You know the creator of Dragon Ball/Dragon Quest/Chrono Trigger (and many other creations) was a real one when there’s more people globally mourning his loss than the queen of England at her passing. I never cry over famous people passing away, but this one hit me hard.
Anime is truly the only content left with real stories and for the most part doesn't pander woke agenda bullshit (outside of translators trying to inject it after the fact).
RIP Akira Toriyama and thank you so much for being one of the core foundations of our lives.
They are trying to force God's hand.
Whenever I come across people who claim that we are witnessing revelations, this is what I am thinking about.
Sounds like these people need a career pivot into learning how to code.
The written words in the Bible are correct, todays geographical location is not correct. The Wailing Wall is the remains of a Roman fortress named Fort Antonia, built north of the actual temple site where no protruding rock ever existed, but rather was built upon the Dehan Spring.
The rock upon which the dome of the rock was built adjoining the western wall, was actually the centerpiece around which Fort Antonia was built.
There is nothing sacred about this rock or this wall. The Wailing Wall is the seat of a satanic ritual, outlined by the 13th century Jewish occult system known as the Kabbalah, expounded into the Zohar and expanded upon further by the 18th century Kasthetic movement.
The so called divine presence at the Wailing Wall is actually the Kabbalistic feminine emanation of their false god, the Shefi Na.
Rabbi's perform their prescribed prayer movement called "Dovening" to the Wailing Wall, in which the Jew copulates with the Shekinah in order to give birth to an erotic union with the Einsoft, the Kabbalistic masculine emanation of their false god.
Leaders that perform the right to political passage at the Wailing Wall (Rand Paul, Clinton, Obama, McCain, Bush, Romney, etc.) is similar to the ritual's in Hollywood for stardom, in that they are shaking hands with the devil.
Federal Reserve currency is the same thing as a cashless society. This is no different and until we've abolished the fed, we will continue to be wage slaves.
Trending on TikTok as well: Where's the list Jimmy Fallon?
Parents who use their kids to virtue signal anything are terrible people.
Not only did they go into an iceberg field, upon leaving the port, someone had sabotaged one of the boilers.
What if one were to approach this differently depending on who's asking the question? (Or other factors, such as laziness?)
For example:
If someone who typically annoys me or isn't well known to me asks the question, I would typically go with the quick drive-by answer "outside" and move on with my life. Probably also do the same if I'm lazy and don't want to answer the question with depth.
But, if a friend or an acquaintance that I have personally determined to contain the skills to disseminate information asks, I typically take the time to inquire further and address the reasoning behind the question.
Looks to be completely demolished here: https://twitter.com/disclosetv/status/1544806055212883968?s=20&t=DHHDSgbLCBi_xZilmBNgRg
I've been talking about solar cycles changing earths climate for decades and everyone thought that I was crazy.
The satanic cabal banned pot because it caused awakenings in the early 1900's.
This IS indoctrination of them attempting to make pedophilia normalized. It's fucking disgusting.
Any parent and participant who supports this madness is a perpetrator of child sex abuse, PERIOD.
Brothers and sisters, please for the love of god HOMESCHOOL your kids.
I find that it's easier to understand people when they utilize the logical side of their brain, setting aside the emotions for proper discourse that others could potentially learn from.
Emotions running one's mouth will shift a possibly smart discussion topic into weird directions.
Slinging insults at people to get a point across while also failing to discuss the matter with people of differing opinions is asinine. Generalizing people into a group for an opinion because of a disagreement with that opinion is an emotional discharge at best and fails to bring any meaningful insight to the table.
People sometimes need a nudge to use logic more often around here.
Can we get someone with market skills in this thread to debate?
While people may agree/disagree with @rageous statement, I think a well thought out discussion about it is appropriate.
Maybe, depends on what the objective is.
You could also look at this with the angle that those members of his family being double agents. Or, they were placed into that position to expose other things, who knows really. Keep in mind that the level of corruption that the US is involved in goes pretty damn deep, anything is possible.
It seems like most doomers only look at stuff from a single perspective and argue from that single perspective because wrapping their mind around any other possibilities is too much for them to ascertain.
The aspect of them disabling it after mandating, sure that makes sense.
Disabling it BEFORE upgrading all of their apps that require such protocols, does not make sense.
I'll debate it, every family has ignorant and naïve people within them. We've seen plenty of folks get on here and talk about how their siblings are blinded by stupidity.
Just because Mary Trump and Ivanka Trump are possibly ignorant, does NOT mean that the rest of them are inherently ignorant.
Keep your friends close, enemies closer.
Sometimes you must walk through the darkness before you see the light.
We've found that if TLS 1.1 and 1.2 is disabled, anything M365 will run erratically, which is kind of funny because Windows will install with these options disabled by default.
The conservative bot narrative that they pushed back in 2017-2020 was a p r o j e c t i o n of their own meddling with actual bots.
This is a very interesting poll for me. As a software architect who works in big tech, what I find the most fascinating is that most of the core component/backend developers tend to lean conservative or non-political, whilst the front-end developers tend to lean more left.
Now, this is not to say that all front-end developers are liberal and all back-end are conservative, but with nearly 20 years of experience in this field, it has been my experience to find them coalesced in separate groups like this at larger companies.
Here is a very high level summary of what frontend/backend consist of:
Backend: Things like network transport layers, container orchestration, kernel development, core database development, things that are written in assembly, C or C++. The foundation or infrastructure of things so-to-speak.
Frontend: Web languages like HTML, Javascript, UI, API things, elevated languages such as C#, Python, etc.
It makes sense that Oracle, being a huge database and core development platform, and with a large emphasis in direct hardware programming (think Sun Microsystems acquisition), has such a large base of conservatives in comparison to everything else out there in the big tech world. Also, willing to bet that most of the 8.3% of conservatives that work at Microsoft are mostly in kernel, cloud and operating system development.
To build something complex requires thinking outside of the box, something that the left seemingly has a hard time doing. I find my more liberal leaning colleagues copying and pasting code from stack exchange, albeit slightly modified to fit whatever project they are working on and calling it a day a good chunk of the time (in most cases, it doesn't work as they had confusingly intended and requires intervention on the commit, hence the common stereotypical jokes with regard to stack exchange).
They also ask the most questions directed to backend things that have been answered before numerous times, as if it didn't "click", when pressed as to why their push to production didn't execute as flawlessly as they had intended. Commonly blaming the infrastructure, or the OS, or anything else they deem as problematic, rather than looking to themselves as the problem.
The conservatives are the "Atlas" holding up the world, if Atlas shrugs, everything else falls apart.
Very interesting poll indeed.
Elon admitted that he was for socialist healthcare, but freedom loving capitalist for everything else on the particular subjects of trade and healthcare. While the two are currently one, he appears to be more split on the matter of being partial with constitutional freedom of trade and socialistic healthcare. I would say it's more akin to being agnostic - sitting on the fence.
He reminds me more of a centrist John Jacob Astor IV than a Nikola Tesla (The two being significant friends).
Edit - Adding sources for Elon's comments on this matter:
Nitter: https://nitter.net/elonmusk/status/1008438394559451136#m
Twitter: https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1008438394559451136
I have all of you now, consider that a net increase.
That was my question as well. Along with the firmament, how do extraterrestrials fit into our narrative when Genesis 1 never mentions creations of other intelligent beings beyond those created in the image of god here on earth?