5
supertootsday 5 points ago +7 / -2

If he is controlled opposition, what is the purpose of attacking him with lawfare?

20
supertootsday 20 points ago +27 / -7

The hate on Alex Jones on this site is off the charts. Sad.

2
supertootsday 2 points ago +2 / -0

They wanted more than the GDP of India.

1
supertootsday 1 point ago +1 / -0

Your tone came across as "No harm, no foul, he can just continue on in a new venture".

2
supertootsday 2 points ago +2 / -0

To use an analogy to what you are saying, the police raid my house and absolutely wreck it, illegal warrant and all. But I can just buy a new house right? and be good

2
supertootsday 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes, and he will. The point is the precedent that is being set here. Judge defaulted him guilty before the trial even started. Then they literally said in closing arguments the plan is to shut him down, not for money. They even tried to sue to take his name, and all social media accounts. Everyone needs to be paying attention to this.

9
supertootsday 9 points ago +11 / -2

It is not funny. They changed the rules of the auction at the last minute to secret and unilaterally decided they could sell it to whomever they wanted, no matter the bid. How is that an auction? Love or Hate Jones, if you are going to dance on his grave you are tying your own noose.

1
supertootsday 1 point ago +2 / -1

live now, and he is going to stay until they show up with a court order. The auction was total bullshit too. They changed the rules last minute, secret auction, and they can sell it to whoever they want (not the highest bidder)

4
supertootsday 4 points ago +4 / -0

Young and dumb. In my time, I didn't get my shit together until 28 (47 now). I imagine that has shifted even further and we have perpetual teenagers up to 35 now.

3
supertootsday 3 points ago +3 / -0

It is not a moronic statement. I served 2 tours for both Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom. What I said is true. Does that mean its widespread? Probably not. Is it enough to cause major issues. Yes. Women do not belong in direct combat. They belong in support roles. Period.

9
supertootsday 9 points ago +9 / -0

Women in the military undermine morale, and constantly try to get out of work by batting their eyes and spreading their legs. It introduces an artificial stimulus for men on a team to compete against each other for the female, instead of working cohesively against the enemy. They also get pregnant on purpose so they can leave the deployment. Keep the women in the rear with the gear.

9
supertootsday 9 points ago +9 / -0

Most of them are from 1 year ago right? This is something that really pisses me off about people restreaming political stuff, saying its live. Like older congressional hearings, without putting what the date of the announcement was.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›