3
Strelnieks 3 points ago +3 / -0

In addition, there were also a couple of muh JFK Jr is alive posts...

2
Strelnieks 2 points ago +2 / -0

Good doggo as always. Yeah, all ships rock in tides that disrupt the pond equilibrium... good thing frogs can float and swim!

4
Strelnieks 4 points ago +4 / -0

F*kin aye, well said anon!

SR mindset is the model that the Q plan has for all of those who've yet to awaken: Realize you've been deceived and allow truth to guide you.

RIP Seth Rich, Gonzalo Lira, and all of the other truth bastions that have been unfairly snuffed out of the game.

2
Strelnieks 2 points ago +2 / -0

It is being made clearer in the sense that the normies have to be reverse socially engineered on a massive scale... and have been for years now.

Some conditioning is just more difficult to reverse than others on an individual basis. Gotta get down to that >10% threshold. Could be years more from now...

5
Strelnieks 5 points ago +5 / -0

And that's why the debt clock site is nothing more than an infotainment distraction.

Anons dont & shouldn't spend their days waiting on the mystique veracity of a website to manifest. Be the change you want to see. Don't search for hopium in a 10 seconds to midnight doom aggregate clock site.

3
Strelnieks 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yes, yes, and yes.

For crying out loud, there is a jannie comment below praising one of the biggest paytriot grifters (Wayne Williot aka Juan O Conman) to ever leech off of anons and the Q phenomenon!

Additionally, I would concur that none of these people are insiders in any shape or form. They are opportunistic sophists capitalizing off of their audience's demand for hopium.

Infotainment at best, parasitic snake oil salesmen at worst.

2
Strelnieks 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's where all of this kayfabe is leading. MAGA has always been the majority... even before there was MAGA.

TC is playing his CC role masterfully.

10
Strelnieks 10 points ago +10 / -0

Your plan is working out as intended it looks like fren! Congratulations on the happy family and healthy baby and may your blessings continue!

Oh, and happy Independence Day wknd! 🇺🇸 🐸

1
Strelnieks 1 point ago +1 / -0

Clanderpstein doth doometh too much... or perhaps that's the point. Trying to get folks riled up.

3
Strelnieks 3 points ago +3 / -0

Agreed and stress the same. I read it last year when Kurp recommended it. Not only one big stage, but the book ties everything together nicely. Not all scatterbrained like the Pepe Silvia Meme.

1
Strelnieks 1 point ago +1 / -0

Does it matter when speaking with individuals whose minds are addled by conflabulation?

Self censoring in order to placate is often abused by those you intend to please.

2
Strelnieks 2 points ago +2 / -0

Take note of Salem Media pundits. They're on Brad Parscale's FARA payroll.

2
Strelnieks 2 points ago +2 / -0

No worries, not much difference in the two MSM stooges anyway. And you're absolutely correct, the man is an abhorrent monster!

3
Strelnieks 3 points ago +3 / -0

Laura fucking Ingraham on FOX gave Alifantis that interview and wrapped it all up, which after all we learned made me sooo sick.

That was Megyn Kelly not Laura Ingraham.... unless he did two interviews?

Agreed tho, totally revolting habbening when it occured Winter of 2016.

1
Strelnieks 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes, yes it did. Many more times to follow I would wager.

1
Strelnieks 1 point ago +1 / -0

No one is arguing against the message or principal behind any Q drop. You're using that as a strawman argument in favor of MegaAnon against a very plebeian source I shared.

Are we to expect the general public to not defaultly refer to Q as Qanon given the fact the MSM campaign (among others) socially engineered the incorrect nomenclature of the Q phenomenon?

Furthermore, the article I shared isn't against the veracity of the Q drops. Solely MegaAnon. By comparison it gives legitimate credence to the Q drops VS MegaAnon posts.

Let's use a completely hypothetical yet similar example: Random pundit puts out an article in favor of Q's legitimacy compared to MegaAnon but incorrectly uses the "Qanon" moniker. So that automatically makes the article null?

1
Strelnieks 1 point ago +1 / -0

I also agree with those opinions fren, so know that you're not alone in that corner of the pond.

I'd go a step further in the path you've cleared and say that serialbrain2 is also janky and bogus. Regardless of the one-time very early in their posting "career" that Q quoted him, he used that one-time reference to do the same thing IntheMatrixxx did with their reference... create a paytriot model following.

view more: Next ›