If we have enough good people working the polls it lays the foundation for human checks of the machine counts.
Poll workers swear an oath each day on the job. That oath and a bit of legislature backing is the ticket to performing a human check on the counts.
Also critical to keep in mind that there is cheating beyond the machines. Multiple levels are needed in elections that are not close. Remember that poll workers threw out poll watchers in contested city precincts.
Yup. Bodego visit also emphasized that.
Trump is the only American in history to be charged for having a loan higher than the assessed value of a property. It's an utterly assinine charge that demonstrates how asleep a huge % of the population is.
Wesley Hunt. Successfully ran for Congress.
https://www.congress.gov/member/wesley-hunt/H001095
Here is where the pause clip is extracted:
Who was he referring to when he said the name Wesley?
https://greatawakening.win/p/17t1W2IcgX/four-more-years-pause/c/
I don't monitor it too closely but IMO it seems much less manipulated than GME and others.
Basically no one can explain GME. Massive retail buy interest but steady downward trend. Price action and volume have no relation to company news.
I think everyone would agree that DJT is highly speculative in nature and it's value essentially boils down to what Trump can do with it. The lack of share availability is indicative of most insiders holding.
People were mocking it for no reason. What is a parent to do? Not monitor it? Monitor it for the kid but not themselves? Why is it a controversy?
I can only reason that this is an attack through innuendo, or that they have something more potent that they're holding back as leverage, and reminding him of it.
I do wonder if Trump would selectively allow himself to be jailed. He could perhaps time it to only spend a day or two in there on the weakest of the cases.
Get the credibility, enjoy the media circus that would be insane, and most importantly: set the precedent.
There are going to be a lot of perp walks that will be easier to digest once Trump has gone first.
I can think of a few reasons.
-
Tension release designed to mark the end of the operation and help disperse the crowd. I recall at the time that news of the shooting spread through the crowd and having a sort of numbing effect, taking the energy level down, etc.
-
Event designed to incite the crowd. The opposite of option one, of course. The event just didn't seem to manifest escalating characteristics though.
-
As u/aumoune suggests, the event was needed to fulfill some sort of legal requirements w/respect to a legal definition, e.g. insurrection or posse comitatus act:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Insurrection_Act_of_1807
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posse_Comitatus_Act
The President may employ the armed forces ... to ... restore public order and enforce the laws of the United States when, as a result of a natural disaster, epidemic, or other serious public health emergency, terrorist attack or incident, or other condition ... the President determines that ... domestic violence has occurred to such an extent that the constituted authorities of the State or possession are incapable of maintaining public order ... or [to] suppress, in a State, any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy if such ... a condition ... so hinders the execution of the laws ... that any part or class of its people is deprived of a right, privilege, immunity, or protection named in the Constitution and secured by law ... or opposes or obstructs the execution of the laws of the United States or impedes the course of justice under those laws.[17]
Whenever the President considers that unlawful obstructions, combinations, or assemblages, or rebellion against the authority of the United States, make it impracticable to enforce the laws of the United States in any State by the ordinary course of judicial proceedings, he may call into Federal service such of the militia of any State, and use such of the armed forces, as he considers necessary to enforce those laws or to suppress the rebellion.
So maybe the refusal of Pelosi and Bowser to protect the Cpaitol were cover for POTUS to invoke something.
I enjoy these but honestly I can't match any of the info he's suggesting. When I pull up the moon phase stuff based on the general latlng of the image I get different results.
It might be fun to take another of the tokens and see if they cross reference somehow. E.g. here is Seattle, maybe Glacier and Mount Adams in the background?
There was some stuff scheduled for the 23rd that got moved to May 7. Seems like more is lining up then.
https://restructuring.ra.kroll.com/bbby/Home-DocketInfo
I think PP said it best though: the deal is gonna be announced when it's announced. What we're getting from the dockets and the tinfoil is similar to what Q gave anons: enough info to confirm that there is a plan, but little in the way of specifics.
And it must be said, if anyone is not tuning into the ppshow, you're really missing out on premium docket faggotry. The show truly makes bankruptcy court entertaining.
Agree that it feels like in reality Trump is arguing against immunity.
Most important though is simply defining the terms of conflict. When does immunity apply? Get it defined and understood by the public.
Then white hats will prosecute the former presidents in line with that standard. Doesn't really matter what SC decides. Plenty of valid interpretations.