We have everything.
How can we use what we know?
How do you ‘legally’ inject/make public/use as evidence?
What are you witnessing unfold?
Trust the plan.
Q
Does this mean Schumer is secretly a white hat? Because he's a fucking asshole, but he isn't stupid. He HAS to know Trump's lawyers will lay out EVERYTHING for the world to see.
Schumer is the worst of the worst satanic pedophile (((communist))) demons in modern history.
The explanation is EASY:
their arrogance, Hubris, and the fact that they have NEVER faced any consequences nor responsibility for any of their actions.
They have literally done anything and everything they want, committed every serious and disgusting crime imaginable, and NOT ONCE been held to serious account.
Frankly if I could get away with doing anything & everything I wanted maybe I would do it myself too!!
Then this brings me back to my original point. Schumer isn't stupid, so why would he go through a process that allows Trump a chance to defend himself with evidence?
This is a trial and, quite frankly, will have better ratings than the fucking Super bowl. Do you think Trump's lawyers (Giuliani and co.) will allow a one sided circus?
** The explanation is EASY:**
their arrogance, Hubris, and the fact that they have NEVER faced any consequences nor responsibility for any of their actions.They have literally done anything and everything they want, committed every serious and disgusting crime imaginable, and NOT ONCE been held to serious account.
Maybe he doesn’t know what evidence they have? He thinks if they had evidence they would have used it by now? Or maybe he thinks they can just bulldog it into getting the results they want by bribing/blackmailing the judges? Or they are going to create fake evidence again like they did with the Russia Hoax? I know they are already trying to say that Trump was on a call with Putin during the storming of the Capitol lmao.
I tell you what; If The Plan ends up falling thru for any reason whatsoever & we don't see real, concrete, earth-shattering, thermo-Nuclear HABBENINGS within the next 1-2 months........
Schumer? They can have deals, live out life in gitmo instead of death. The only deal they should get is one that maybe spares their life but they should never see family, kids, friends, anyone ever again and be left to suffer the mental anguish That a prison cell would offer. No rec, no outside time. Nothing.
Have we heard who is going to preside over the hearing? Since (corrupt) John Roberts won't be there, I'm guessing one of the Liberal judges. And all 'objections' have to go thru the Judge to the Senate body. IMO, many of the Senators will object and NOT want to hear the remarks from Trump's team. It's VERY possible that evidence will again be suppressed.
I wonder if this is may be a possible reason SCOTUS denied the case? So there wouldn’t be any obstacle in presenting the evidence? I’m not an expert (except in armchairs) but it seems like evidence being presented in an ongoing case is limiting for it to be used elsewhere? Just a thought.
I'm sure they know this. The vast majority of what they have done to Trump in the last 4 years has been unconstitutional, but they don't give a fuck because the MSM covers for their corrupt asses.
The key phrase is "judgment...shall [extend] to removal from Office, AND disqualification [etc.]." The conjunction is "AND," not "OR." This means that the judgment MUST include removal from office. If he is not in office, there can be no "removal.". If there is no removal, there can be no disqualification.
Sorry, to doom, but what would be the point of Trump running again in 2024 if they stole the election this year? Trusting the plan, so thinking it is just fantasy speculation. The logic of another run is not there for me.
Agreed. So it makes no sense for the Dems to try and block him from running.. unless they think they can block him from becoming the president after the military take over?
Guys, don't you see the plan? Joe gets to fuck up the country for a whole term, meanwhile our corrupt military will tell us they must let this happen to open our eyes
I mean that's obviously bullshit as well because they can use dominion, ESPECIALLY in 2024, they'll have that bitch humming and won't nobody know a damn thing, Dominion is going to run our elections going forward. You honestly think they're worried about Trump running in 2024?
This is going to be nothing more than a corpofascist show trial whereby all precedent will be ignored and Trump declared guilty without due process. It's just the beginning of the left's top priority to destroy Trump, bring him and his family to ruin and make an example out of them so that no one ever dares challenge the state again.
That's what I Love about anons discourse. We usually guess the news cycle b4 it happens. This community is like meteorologists except with better accuracy ?
If we're watching a movie, the Dems might have been forced to do all of this. If the NSA has all the goods on every deepstate player, we might have already been watching a movie for the past 3 to 4 years.
The end goal here is not just to arrest the bad guys, it's also about preventing civil war. To prevent civil war the normies have to wake up and they have to be slowly herded towards their awakening, through a step by step narrative that's laid out for them.
This is great. However, I worry about a false flag!
Dear Lord,
Please protect us from evil. Please throttle the plans to do evil. Please Lord God almighty let justice be served to those who wish to do your people harm. In Jesus name, Amen.
This reminds me of Isaack Kappy and Lin Wood accusing high profile people of being pedos, but no one has sued for defamation, because then you can introduce evidence to prove they are. They must be so scared of Trump that they are willing to take a risk on them being able to control what is introduced as evidence.
Did 'Mueller' open the door to Ukraine?
Did 'Mueller' open the door to FISA [illegal]?
How do you introduce evidence legally?
Did 'Impeachment' provide a platform to discuss findings of Ukraine?
How do you introduce evidence legally?
Did 'Impeachment' harm or help POTUS [public]?
How do you introduce [D]s high crimes [corruption] to the public?
Why didn't POTUS remove [Hussein] holdovers from NSC?
Do you really believe that POTUS & team trusted [Hussein] holdovers to remain within the admin and work to enact POTUS' agenda w/o bias or confrontation?
How do you 'awaken' the 'induced coma' public [FAKE NEWS control] from their long sleep?
Sometimes allowing your enemies to [openly] attack…….
Logical thinking.
This won't be a "typical" type of criminal trial. I am hoping POTUS's team will be able to introduce all this evidence during this time. What confuses me is that the "impeachment" gig is for inciting violence and not regarding election fraud. So, not sure how that evidence will be introduced here.
Don’t get to pumped, this is not a court trial, it’s in the senate and make no mistake, they make the rules, they will never let POTUS expose the fraud.
No the impeachment trial will not enter in stuff like that.
You basically get articles about very specific things, and then you can only address those specific things.
They're going to say "he incited insurrection with the speech." What happened in the election is immaterial to the content of the speech and the immediate aftermath. Even if the election was fraudulent - and i dont think it was - you can't insight an unlawful action, and then hide behind the complaint being legitimate.
We have everything. How can we use what we know? How do you ‘legally’ inject/make public/use as evidence? What are you witnessing unfold? Trust the plan. Q
Wow, very fitting. It's Q Post #1181 on 4/19/2018 for anyone wanting to confirm it.
I don’t understand why they get a trial but we never got one for election fraud.
The application of the law when it suits them is infuriating!
Am I wrong to think that Trump shouldn’t have to set foot in a courtroom for this Kangaroo court?
Does this mean Schumer is secretly a white hat? Because he's a fucking asshole, but he isn't stupid. He HAS to know Trump's lawyers will lay out EVERYTHING for the world to see.
Abso-Fucking-lutely NOT.
Schumer is the worst of the worst satanic pedophile (((communist))) demons in modern history.
The explanation is EASY:
their arrogance, Hubris, and the fact that they have NEVER faced any consequences nor responsibility for any of their actions.
They have literally done anything and everything they want, committed every serious and disgusting crime imaginable, and NOT ONCE been held to serious account.
Frankly if I could get away with doing anything & everything I wanted maybe I would do it myself too!!
Then this brings me back to my original point. Schumer isn't stupid, so why would he go through a process that allows Trump a chance to defend himself with evidence?
This is a trial and, quite frankly, will have better ratings than the fucking Super bowl. Do you think Trump's lawyers (Giuliani and co.) will allow a one sided circus?
"These people are stupid" - Q
No offense fren, but you didn’t read my post. ;-)
I’ve been wondering the same thing.
Maybe he doesn’t know what evidence they have? He thinks if they had evidence they would have used it by now? Or maybe he thinks they can just bulldog it into getting the results they want by bribing/blackmailing the judges? Or they are going to create fake evidence again like they did with the Russia Hoax? I know they are already trying to say that Trump was on a call with Putin during the storming of the Capitol lmao.
You are literally being way too fucking kind.
Exactly. Right now they think they successfully stole another election.
Yep.
I tell you what; If The Plan ends up falling thru for any reason whatsoever & we don't see real, concrete, earth-shattering, thermo-Nuclear HABBENINGS within the next 1-2 months........
War.
It’s all we have left to take our country back. Pray that justice prevails.
Amen, brother.
What if he sings for a deal
Schumer? They can have deals, live out life in gitmo instead of death. The only deal they should get is one that maybe spares their life but they should never see family, kids, friends, anyone ever again and be left to suffer the mental anguish That a prison cell would offer. No rec, no outside time. Nothing.
Hopefully.......
Have we heard who is going to preside over the hearing? Since (corrupt) John Roberts won't be there, I'm guessing one of the Liberal judges. And all 'objections' have to go thru the Judge to the Senate body. IMO, many of the Senators will object and NOT want to hear the remarks from Trump's team. It's VERY possible that evidence will again be suppressed.
I wonder if this is may be a possible reason SCOTUS denied the case? So there wouldn’t be any obstacle in presenting the evidence? I’m not an expert (except in armchairs) but it seems like evidence being presented in an ongoing case is limiting for it to be used elsewhere? Just a thought.
Nope, they're just stupid as fuck.
Q doesn't joke when he(they) say "these people are stupid".
I don't think they legit realize the can of worms they're opening up with this impeachment.
They can play it ALL out in the Senate... it will have to be seen by all.
What's the point of the Impeachment if the new "president" has been sworn?
... unless he hasn't been and it was all a theatre?
There is nothing in the Constitution that supports this narrative.
I'm sure they know this. The vast majority of what they have done to Trump in the last 4 years has been unconstitutional, but they don't give a fuck because the MSM covers for their corrupt asses.
Cool. Show me exactly where it says that.
hes out of office retard. you cannot impeach a CIVILIAN.
Where's the part where it says they can to it to someone who is out of office?
And I never downvoted you.
The key phrase is "judgment...shall [extend] to removal from Office, AND disqualification [etc.]." The conjunction is "AND," not "OR." This means that the judgment MUST include removal from office. If he is not in office, there can be no "removal.". If there is no removal, there can be no disqualification.
Sorry, to doom, but what would be the point of Trump running again in 2024 if they stole the election this year? Trusting the plan, so thinking it is just fantasy speculation. The logic of another run is not there for me.
He will be president in 2021. Biden will be out.
Agreed. So it makes no sense for the Dems to try and block him from running.. unless they think they can block him from becoming the president after the military take over?
What the hell is happening...
Guys, don't you see the plan? Joe gets to fuck up the country for a whole term, meanwhile our corrupt military will tell us they must let this happen to open our eyes
It's now or never bby
I mean that's obviously bullshit as well because they can use dominion, ESPECIALLY in 2024, they'll have that bitch humming and won't nobody know a damn thing, Dominion is going to run our elections going forward. You honestly think they're worried about Trump running in 2024?
I don't buy that for a second. No way in hell.
But patriots will certainly carry out a Dominion Boston Tea party before the election to destroy the machines, no?
And by that I mean a well-organized letter campaign!
I got that. They could try to wait and do it once they feel stronger, after a month or two.
Why they rush so much?
Democracy, laws, the will of the people ... nothing has stopped them yet, why should they slow down now
Past the voting machines again right? /s
It’s purely an attack on Trump and a giant “FUCK YOU” to him and us - his supporters.
It’s another of the million ways the left hates, attacks, slanders and defames Trump and us.
IMO; that’s all that this “impeachment” is; exactly like the first one.
These “people” are sick and they need to hang. When will we have had enough????
This is going to be nothing more than a corpofascist show trial whereby all precedent will be ignored and Trump declared guilty without due process. It's just the beginning of the left's top priority to destroy Trump, bring him and his family to ruin and make an example out of them so that no one ever dares challenge the state again.
Exactly this.
This is just going to have to turn to war.
Then the people will see this and turn on the Dems. Optics!
No they wont.
Ha! Wow, I made a post about this very habbenings this morning before this announcement
I 'member. Great post!
Lol talk about limited foresight ?
That's what I Love about anons discourse. We usually guess the news cycle b4 it happens. This community is like meteorologists except with better accuracy ?
Why would the Dems give Trump a chance to defend himself?
If we're watching a movie, the Dems might have been forced to do all of this. If the NSA has all the goods on every deepstate player, we might have already been watching a movie for the past 3 to 4 years.
The end goal here is not just to arrest the bad guys, it's also about preventing civil war. To prevent civil war the normies have to wake up and they have to be slowly herded towards their awakening, through a step by step narrative that's laid out for them.
This is great. However, I worry about a false flag!
Dear Lord,
Please protect us from evil. Please throttle the plans to do evil. Please Lord God almighty let justice be served to those who wish to do your people harm. In Jesus name, Amen.
This reminds me of Isaack Kappy and Lin Wood accusing high profile people of being pedos, but no one has sued for defamation, because then you can introduce evidence to prove they are. They must be so scared of Trump that they are willing to take a risk on them being able to control what is introduced as evidence.
Q3850 Feb 10 2020
Did 'Mueller' open the door to Ukraine? Did 'Mueller' open the door to FISA [illegal]? How do you introduce evidence legally? Did 'Impeachment' provide a platform to discuss findings of Ukraine? How do you introduce evidence legally? Did 'Impeachment' harm or help POTUS [public]? How do you introduce [D]s high crimes [corruption] to the public? Why didn't POTUS remove [Hussein] holdovers from NSC? Do you really believe that POTUS & team trusted [Hussein] holdovers to remain within the admin and work to enact POTUS' agenda w/o bias or confrontation? How do you 'awaken' the 'induced coma' public [FAKE NEWS control] from their long sleep? Sometimes allowing your enemies to [openly] attack……. Logical thinking.
https://media.gab.com/system/media_attachments/files/062/958/141/original/166e15b38003a9f0.jpeg
I think that is the plan.
Uhhh..... you serious Clark?????
HOLY KEK THIS IS YUUUUUGGGGEEEE!!!!!!
And what impact will this have???
This won't be a "typical" type of criminal trial. I am hoping POTUS's team will be able to introduce all this evidence during this time. What confuses me is that the "impeachment" gig is for inciting violence and not regarding election fraud. So, not sure how that evidence will be introduced here.
Don’t get to pumped, this is not a court trial, it’s in the senate and make no mistake, they make the rules, they will never let POTUS expose the fraud.
sounds like deflection and distraction to me.....
No the impeachment trial will not enter in stuff like that.
You basically get articles about very specific things, and then you can only address those specific things.
They're going to say "he incited insurrection with the speech." What happened in the election is immaterial to the content of the speech and the immediate aftermath. Even if the election was fraudulent - and i dont think it was - you can't insight an unlawful action, and then hide behind the complaint being legitimate.
that's not how impeachment proceedings work, is what i'm telling you.
Yeah it's getting time to make them wake up. I'm done
Who says that an Impeachment Trial held by a majority Dem congress (along with Uniparty R's), will allow Trump to reveal anything?
You saw what they did before - they cut speaking time in half, talked over people, refused to listen.
Which TV network will air the evidence?
Really just sounds like hot air talk again from Rudy and Co.
lol i floated this yesterday and got called dumb..
Here comes the gander!
Sounds like another Bre'r ? moment the Dems and Turncoat GOP stepped in.
It’s crazy. Reddit is infested with those same tin foil head nuts saying the evidence doesn’t exist