Yes, it was supposedly after her live interview with Lauer. At the time, she was also quoted as saying she was going to destroy Matt Lauer’s career as revenge. When a few months later Lauer was cancelled, it lended more credibility to the rumor.
If you are the U.S. Military and you are trying to take down a worldwide secret cabal of string-pullers, the logical strategy would seem to be to take out the top of the pyramid first, not last by building up to it from the bottom. Once the top of the pyramid is under control, the footsoldiers and puppets can be made to do anything. The 4am talking points could be hijacked and then continued under secret military control. How would a Don Lemon or Anderson Cooper know the difference? They will repeat whatever their masters tell them to repeat.
It would be naive to think that simply rounding up the puppet masters would stop the agenda, as the puppets and footsoldiers and propagandists do form a cohesive enough web that they could reorient and restructure themselves under new masters. But if they were ordered to self-destruct and dismantle themselves, that could potentially work.
I think many people on the left would be on our team if they weren’t inside a TV bubble where everything is a Clown World inversion. I believe most of them think it’s not possible that so many anti-Trump people could be wrong. They don’t see that all those different voices are hooked to the puppet strings of six corporations. They don’t see the uniformity of the narrative as suspicious, they see it as confirmation.
I don’t think he could have navigated the Mueller special council like Trump did. It’s easy to say you’re going to “take down” the Deep State, but to actually do it you need a fighter. I think Vivek still wants to play nice.
It’s the same thing as muh 97% of climate scientists agree. Ignore the claim, point to the number. That’s why they don’t like to describe any one individual charge, because separately they all sound absurd. But the number alone sounds dodgy.
He reminds me of Dr. Ben Carson. Smart and good at speaking, plus his skin color protects him, but he isn’t ready to go into battle against the Deep State and the cabal. He’s still one step away from basic Republican appeasement strategy, meaning he wants to intellectually disagree but emotionally appease. I appreciate the intellectual disagreement but Trump emotionally disagrees too, and that’s what really triggers the liberals to expose their true beliefs and intentions.
It’s like how the whole leftist progressive obsession with virtue signalling started with people who were actually handicapped: people in wheelchairs, the deaf, the blind. At the time it didn’t seem unreasonable to people to give the handicapped some extra privileges in society to make up for their disadvantage.
Then the leftists used Marxism to warp this idea of kindness to the handicapped into a victim hierarchy of racial and sexual identities. Now the most “disadvantaged” people weren’t in wheelchairs, they weren’t deaf, they weren’t blind - no, they were the people who really really liked anal sex. The sodomites, they were the true victims. Oh and the blacks. Forget about the deaf and blind, Michael Jordan is over here and look at him with his poor, disadvantaged skin. Morgan Freeman, he’s the real victim. Jay Z, feel sorry for him.
When was the last time anyone’s seen a leftist give a shit about a blind person? Or a deaf person? They put muzzles on the mouths of every person and put deaf people who relied on lip reading into a world of silence, cutting them off from the rest of us. Ever heard a liberal bring this up? Of course not! They don’t give a fuck. Beyoncé, she’s the one really suffering, out on her yacht with her poor, poor black skin.
I like Trump Jr. because it would be Trump by proxy and he’s the most likely to be loyal to MAGA. To me he would be the safe bet. I like Lake too, especially her fight against Election Fraud, but she also sort of came out of nowhere like DeSantis and MTG so I am cautious about that. I get a good vibe from Jim Jordan though.
Whoever Trump chooses as his successor will probably be our choice though. If we trust Trump, then it would make sense to trust who he chooses.
I don’t see how it would be possible for them NOT to hate white Christians.
Think about it.
Before Jesus, they were The Chosen People. They were the special boys, waiting on the Messiah.
But when the Messiah comes, instead of telling them what special boys they all are, He tells them they AREN’T special boys at all. Then He rewrites their Holy Book and opens the religion to all people around the world equally and forever.
How do they react to this?
They basically go into JDS. Jesus Derangement Syndrome. They decide they need to kill Jesus. Yeah, that’s the ticket! That’s what will stop this movement.
Oops! Biggest backfire ever. They get their Crucifixion, but instead of stopping Christianity, it makes it EVEN MORE popular. It spreads around the world and now we even count time from the birth of Jesus.
Christians see this as a win, obviously, but look at it from the Jew’s perspective. Now they are not only NOT God’s special boys, they are recast as the VILLAINS. The ones who betrayed the Messiah for a few shekels. The ones who murdered the Messiah. The ones who had their religion superceded.
The Jews lost so hard against Jesus that they started grinding their teeth and rending their clothes and spitting at each other and pointing fingers until they burned their own temple down. Fail on top of fail on top of fail.
Given this, does it not make sense that 1400 years later they wrote their gay little Talmud, where they tried to recast themselves as the special boys again, where they wrote a bunch of nasty fan fiction about Jesus, where they tried to convinced themselves they were the TRUE secret kings and everyone else was just inferior cattle for them to exploit?
To me the story of the Jews is quite sad. It reminds me of Gollum and how the ring of power wrecked his mind.
I’m not even trying to be mean either. I’m actually trying to talk some sense into the good Jews. Let go of the Talmud and the ugliness it represents.
The rule of society is that every single Jew is a 100% perfect individual with superior genetics and the purest of all bloodlines. If you question this premise, you are full of hate and must be censored and debanked. Even when Jewish People rape and kill children, like Leo Frank, everyone must say they are heroes, and give their foundation money.
I started telling friends around 2017 that they didn’t have to like Trump, but that if they posted their derangement against him on social media, it would eventually be a bad look. But I don’t think it was until Jussie blew up in their faces that most of them figured it out. Once Dave Chapelle mocked the story, they knew they’d lost the narrative on it.
After Jussie, I noticed most liberals stopped jumping on FAKE NEWS as quickly as they had been. They wouldn’t admit Trump was right about FAKE NEWS, but they basically acted like they needed to be wary, which is essentially the same thing, whether they are willing to admit it or not.
When Covid was launched, I think they were so desperate to believe in the TV again that many of them jumped on it as a way to be right again. And they really thought they had the moral high ground and The $cience on their side. It took a few years for that one to blow up in their faces, but eventually I think it wore almost all of them down. Almost like a law of diminishing returns thing. Think how hard it must have been for them to keep clinging onto their fear of Covid through 2022, after they’d had it a few times and knew it was a flu, and after watching all the normal people living life normally and being perfectly fine. Talk about demoralizing!