Cloud seeding is not what's controversial. That tech is documented and has been used for decades. Even the most NPC "scientism" debunkers know and acknowlede that.
The controversy is around specific claims regarding Geoengineering (NOT seeding); its tech, prevalence, and what has constituted evidence of such.
A different perspective from a post of a long time lawyer friend, who is very MAGA but disagrees with the admin on this:
"Judge Boasberg, whom I have not met but know by reputation, is not a far-left judge nor one of the crazy lefties. He is a sober judge, well respected and well liked by all who practice before him.
"Judge Boasberg had no choice but to rule as he did given the rules of procedure and existing case law. He issued a TRO to preserve the status quo pending a hearing on the preliminary injunction. That is standard operating procedure in federal courts according to the FRCP. Any judge would have done the same. You hold the status quo until you can study the problem and figure out who is right within 10-15 days. The emergency petition required a snap judgment devoid of any time to study the problem. Judge Boasberg did nothing wrong; what would have been wrong would have been to depart from the law and the FRCP.
"Boasberg merely issued a TRO, good for ten days, until the merits can be reached at a follow up hearing in 10 days. That is SOP for federal courts. I think it likely that the statute does not apply to authorize deportations without hearing, so there may be a problem on the merits.. It's also possible the deportees had due process rights to a hearing before being deported. That, again, is basic law in the U.S. and not something nefarious cooked up by Judge Boasberg. Congress may need to enact clear law authorizing these kinds of deportations."
Not so sure about that. https://rense.com/general86/rebut.htm
IMHO Ian is an op. He has quickly risen to the top in the Red Pill community, rehashing theories and garnering street cred, going on large platforms to distill these rehashed theories but in a specific framework, among other things framing red pill topics within specific boundaries highly compatible with the current Accelerationist Technocracy takeover that shoehorned its way into the Trump camp.
We'll see how this unfolds in coming months and years. I for one am opting out of any MAGA certified tech restructuring of society.
Rogan is an op as well, until proven otherwise. His format has all the characteristics of a modern Asch experiment.
This was a 19th century vision by Manifest Destiny done the correct, non-genocidal way. It was of course subverted by British imperial maneuvers. Great article about this: https://counterinformation.wordpress.com/2020/06/04/history-the-1887-alaska-purchase-and-the-us-russia-bering-strait-rail-tunnel-project/
Here's more recent history about Alaska/Canada: https://risingtidefoundation.net/2024/10/05/the-strategic-importance-of-the-alaska-canada-railway/
It is unfortunate, cruel, and the high cost of deferred compliance.
By the same token, there are many non-liberal, particularly elderly, MAGA are also dying off earlier than otherwise after ingesting Trump's Warp Speed messaging, making decisions based on that. If you think just from personal experience that demographic doesn't exist, or is a miniscule amount of "collateral damage", that's more of a cope than understanding the varying kinds of compliant obedience that has been out there.
Wrong wrong, my joo-anon. Marx was anti Semitic by proxy in his specific anti capitalist rants in context of that era. Tikhistory's YT channel has plenty of detailed proof of that.
And full fledged Communism? Well that was a Brit psy op to blame on the Jews. Churchill was involved. Richard Poe's new book documents that make-groyper-big-mad history quite thoroughly.
Or ideally, just aggressively excise (exorcise) all the globalist BS permeating the UN. The original UN charter is not a bad thing, it recognizes and honors national sovereignty in the course of pursuing sensible, common sense strategies for international conflict resolution. That can work without all the Fabians / eugenicists / globalists treating the org as their psychotic playground running rough shod over any national protections.
AI by nature is a collectivization and centralization of what is traditionally dispersed, individualistic, and in alignment with natural rights.
The ordinary citizen has no epistemic basis to distinguish between "good actors" vs "bad actors" deploying and managing AI initiatives. OF COURSE they will all, no matter their motives and ultimate goals, position themselves as harmless, benevolent technological optimists seeking to improve everyone's quality of life.
One of the exact predictions (biometric collection and management in the name of pubic health advancements) why I did not vote for DJT this time. Expect more of this, the Technocrat-occultists are, clearly, deeply embedded in this admin. Including MAHA players.
Pretty cult like these days with this Technocrat. Elon (and MTG) can't help themselves simping and cybertruck advertising in the midst of commenting on a domestic terrorist attack.
This is a big clue for what's more to come. The domestic sleeper cell with battlefield ready IED narrative (ok so it was just Coleman fuel cans and fireworks) -> proving we need to further all kinds A.I. enabled security tech wrapping around the entire society, and society will gladly embrace it, because ISIS in the U.S. Never let a source of fear and panic go by without advancing a new order.
Wait until, I predict some day, Neuralink will provide pre-crime security for all of us helpless victims to the next bogeymen.
Cloud seeding is real and documented, no one denies it. Mass scale Geoengineering is a distinct concept and that's what's controversial. Whether it is real or not, the problem is it factually is surrounded by die hard believers making dubious claims, poor logic/ lack of evidence or very flimsy evidence, fake whistleblowers, and intel assets like Dane WIgington.