"Why are the majority of 'Q' attacks by "PRO_MAGA" supporters coming from AJ [MOS backed] and/or AJ known associates? "
Dr. Steve Pieczenik is establishing Q-like credibility for Alex fucking Jones. In essence, saying, on his fucking show "I used you."
2123
Q's select ANON quote: "I love shills now at this point. Even when this is over some Mossad/Clown asshole will still be typing useless division tactics out of his frayed handbook on to an empty board. Some people just don't know when they have lost…"
2166
"AJ [TEMPLATE] WAS DESIGNED TO ATTACK/CENSOR 'QANON' [primary obj]."
HOW MANY OF YOU ARE STUPID ENOUGH TO FALL FOR THAT WHICH YOU WERE WARNED OF? KISSINGER WAS PURGED FROM THE PENTAGON FOR A REASON.
6:38 (after a $ audiobook plug $), which backs up EVERYTHING I just said.
"Number two, and this is important for you Alex to understand, and all of the listeners..."
"You were the the method through which we were able to implement the coup."
Do you understand what I am saying? Frankly,
7:01 "The truth is you were the vehicle through which I was promoting the necessary actions that had to be accomplished; think of that for a moment, you were the first entity as a banned video you identified 19 years ago when you came forth and I associated with you on 9/11."
Recently got turned on to McKay and been trying to search for his older podcasts but his YouTube channel was terminated and I've been having a hard time finding anything. Any chance you could point me in the right direction?
Yeah, this is why I never trusted the guy. He's friends with all the wrong people. Also he's jewish and he's appeared on AJ's show numerous times so I consider him to be a creature of the Mossad just as Alex is.
AJ is a Mossad shill, period. So were Maxwell and Epstein and bunch of Senators and Congressman including Schumer and Schiff. I don't trust Pieczenik, he's attached to the wrong people.
Ask yourself a (simple) logical question… Why are the majority of 'Q' attacks by "PRO_MAGA" supporters coming from AJ [MOS backed] and/or AJ known associates? Why are we a threat to them? Why not simply publish an original picture +/- 1,2,3 secs to establish credibility? Why was this done in the past? We knew this type of "attack" was coming. PREDICTABLE. FAKE NEWS. ATTACKS WILL ONLY INTENSIFY. Q
As someone with thirty years in the printing industry I can say this - the ballots were marked with what is known as a ghost watermark in the paper. When I saw the sworn affidavits in Michigan talking about ballots that had clear grey watermarks, I knew this was the result of copying ghost watermarks.
To understand this, look at our new currency that has a watermark of the President on the bill in the paper. This is particularly noticeable in the lower right of a one hundred dollar bill. Now scan or copy that bill and watch what happens with that watermark.
I mentioned this on another forum and a gentlemen who was a graphic designer with very high-end scanning equipment didn't believe me. So he scanned a hundred dollar bill. He was then kind enough to comment that he indeed checked what I was saying and he confirmed what I said was true.
Furthermore, there is also a way to lace UV and/or IR microprint into ballot lines. This is done with alternating pattern so, in order to copy it, you would need to know the light distribution pattern that was first established as the security parameter.
Lastly, Pulitzer was right that you can scan paper and determine where it's country of origin is. Paper is basically nothing but pressed wood pulp which means it's composition is primarily going to be that of the natural supply of forests in the nation it originates. Here is a big hint, the wood composition of paper in North America is substantially different from the wood composition of paper from Asia - particularly China. So he is correct here as well.
"Ballots, like money, are printed on special fraud-resistant paper, with particular size, thickness, weight, texture, color, and formats made to exact specifications. Furthermore, the paper is impressed with unique identifiers, such as watermarks, that certify it as an official ballot."
Is he telling the truth or not? I think it is possible, heck, in fact I have been thinking ever since the very first time this Steve guy made this claim on INFOWARS to Owen Shroyer that this scenario is actually possible. Trump new this was coming and no one wondered if there was a way for paper to be tracked?
People are claiming DS fake Trump videos as a possibility, a Q plan devised in secret 3 years in advanced, MIL covert ops on the 6th, etc. But technology to track paper ballots? Nah thats too hard....lol ok
TRUST THE PLAN doesn't mean we know everything going on, Q said that future would prove past and our job is to dig through the dumps of info.
He is there to incriminate this movement as a criminal 'Military Coup' movement. We are not about a "Military Coup" regardless of what the many, many retards here think. Pieczenik is a tall stack of shit.
Watch this Steve Pieczenik's eyes dart back and forth. Do you have the sense to spot a lie? If you have a fucking brain, you can see every time he lies and bends the truth to spin his narrative. Let me remind you all, of how many of you bought into Simon the alien fucker - an idiot - now you're buying into something worse than a grift.
This man is saying that WE, TRUMP'S TEAM, OUR SIDE, is the coup. And that sits well with you all? How many of you are stupid enough to feel that sits right? THE COUP WAS AGAINST US, NOT US AGAINST THEM.
**All of you stupid motherfuckers that never learned how to read body language can be mesmerized by this old prick. I read lies - I make a living that way - if I'm wrong about grifting (I believe I was now), it is purposeful DISINFORMATION. HE IS RINGING A DINNER BELL. An old bullshit cook, bringing in the wolves. He's attached to Kissinger. That's all you need to know to prove this.
He's fueling the fucking narrative that leads to civil war through this motherfucking Alex Jones that Q VERY SPECIFICALLY told us not to trust - regarding him, or anyone around him.
You do fucking get why I take this so seriously, do you not? Does it register, or are you hypnotized? Wake the fuck up.
Ret. Gen. McInerney is probably the most credible person I've heard discussing this stuff.
Homegrown hopium https://rumble.com/vckqvl-jan-8-2021-lt-gen-tom-mcinerney-full-segment.html
I've been sharing it too.
It's mandatory viewing, as far as I'm concerned...
So the pope was arrested a year ago, huh?
M
O
S
S
A
D
Ask yourself one simple question.
Are we the Coup?
Think mainstream narrative.
"YES! ALEX JONES SHOW SAID SO!"
ARE WE THE COUP?
"Dr. Steve Pieczenik said we are!"
WE ARE NOT THE FUCKING COUP. THEY ARE.
RE-READ DROPS RE: "AJ"
2089
"Why are the majority of 'Q' attacks by "PRO_MAGA" supporters coming from AJ [MOS backed] and/or AJ known associates? "
Dr. Steve Pieczenik is establishing Q-like credibility for Alex fucking Jones. In essence, saying, on his fucking show "I used you."
2123
Q's select ANON quote: "I love shills now at this point. Even when this is over some Mossad/Clown asshole will still be typing useless division tactics out of his frayed handbook on to an empty board. Some people just don't know when they have lost…"
2166
"AJ [TEMPLATE] WAS DESIGNED TO ATTACK/CENSOR 'QANON' [primary obj]."
HOW MANY OF YOU ARE STUPID ENOUGH TO FALL FOR THAT WHICH YOU WERE WARNED OF? KISSINGER WAS PURGED FROM THE PENTAGON FOR A REASON.
4:10 "We are now officially in a military coup."
5:15 "We are literally in a military coup."
6:38 (after a $ audiobook plug $), which backs up EVERYTHING I just said.
"Number two, and this is important for you Alex to understand, and all of the listeners..."
"You were the the method through which we were able to implement the coup."
Do you understand what I am saying? Frankly,
7:01 "The truth is you were the vehicle through which I was promoting the necessary actions that had to be accomplished; think of that for a moment, you were the first entity as a banned video you identified 19 years ago when you came forth and I associated with you on 9/11."
you must not listen very well.
Recently got turned on to McKay and been trying to search for his older podcasts but his YouTube channel was terminated and I've been having a hard time finding anything. Any chance you could point me in the right direction?
ThankQ fren
Yeah, this is why I never trusted the guy. He's friends with all the wrong people. Also he's jewish and he's appeared on AJ's show numerous times so I consider him to be a creature of the Mossad just as Alex is.
AJ is a Mossad shill, period. So were Maxwell and Epstein and bunch of Senators and Congressman including Schumer and Schiff. I don't trust Pieczenik, he's attached to the wrong people.
https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1038778638613839872 [0:21] Breitbart article linked [2 days prior] to the article being published? Reconcile. Note the time? [9:41] [100%] Note Apple’s stock image(s)? [9:41] [100%] Reconcile. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mMfCvmykRxg&app=desktop Reconcile. https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1038858004899266564 https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/974008177271410688.html Reconcile. Attempts to deceive AUTISTS/ANONS will FAIL. We are a threat to their livelihood [+CLAS]. Do not let their attempts corrupt GOOD organizations. Think OANN. They want you DIVIDED. Stay STRONG. Stay TOGETHER. https://twitter.com/TuckerCarlson/status/1038898688725270533 “Division keeps them in power.” Q
Get the fuck back in line.
^^^^^DING DING DING DING!!!!
THANK YOU, XGemInaV, for showing that NOT EVERYBODY here is a GOD DAMNED RETARD.
He also said the ballots were marked. He's a bullshit artist.
As someone with thirty years in the printing industry I can say this - the ballots were marked with what is known as a ghost watermark in the paper. When I saw the sworn affidavits in Michigan talking about ballots that had clear grey watermarks, I knew this was the result of copying ghost watermarks.
To understand this, look at our new currency that has a watermark of the President on the bill in the paper. This is particularly noticeable in the lower right of a one hundred dollar bill. Now scan or copy that bill and watch what happens with that watermark.
I mentioned this on another forum and a gentlemen who was a graphic designer with very high-end scanning equipment didn't believe me. So he scanned a hundred dollar bill. He was then kind enough to comment that he indeed checked what I was saying and he confirmed what I said was true.
Furthermore, there is also a way to lace UV and/or IR microprint into ballot lines. This is done with alternating pattern so, in order to copy it, you would need to know the light distribution pattern that was first established as the security parameter.
Lastly, Pulitzer was right that you can scan paper and determine where it's country of origin is. Paper is basically nothing but pressed wood pulp which means it's composition is primarily going to be that of the natural supply of forests in the nation it originates. Here is a big hint, the wood composition of paper in North America is substantially different from the wood composition of paper from Asia - particularly China. So he is correct here as well.
Thanks for that info. This is something less than 1% of people know.
They are marked. Learn moar ballot knowledge.
https://www.law.upenn.edu/live/news/10346-ballots-are-secure-knowledge-on-vote-by-mail-is
"Ballots, like money, are printed on special fraud-resistant paper, with particular size, thickness, weight, texture, color, and formats made to exact specifications. Furthermore, the paper is impressed with unique identifiers, such as watermarks, that certify it as an official ballot."
They may be marked, but the markings did not make any difference in this election.
How do you know? The audits haven't happened -- yet.
Didn't they shred all the fake ballots already?
The marks that Pieceznik claims, are made of non-radioactive isotopes, which would be detectable after shredding, even burning.
That's the same as any law, regulation, or rule: they don't matter if not enforced.
Also, can't election officials just print out more real ballots, since they have complete control over the systems?
there is a mix of mis-information in the mix here. doesn't mean its all bs. you sound like a doomer. we won. case closed.
Do we really know if they weren't at this point?
Is he telling the truth or not? I think it is possible, heck, in fact I have been thinking ever since the very first time this Steve guy made this claim on INFOWARS to Owen Shroyer that this scenario is actually possible. Trump new this was coming and no one wondered if there was a way for paper to be tracked?
People are claiming DS fake Trump videos as a possibility, a Q plan devised in secret 3 years in advanced, MIL covert ops on the 6th, etc. But technology to track paper ballots? Nah thats too hard....lol ok
TRUST THE PLAN doesn't mean we know everything going on, Q said that future would prove past and our job is to dig through the dumps of info.
I've got a lot of reading to do. Would be much better time spent than porn.
This full interview was absolutely fantastic- best thing I've ever seen on infowars (not that I have watched it alot)... thanks for posting!
And he has called firings and resignations before they happened
Steve Pieczenik?
Now I'm doubting. ☹
SMART CHOICE.
It's Alex Jones' show.
He is there to incriminate this movement as a criminal 'Military Coup' movement. We are not about a "Military Coup" regardless of what the many, many retards here think. Pieczenik is a tall stack of shit.
Watch this Steve Pieczenik's eyes dart back and forth. Do you have the sense to spot a lie? If you have a fucking brain, you can see every time he lies and bends the truth to spin his narrative. Let me remind you all, of how many of you bought into Simon the alien fucker - an idiot - now you're buying into something worse than a grift.
This man is saying that WE, TRUMP'S TEAM, OUR SIDE, is the coup. And that sits well with you all? How many of you are stupid enough to feel that sits right? THE COUP WAS AGAINST US, NOT US AGAINST THEM.
**All of you stupid motherfuckers that never learned how to read body language can be mesmerized by this old prick. I read lies - I make a living that way - if I'm wrong about grifting (I believe I was now), it is purposeful DISINFORMATION. HE IS RINGING A DINNER BELL. An old bullshit cook, bringing in the wolves. He's attached to Kissinger. That's all you need to know to prove this.
I know he has legit guests on his show here and there but remember this https://greatawakening.win/p/11S0Nl6JCW/q-post-2102--remember-disinfo-is/c/
Isn’t Steve the guy that talked about QSF Blockchain on the ballots? Lara?
Q said AJ is Mossad.
ANSWER ME INSTEAD OF DOWNVOTING LIKE A LITTLE BITCH, YOU FUCKING COWARD.
He's fueling the fucking narrative that leads to civil war through this motherfucking Alex Jones that Q VERY SPECIFICALLY told us not to trust - regarding him, or anyone around him.
You do fucking get why I take this so seriously, do you not? Does it register, or are you hypnotized? Wake the fuck up.
I was wrong about grifting with how often this motherfucker lied. Thanks for provoking me to dig deeper.
He's much worse than that. Every single instance - I call it right for a reason. You're buying into a disinformation agent who is setting us up.
So I'll ask you one time:
ARE WE THE COUP?
Yes, or no?
https://www.thebalancecareers.com/complete-list-of-army-enlisted-mos-s-3346173
I’ll ask again. Are you guys SURE that MOS is Mossad?
Everyone trying to figure out whether to trust this or not.
Easy. Not Q. Not Trump. No Trust.
Thanks for the link. Gave up hope on Jones after the 6th
No thanks. This is the nut job that said all the ballots were watermarked and they could track every single one of them. How'd that turn out?
You must have missed the part where it was never presented in a court case to prove the fraud.
Edit: I went through all the cases and affidavit's and it was never brought to a court.
he has not lied yet it's hard to watch him on AJs show because most of us Detest Alex who hates Q and any mention of it.
Interesting.