1
qdixon 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm not claiming that lithium batteries are the way to go - but rather that the batteries and cars can be designed for a fast swap, and swap stations can be built for charging and swaps. And swaps could be done in about a minute.

And you're right that with current designs it would be logistically impossible.

4
qdixon 4 points ago +4 / -0

It's going to be a very long uphill climb for Netflix - As long as the Obama's are featured.

6
qdixon 6 points ago +6 / -0

This is a fair comment, but the question remains as to whether or not E-vehicles are better environmentally than gas vehicles - which partially depends on where the electricity comes from.

But the fueling station bottleneck can be solved by swapping in fully charged batteries in exchange for the ones that have been depleted.

by BQnita
2
qdixon 2 points ago +2 / -0

"no one is talking about this" because anyone who's been paying attention already knows that it's happening ...

Except for corrupt authoritarian toadies who will remain in denial - until their heroes are convicted.

1
qdixon 1 point ago +1 / -0

Chorus from the John Prine song - Spanish Pipedream

"Blow up your TV, Throw away your paper, Go to the country, Build you a home, Plant a little garden, Eat a lot of peaches, Try an' find Jesus on your own"

11
qdixon 11 points ago +11 / -0

Nice. Except the police should be called at 2 instead of 9.

2
qdixon 2 points ago +2 / -0

Interesting that this is from Zerohedge - as they tend to be pretty careful about what they include in their feed.

4
qdixon 4 points ago +4 / -0

I'm not so sure they've fallen - Eer aan Oekraine or Glory to Ukraine sounds somewhat satirical.

1
qdixon 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thank you for this. I read the summary from linkedin and my sense was that it could have been written in support of the deep state as they try to purge organizations of all kinds from what they consider questionable content.

Of course i hope that's not the case.

by IAmOne
10
qdixon 10 points ago +10 / -0

At the rate we're going $300 worth of groceries is going to cost $3,000 - and fit in a single bag.

1
qdixon 1 point ago +1 / -0

Was this a clinical study - or a that follow-up tracking study of vaccinations up to February 2021? We do have a huge problem, and as time goes by we will likely find that more than 2.8% of those vaccinated will end up with lives that are shortened as a result.

But I can't imagine that the number of Relevant Cases shown in the graphic is 93% of those vaccinated.

11
qdixon 11 points ago +11 / -0

Thank you for this update.

We know that our own mockingbird media lies with absolutely no regard for our safety, and everyone has propaganda as sometimes disinformation is necessary.

But my gut says that this is a close to the truth as we're going to get.

5
qdixon 5 points ago +5 / -0

The speculation is interesting, but at this point I mostly just hope that the Q team is able to help us avoid a nuclear holocaust. And it feels like figuring out all these details is somewhat above my pay grade.

But another way to look at this is that @Q is real - even if it's the Babylon Bee version of Q, and if the messaging is a combination of truth bombs and disinformation it will still get a lot of attention.

4
qdixon 4 points ago +4 / -0

Okay. Thank you I guess. Though I'm not totally sure that this isn't just another psyop ploy to get us to back off.

Seriously though. Thank you!

-3
qdixon -3 points ago +1 / -4

It is sad. From my perspective, you're repeating the same "facts" that you've already mentioned - without really knowing anything about me - and quoting innuendo and hit pieces on Tulsi.

But anyway, we all take some time for self reflection, and imho being kind and gracious with each other makes us stronger.

As long as we're on the same path forward.

-3
qdixon -3 points ago +1 / -4

What happened to unity? Believe it or not we're probably pretty close on policy, corruption, the horrific state of the world - and the need for what we're doing here to be successful. And I hope we can ultimately focus on doing what we can to change things instead of arguing.

Tulsi did criticize Trump - but she also supported a lot of what he did. Having John Bolton speaking for the administration was hard to take, so Trump also had to put up with some crap in order to get past it. And what he as able to accomplish given all the roadblocks was incredible.

I did support Tulsi for the dem nomination, and I'm tired of seeing her slandered here with the same kind of half-truths that are used by the legacy media to smear Donald Trump. It's sad. Not a huge deal at the moment, but it's sad to have people jumping to conclusions, and lumping people (Tulsi and those of us have supported her) together with the worst of the worst who are actively trying to destroy our country.

-4
qdixon -4 points ago +3 / -7

I spent a lot of time with Tulsi in New Hampshire - and I think she'd make a great president. (I've been an Independent all my life, pro-Goldwater in 1964, and voted for Jill Stein and Donald Trump in 2016 and 2020.)

Tulsi really won me over when she called out the CIA at a campaign stop. Her biggest issue is war and peace - and she's a true warrior who understands security - and has devoted a good part of her life to keeping us safe - doing 2 tours in the mid-east, the first as an enlisted soldier, and the second as an officer. As a warrior Tulsi has the credibility to work for peace - outside of the narrative that's promoted by our new world order military and political industrial complex establishment.

Tulsi has introduced and co-sponsored a decent amount of legislation, but some of the most important was ignored. She twice introduced a Secure America's Elections Act, which called for paper ballots (or better). In retrospect (and even at the time), it was clear why the Dem party - and the RINOs didn't support it.

Tulsi did destroy Kamala, but more significantly she also called out Hillary as an evil warmonger. And she also sued Google for the way they manipulated her account.

Part of Tulsi's approach is to see things for herself, as evidenced by quite a few things including her trip to Syria and meeting with Assad. She certainly wasn't pro-Assad, but she did question events that have since been confirmed as false flags.

I don't agree with Tulsi on everything, especially with the extent to which she's supported the Dem party. (But at least she resigned as a vice-chair of the DNC when she refused to support Hillary's candidacy.) Her endorsement of Biden was lukewarm (and when she ran as a dem she agreed to support the dem candidate). And she's been very outspoken and critical of a lot of what Biden has done.

I could go on - if anyone wants to talk about specific issues.

Anyway, I don't expect that Tulsi will run again - even though I'd love to see her pick up the pieces after the current corrupt dem party is destroyed. But if Tulsi is ever treated with any respect by the media, she'd do particularly well with the 40% of us who are independents. And I think she'd help unify the country if it ever made sense for her to run for VP as a republican.

4
qdixon 4 points ago +4 / -0

This would have been even better if Novak Djokovic came right out and said that his chances of being the greatest ever depends on getting though these trying times - without being jabbed.

It's seriously hard to imagine that over time vaccinated tennis players will be able to beat someone who's immune system hasn't been compromised.

9
qdixon 9 points ago +10 / -1

Sorry, but it's hard to think of something that's going to kill some of our friends as awesome.

4
qdixon 4 points ago +4 / -0

As a US citizen, I find the prospect of Sidney Powell presenting our case to be kind of exciting.

3
qdixon 3 points ago +3 / -0

Wasn't Matt Whitaker a temporary Attorney General? I have a vague recollection of being somewhat disappointed that there weren't more changes, but Whitaker doing a lot of little things - plus something pretty significant to more thing forward.

Can someone fill in the gaps?

view more: Next ›