot of hard data; its the conditioning of our day, like it or not.
The movies open the door for some to take steps towards the actual hard data by those ready. Part of the population can/will skip the movie and go straight to the data, for whatever reason on an individual basis; most can't or won't. Don't have to like it. Can speak of sheep and what not, but it is reality. Also if the majority are really sheep, then they need to be dealt with in a manner used to make them sheep. This is one of those ways. I have read many testimonies of people on this site who moved from being blind/clueless to being aware. Everyone has their own path.
Timing. The well tested tools of the enemies of a free people are being used against the enemies who made many of them. The use of those tools is contingent on timing to move the population in a direction when it can most help a cause. In concept, the well timed release of information on election fraud will result in action and acceptance when it matters most; at the election.
Hang in there mate, you are not alone. A wise person once said, "If you tell me I have to run another marathon, I am going to quit before I start. If you tell me I just need to make it to the next telephone pole,.... I can do that."
We will carry you to the next pole. You can help carry someone else from there.
Have a great day.
Ashland showing up makes me think of one of these youtube stories, "Friendly dog shows up in house one night. Drives off intruder and makes breakfast. Has a note around its neck which says "Nothing Can Stop What Is Coming."
Very helpful mate; I appreciate it. Have a great day.