2
rahu77 2 points ago +2 / -0

This video is amazingly accurate.

The attention to detail is impressive right down to the boxed soy drink on his desk.

2
rahu77 2 points ago +2 / -0

I really enjoy a good Trump caricature.

They did a good job on his hair in this one.

11
rahu77 11 points ago +11 / -0

Ron Paul is what drew my attention to the overt media manipulation of elections.

They wouldn't even say his NAME on air they were so terrified of him because he was openly going after the Federal Reserve and pushing for a gold standard.

The media literally pretended he wasn't running.

4
rahu77 4 points ago +4 / -0

This means the Post Office has election fraud cells, every one of them, which activate during the election cycles.

3
rahu77 3 points ago +3 / -0

Part of me is excited there's a new study, then I get sad when no one I know who is a democrat reads new studies.

2
rahu77 2 points ago +2 / -0

So this brings to light the question:

If rule of law becomes what can be enforced by use of force, then that would make a 2A uprising legal.

If those who govern without conscent disregard the law, doesn't that mean the bulk if citizens can do the same to re-install the actual rule of law?

6
rahu77 6 points ago +6 / -0

I used to tell the lefties at work they were the minority re: wearing masks.

They would argue and point out everyone was wearing one, but that was only because it was required.

As soon as the mask shit went optional, less than 10% wore them and now only a small handful of hold-outs wear them.

They are the minority and they know it.

3
rahu77 3 points ago +3 / -0

Friend of mine literally sprinkled 9mm shell casings and beer bottle caps all across his truck's dashboard with a sign in the side window:

Warning: Driver only carrries $20 in ammunition after dark.

10
rahu77 10 points ago +10 / -0

re: the SCOTUS case "this time"

"This time" SCOTUS has the testimony of the Sussman and Danchencko (spelling) trials.

The ones that outed the Clinton Foundation and FBI compliance with the plot.

There's also all the events up to this point that show the current ruling Democrats are thwarting every check and balance in the system put in place to prevent this from going all out civil war.

I remember when SCOTUS tossed a case over concerns of BLM rioting further, imagine when they realize the people have a constitutional right and historical precedent to shut down this shit show because the electoral system was compromised and the government no longer has the conscent of the governed.

2
rahu77 2 points ago +2 / -0

It will be a devolved department operating under the authority provided in the PEAD relating to it.

After the election but before Jan 6th, remember the letters back and forth from the budget office discussing Biden and Harris needing to submit their budgets for the transition.

During that time, there were changes made regarding career diplomats within the executive branch. Prior these deepstate career diplomats could originate documentation to kick off processes but after these changes they could not. Only the actual elected official could originate the proper paperwork to begin a process.

Taking away from that, Patel Patriots devolution theory, there's authority that was passed down to the lowest level needed in order to achieve this directive.

After all that, my guess is the Local Sheriffs. The PEADs include tasking for special operations teams to cooridate with the Local Sheriffs all the resources they will need to execute their task. They link Sheriffs with intelligence, strategic planning, and funding.

That's my best guess.

17
rahu77 17 points ago +17 / -0

Blue coated redpill.

Brilliant.

Disclaimer - check

Says he's a Democrat - check

Repeated some of dumbest anti-trump talkin points - check

Spoke some real truth - check

Everything needed for him to be "safe" to listen to. (blue coated)

You could hear the audience holding their breathe several times because they weren't sure what was going to happen. Then he'd subtly drop an off hand redpills and people would giggle away the tension. Just wonderful to watch.

by BQnita
1
rahu77 1 point ago +1 / -0

I could see where the DS would be really pissed off about this.

If their own CHS gives exonorating testimony that the Oath Keepers didn't do what the J6 panel is claiming, then how can they discredit or attack their own CI?

If the CHS gives testimony that hurts the defense then the defense can claim the CHS works for the prosecution.

This is shining a light on the J6 panel ignoring testimony from their own informants that don't follow the narrative. This is one of the few we know about. Imagine all the CHS reports that had to get thrown out to hide the fact that this whole thing is a sham.....

6
rahu77 6 points ago +6 / -0

^ This

The mail collectors were told to drop ALL ballots that were in people's mailboxes AFTER the election into a special marked bin at the Post Office. Those whistleblowers were then the people told to go through that bin and back-date the post mark, and deliver them.

Only the cheating Dems making bulk fake ballots would be the people dropping handfuls of "late" ballots into their mailboxes at this point. No legit voter would expect their ballot to be delivered and counted at that point.

So the late ballots were like 100% for Biden at the time, when they sampled some of the states during audits these batches were 100% blue and most ignored the down ballot choices, only marked for Biden.

FBI silenced the truck driver and the guy from the Post Office who went on record. That was as smoking gun as we'll get and it was buried by Fraud-BI.

5
rahu77 5 points ago +5 / -0

It would be a pro-audit and election security Governor+SecState+AG+Sherif in one location with a mandate to fix it.

With enough control in the legislature to prevent any blockage.

2
rahu77 2 points ago +2 / -0

I haven't seen anyone call him a liar yet.

They attack the messenger and ignore the merits of the message.

I think its ludicris to allow dual-citizens to hold office.

If I make a football analogy, its like having 1 person be the offensive coordinator for one team and the defensive coordinator for another at the same time. Everything is great until the 2 teams face each other. Where do the loyalties go in a situation like that.

With an "America First" policy, maybe now it makes more sense why our elected officials so vehemently reject that notion even though that's the job for the office they hold.

Major corporations take their shareholders into account more than our country currently takes their citizens. When our country is viewed as a corporation, then it's clear the politicians do not see the citizens are shareholders.

Who would the shareholders be then if not the citizens?

3
rahu77 3 points ago +3 / -0

He needed to do SOMETHING to counter .MIL sending in troops to "help".

These Poll Monitors will probably pull jurdistiction bullshit to try to hinder anything the NG tries to do.

Just guessing, its the only reason why this would happen AFTER NG announced they are in play.

You know Garland is dirty AF otherwise these DOJ monitors would be there to assist the NG. Not a seperate mission/command structure. I mean we're supposed to be on the same team right? right?

2
rahu77 2 points ago +2 / -0

Tell me you are a useless body of corrupt globalists without telling me.

2
rahu77 2 points ago +2 / -0

So Musk has access to ALL the communications Baker sent from his Twitter devices, email accounts, DMs,etc.

And all the stuff they thought was behind attorney client priviledge too since Musk is technically the client now.

Even if Baker scrambled to "delete it", it can be dug out of the backups.

They have it all.

12
rahu77 12 points ago +12 / -0

Just look at how Tulsi acted during the election cycle.

She stayed in long enough to syphon votes off other Dem candidates, then folded up her campaign and sent all her electors to BIden.

She's controlled opposition and she's lost her value presenting as a moderate democrat so we'll see her shift more center/independant to syphon off support from non-establishment candiates.

She's a veteran, who swore an oath to uphold and defend the constitution and still sent her electors to Biden.

That's all I needed to know.

1
rahu77 1 point ago +1 / -0

At some point you would think the military would step in and say that selling our oil reserves so Hunter's company can take a profit is against the national defense.

2
rahu77 2 points ago +2 / -0

When I left my job during covid, i was able to completely cash out. I took the tax hit but was free and clear with 100% of the remaining post-tax funds.

Took about 2 weeks after my last day, before the money was deposited. Got a statement about the taxes withheld that I referenced during tax season this year.

No penalties because I was leaving the company, a seperation. It's one of the events that allows you to pull clear of it.

Call them and ask. There's loans from yourself too, but that wasn't necessary in my case.

6
rahu77 6 points ago +7 / -1

My guess, is that in a civil war which side the military picks is an important factor.

Traditionally it's been largely the patriots which join .mil so if you were a scummy democrate who wanted to turn the .mil against the people, you'd have to change the demographics of it first or you end up purging most of it.

They've been purging conservatives/christians for a while, now they're filling the ranks with the woke.

28
rahu77 28 points ago +28 / -0

That's exactly what I was thinking.

If people notice, now when the flu shot is advertised, it's "Sign up for your Flu and/or Covid-19 vaccine booster."

It's this and/or bullshit in the wording now tells me a TON of people are going to get this exact "OOPs you wanted a flu shot but we accidently gave you another booster, We're sorry, it's just our form is so hard to read."

5
rahu77 5 points ago +5 / -0

As harsh of a statement as it was, and if I recall correctly, it was in regards to not fighting for a better deal with the Dems at all, but rubber stamping approval and rolling over in complacency with the spending. There's tactics where he could delay things but he's not using them.

It shows he's with them 100%. It shows Mitch might as well be a Democrat if he's not going to do his job in any way.

Like a baseball game where your teams first basemen comes out onto the field wearing the other teams uniform and listens to the other teams line coaches.

It shows he's taking part in the treason along with them. Not trying to slow or mitigate their damage but actively helping it at this point.

What's the punishment for treason again?

That's what I got from the comment, as dark as it was, it was true. If Mitch is going to openly commit treason, this late in the game. He's 100% all in with them. Irredeemably part of it. Dare say an essential part of it.

This tells me that Mitch is probably one of the worst offenders and they have some of the most fucked up blackmail on him,

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›