Rand Paul is controlled opposition. Not only did he NOT VOTE to object to ANY STATES... he was also very anti-Trump before Trump became so powerful that he could no longer sustain a career in the republican party without sucking up to him.
Wrong. Rand Paul is a strict constitutionalist and the most "FOR the PEOPLE" person we have in politics today. He was reading a stupid script for a comedy show pretending to be a media correspondent. You're going to slap him with the "controlled op" label over this nonsense, an interview with a vapid host, while he was actively running AGAINST Trump? Before him and Trump were able to really talk to each other?
Look at all of the meetings Trump and Rand had after Trump won the presidency. Think of all the terrible things Trump said about Rand...oh there really wasn't anyhing of substance was there? I think Trump made fun of Rand's looks. And that was it. Why is that? Because Trump knew who Rand was. Rand may not have known who Trump really was at that time, but Trump knew who Rand was. A patriot. Trump and Rand are basically on the same side, here. They are FOR the people. and against the corruption in government. Rand has MORE than proven himself over the years.
That's an absolutely valid concern and I'm glad that he brought that thought up in people's minds. Was he wrong about Trump in regards to that? Yes. But he was not wrong in bringing up the topic. In the end, Rand and Trump collaborated on many things and got some very good things passed. Rand is a solid patriot.
It's completely constitutional to object to the electoral college. Being a 'strict constitutionalist' isn't an excuse for turning a blind eye to the most corrupt election in history.
Days after President Joe Biden took office and the Democrats took control of the U.S. Senate, Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., would not unequivocally say Sunday that the 2020 presidential election was not stolen and called for an investigation of fraud, without providing evidence. "The debate over whether or not there was fraud should occur, we never had any presentation in court where we actually looked at the evidence. Most of the cases were thrown out for lack of standing,** which is a procedural way of not actually hearing the question," Paul said on ABC's "This Week."
While Paul was one of the many Republican politicians who repeated Trump's unfounded allegations of voter fraud, the Kentucky senator did not object to the certification of the Electoral College on Jan. 7 and has said previously that he thinks Congress should not overturn results. "Now, let me say to be clear, I voted to certify the state electors because I think it would be wrong for Congress to overturn that," he said.
Rand is principled and many people hate that about him, because they would rather someone go AGAINST what they believe is the correct interpretation of the law, in order to get a desired result for THEIR side. Rand sticks to what he believes and doesn't bend it or turn his back on it just to give his side a win. That's called integrity. He has said repeatedly that he does not believe it is the role of congress to overturn a state's electoral collage votes. He didn't just conveniently start believing that this year. That's always been his stance.
t's not over. Blaming the good people on our side and attacking them is not the way you "win." However, it is definitely the way the other side wins.
Rand has been one of the most vocal people out there about the integrity of our elections.
Rand Paul endorsed Mitt Romney in 2012 over his own father Ron Paul.
I tried to give him another chance but nope, he flipped on Trump too and put his stamp of approval on the Election Fraud.
Those two things show us that Rand Paul is a coward. I do not really believe that he has principles. I just think he is good at rationalizing his own bullshit. He’s probably being blackmailed.
Rand did not do that (2012) without his father's ok. It was a gamble, and he knew a lot of Ron Paul folks would go against him for doing it. But don't think for a minute that he did it WITHOUT Ron's approval. Ron did not get the nomination, we all know all of the crap that happened to him in 2008 and 2012 and how the media blacked him out and made him out to be a "wacko". You're absolutely entitled to your opinion and I completely understand and respect it. I know a lot of other RP people who still hold that against Rand to this day. I don't. Rand has done a lot of good for our country and he's one of our best fighters. He didn't turn his back on Trump. Not at all. He's one of his biggest allies. We can just agree to disagree on this stuff.
I appreciate your moderate response, since I was getting a little heated. It was just disappointing to hear his speech on the 6th when he certified the fraud. My instinct is that he is not necessarily a terrible person, but it also seems like he consistently bends the knee at these crucial moments. I understand strategically why he endorsed Romney, but his father was still in the race and I just don’t think anyone would have held it against him had he stood by his dad. It might have only been symbolic, but there is still something important about that in my opinion.
I just don’t think anyone would have held it against him had he stood by his dad.
I know, I go back and forth on that, myself. Do you remember anything about Romney at the time doing some sort of underhanded stuff about his dad, I distinctly remember the rumor going around that Rand was forced to back Romney or Romney would do something to try to destroy his father. It may have just been a rumor, (and I'm talking real sleazy stuff, because we both know Ron Paul is clean as a whistle. It would have been all lies. I've always had this weird feeling that it was more than just Rand trying to "get ahead" or kowtowing to the GOP, etc. I don't know, that thought has always stuck in my mind.) Anyway, I also go back and forth a bit on what he did on the 6th, to be honest. There are not many people that I trust, and I honestly do trust Rand. I guess we'll see how things play out. Peace. and thanks for the convo.
He campaigned against Trump and Trump mopped the floor with him and Rand took it personal. Rand has always been pure libertarian to a fault. His reason for not objecting was that its the legislature's job.
He has always been consisting in his voting and calling out congress and their spending yearly.
It looks like it's time to play the aggrieved do-gooders again. Why didn't Rand whine when the GOP were stabbing Trump in the back? At this point I have zero faith in any of these people. It'd be nice to see a handful prove me wrong. I'm sick of hearing from these b.s.ers.
So, if the captured WH is real, how is it they are acting like they’re really in power. Kinda confused, but this is really entertaining to say the least
Outside the evil shitbags running things, regular people that don't take responsibility for themselves or their own actions require an antagonist to direct their hate and blame towards. Without their primary antagonist, they will pick another, and another, and another. It's a mental illness but that's not new to anyone here.
I will NEVER vote Republican Party again... unless there is a complete purging of the party to get rid of RINOs and those who remained silent and consented to the election theft on January 6th.
If those people are still in power... then I won't support the corrupt party. Republicans colluded with Democrats in the election fraud. BOTH parties were up to their elbows in the vote stealing.
It was clear to me when they turned their logo stars upside down.
I voted R for the first time in 2016 in order to vote against John Podesta, and voted R again in 2020 because of Trump. But I'm staying Independent.
That's what I'm having a problem with... last four years were emotional, exciting and hopeful for me. If I was an airplane, it's like I flew into the side of a mountain. The letdown is almost unbearable, and my gloating wife has... you haven't seen a hopeless case of TDS yet. I have never seen such hatred.
Of course I'm a NATZEE, racist, misogynist and I belong in a mental hospital, that's a foregone conclusion. ? Yes, she really screamed it at me-right out of the Soviet manual.
Here: https://psychology.wikia.org/wiki/Political_abuse_of_psychiatry_in_the_Soviet_Union
She might be right on the misogynist part. All the dem psychopaths now are women and her hatred is just about finishing the job.
I'm "keeping the ship in the air," but I can't get any climb power. It's tough.
I have seen a lot of families get jacked up because of the political climate over the past four years. A female client of mine woke up around March of this year, and it has utterly destroyed her whole relationship with her family.
Long time Democrat, but has seen through all of the anti-American, anti-individual rhetoric that the establishment has taken on. But her children - even though they had gone to a wealthy private school - have been fully indoctrinated to be full on communists. The husband is a dog of the media, as well.
It is utterly heartbreaking to hear. But this is why marriage is not one that is necessarily built from 'love' as a feeling. Sexual attraction and personal compatibilities do not account for much when a philosophical world view is heavily challenged when the couple never really resolved what that world view ever really was to begin with.
And even if they did, there are many aspects that people are just learning about how they view an individual to a nation. But all of this was well understood by the ancients through the lens of masculinity and femininity.
I still point to that as being the beginning of the unravelling of our civilization. We let masculinity become weak, and femininity is doing what it does best in eroding and destroying civilization once it gets into power.
And that is entirely our fault. Like the saying goes - it is always the man's fault.
That's what I'm having a problem with... last four years were emotional, exciting and hopeful for me. If I was an airplane, it's like I flew into the side of a mountain. The letdown is almost unbearable, and my gloating wife has... you haven't seen a hopeless case of TDS yet. I have never seen such hatred.
I am in the same situation in reverse as you can see. Thank God almighty that I had the vasectomy. ?
Of course I'm a NATZEE, racist, misogynist and I belong in a mental hospital, that's a foregone conclusion. ? Yes, she really screamed it at me-right out of the Soviet manual.
Well, men and women are different. And, definitionally, it is because women are inherently feminine, whereas men are demanded to be masculine (and that is not to say men are inherently masculine. Inheritance, as a concept, is feminine in nature).
Men have to become masculine. If that doesn't happen, they are at a distinct disadvantage when up against women in the long run.
What you are experiencing is what happens when we weaken masculinity. And that starts with, first, fraternities. The "old boys clubs" existed for a reason (and was also attacked for a reason - both justified in their happenings).
The next was a direct attack on our higher reasoning - our definitions, our higher institutions of learning, our governments.
They do this so that they can control our base masculine virtues - which is our ability to create, and our ability to produce.
They can't eliminate masculinity in its entirety - otherwise, who is around to pay the bills? The reality is women don't need to understand this - they know it, inherently (as they are feminine).
Problem is...most men enter into marriages having zero undestanding of any of this -and it leads to marriages like yours.
But the best thing is, as a man, you can always take control of yourself. You can always cut out that which bothers you. You can always begin to develop your relationship with God (which is the basis of your higher rationalization).
And the from that, you can find like minded men that you can develop relationships with, and regain your fraternity.
Being born a man means discovering and walking this path. The universe demands it - and the women in our lives push us in this manner.
And the way they do it is rarely pleasurable.
That's why wives, in particular, were always lamented. Because after all - you can't live with them, you can't live without them.
And that's just true.
Develop the faith, brother. Find your friends. Put your relationship with God as the priority. Everything else will begin to shape up.
Rand why didn’t you do anything about the voter fraud? Too late to shut the door when the horses are out if the barn.
Establishment GOP loves to let people shit in their house and then complain about the smell.
Rand why did you call people terrorists for being disillusioned and stepping into a place that the people pay for?
We know it was AntiFA initiating it, yet they also had every right.
Rand Paul is controlled opposition. Not only did he NOT VOTE to object to ANY STATES... he was also very anti-Trump before Trump became so powerful that he could no longer sustain a career in the republican party without sucking up to him.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1CAy5cR_Dds
Wrong. Rand Paul is a strict constitutionalist and the most "FOR the PEOPLE" person we have in politics today. He was reading a stupid script for a comedy show pretending to be a media correspondent. You're going to slap him with the "controlled op" label over this nonsense, an interview with a vapid host, while he was actively running AGAINST Trump? Before him and Trump were able to really talk to each other?
Look at all of the meetings Trump and Rand had after Trump won the presidency. Think of all the terrible things Trump said about Rand...oh there really wasn't anyhing of substance was there? I think Trump made fun of Rand's looks. And that was it. Why is that? Because Trump knew who Rand was. Rand may not have known who Trump really was at that time, but Trump knew who Rand was. A patriot. Trump and Rand are basically on the same side, here. They are FOR the people. and against the corruption in government. Rand has MORE than proven himself over the years.
Listen to what he said here at this point in the interview: https://youtu.be/1CAy5cR_Dds?t=204
That's an absolutely valid concern and I'm glad that he brought that thought up in people's minds. Was he wrong about Trump in regards to that? Yes. But he was not wrong in bringing up the topic. In the end, Rand and Trump collaborated on many things and got some very good things passed. Rand is a solid patriot.
It's completely constitutional to object to the electoral college. Being a 'strict constitutionalist' isn't an excuse for turning a blind eye to the most corrupt election in history.
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/sen-rand-paul-continues-making-false-claims-2020/story?id=75446712
Rand is principled and many people hate that about him, because they would rather someone go AGAINST what they believe is the correct interpretation of the law, in order to get a desired result for THEIR side. Rand sticks to what he believes and doesn't bend it or turn his back on it just to give his side a win. That's called integrity. He has said repeatedly that he does not believe it is the role of congress to overturn a state's electoral collage votes. He didn't just conveniently start believing that this year. That's always been his stance.
t's not over. Blaming the good people on our side and attacking them is not the way you "win." However, it is definitely the way the other side wins.
Rand has been one of the most vocal people out there about the integrity of our elections.
Rand Paul endorsed Mitt Romney in 2012 over his own father Ron Paul.
I tried to give him another chance but nope, he flipped on Trump too and put his stamp of approval on the Election Fraud.
Those two things show us that Rand Paul is a coward. I do not really believe that he has principles. I just think he is good at rationalizing his own bullshit. He’s probably being blackmailed.
Rand did not do that (2012) without his father's ok. It was a gamble, and he knew a lot of Ron Paul folks would go against him for doing it. But don't think for a minute that he did it WITHOUT Ron's approval. Ron did not get the nomination, we all know all of the crap that happened to him in 2008 and 2012 and how the media blacked him out and made him out to be a "wacko". You're absolutely entitled to your opinion and I completely understand and respect it. I know a lot of other RP people who still hold that against Rand to this day. I don't. Rand has done a lot of good for our country and he's one of our best fighters. He didn't turn his back on Trump. Not at all. He's one of his biggest allies. We can just agree to disagree on this stuff.
I appreciate your moderate response, since I was getting a little heated. It was just disappointing to hear his speech on the 6th when he certified the fraud. My instinct is that he is not necessarily a terrible person, but it also seems like he consistently bends the knee at these crucial moments. I understand strategically why he endorsed Romney, but his father was still in the race and I just don’t think anyone would have held it against him had he stood by his dad. It might have only been symbolic, but there is still something important about that in my opinion.
I totally get what you're saying and this:
I know, I go back and forth on that, myself. Do you remember anything about Romney at the time doing some sort of underhanded stuff about his dad, I distinctly remember the rumor going around that Rand was forced to back Romney or Romney would do something to try to destroy his father. It may have just been a rumor, (and I'm talking real sleazy stuff, because we both know Ron Paul is clean as a whistle. It would have been all lies. I've always had this weird feeling that it was more than just Rand trying to "get ahead" or kowtowing to the GOP, etc. I don't know, that thought has always stuck in my mind.) Anyway, I also go back and forth a bit on what he did on the 6th, to be honest. There are not many people that I trust, and I honestly do trust Rand. I guess we'll see how things play out. Peace. and thanks for the convo.
It was for the people to call our side terrorists?
Fuck off with that
He campaigned against Trump and Trump mopped the floor with him and Rand took it personal. Rand has always been pure libertarian to a fault. His reason for not objecting was that its the legislature's job.
He has always been consisting in his voting and calling out congress and their spending yearly.
And they are losing to Trump. They know there's some kind of way DJT will strike them.
DING! Popcorn's done.
Rand Paul voted for Biden. He's a disgrace and controlled opposition.
He voted for that shitbag?! I didn't know that. Fuckim.
Rand Paul can go fuck himself why are you linking to him? He is another traitor. Thank god for Jan 6.
It looks like it's time to play the aggrieved do-gooders again. Why didn't Rand whine when the GOP were stabbing Trump in the back? At this point I have zero faith in any of these people. It'd be nice to see a handful prove me wrong. I'm sick of hearing from these b.s.ers.
They are Satanists. Satanists need to hate. That is their normal mode of being. Hatred, envy and fear.
So, if the captured WH is real, how is it they are acting like they’re really in power. Kinda confused, but this is really entertaining to say the least
Outside the evil shitbags running things, regular people that don't take responsibility for themselves or their own actions require an antagonist to direct their hate and blame towards. Without their primary antagonist, they will pick another, and another, and another. It's a mental illness but that's not new to anyone here.
I will NEVER vote Republican Party again... unless there is a complete purging of the party to get rid of RINOs and those who remained silent and consented to the election theft on January 6th.
If those people are still in power... then I won't support the corrupt party. Republicans colluded with Democrats in the election fraud. BOTH parties were up to their elbows in the vote stealing.
It was clear to me when they turned their logo stars upside down.
I voted R for the first time in 2016 in order to vote against John Podesta, and voted R again in 2020 because of Trump. But I'm staying Independent.
well there you go - that's martial arts right there....
step aside and let your opponents moment destroy them....
Without Trump they are all gonna turn on each other... AOC already imploded.
Rent free.
They fear exposure as Satan's helpers
Probably because they sided with Satan, and they would have gotten fully away with killing 95% of the world had he not showed up.
But hey, they are back in the drivers seat. We are well back on our way to eliminating humanity. So.
It was a cool four years.
That's what I'm having a problem with... last four years were emotional, exciting and hopeful for me. If I was an airplane, it's like I flew into the side of a mountain. The letdown is almost unbearable, and my gloating wife has... you haven't seen a hopeless case of TDS yet. I have never seen such hatred. Of course I'm a NATZEE, racist, misogynist and I belong in a mental hospital, that's a foregone conclusion. ? Yes, she really screamed it at me-right out of the Soviet manual. Here: https://psychology.wikia.org/wiki/Political_abuse_of_psychiatry_in_the_Soviet_Union She might be right on the misogynist part. All the dem psychopaths now are women and her hatred is just about finishing the job. I'm "keeping the ship in the air," but I can't get any climb power. It's tough.
Thanks for letting me vent ?
I have seen a lot of families get jacked up because of the political climate over the past four years. A female client of mine woke up around March of this year, and it has utterly destroyed her whole relationship with her family.
Long time Democrat, but has seen through all of the anti-American, anti-individual rhetoric that the establishment has taken on. But her children - even though they had gone to a wealthy private school - have been fully indoctrinated to be full on communists. The husband is a dog of the media, as well.
It is utterly heartbreaking to hear. But this is why marriage is not one that is necessarily built from 'love' as a feeling. Sexual attraction and personal compatibilities do not account for much when a philosophical world view is heavily challenged when the couple never really resolved what that world view ever really was to begin with.
And even if they did, there are many aspects that people are just learning about how they view an individual to a nation. But all of this was well understood by the ancients through the lens of masculinity and femininity.
I still point to that as being the beginning of the unravelling of our civilization. We let masculinity become weak, and femininity is doing what it does best in eroding and destroying civilization once it gets into power.
And that is entirely our fault. Like the saying goes - it is always the man's fault.
It honestly is.
That's what I'm having a problem with... last four years were emotional, exciting and hopeful for me. If I was an airplane, it's like I flew into the side of a mountain. The letdown is almost unbearable, and my gloating wife has... you haven't seen a hopeless case of TDS yet. I have never seen such hatred.
I am in the same situation in reverse as you can see. Thank God almighty that I had the vasectomy. ?
Of course I'm a NATZEE, racist, misogynist and I belong in a mental hospital, that's a foregone conclusion. ? Yes, she really screamed it at me-right out of the Soviet manual.
Here: https://psychology.wikia.org/wiki/Political_abuse_of_psychiatry_in_the_Soviet_Union
She might be right on the misogynist part. All the dem psychopaths now are women and her hatred is just about finishing the job.
I'm "keeping the ship in the air," but I can't get any climb power. It's tough.
Thanks for letting me vent!
Well, men and women are different. And, definitionally, it is because women are inherently feminine, whereas men are demanded to be masculine (and that is not to say men are inherently masculine. Inheritance, as a concept, is feminine in nature).
Men have to become masculine. If that doesn't happen, they are at a distinct disadvantage when up against women in the long run.
What you are experiencing is what happens when we weaken masculinity. And that starts with, first, fraternities. The "old boys clubs" existed for a reason (and was also attacked for a reason - both justified in their happenings).
The next was a direct attack on our higher reasoning - our definitions, our higher institutions of learning, our governments.
They do this so that they can control our base masculine virtues - which is our ability to create, and our ability to produce.
They can't eliminate masculinity in its entirety - otherwise, who is around to pay the bills? The reality is women don't need to understand this - they know it, inherently (as they are feminine).
Problem is...most men enter into marriages having zero undestanding of any of this -and it leads to marriages like yours.
But the best thing is, as a man, you can always take control of yourself. You can always cut out that which bothers you. You can always begin to develop your relationship with God (which is the basis of your higher rationalization).
And the from that, you can find like minded men that you can develop relationships with, and regain your fraternity.
Being born a man means discovering and walking this path. The universe demands it - and the women in our lives push us in this manner.
And the way they do it is rarely pleasurable.
That's why wives, in particular, were always lamented. Because after all - you can't live with them, you can't live without them.
And that's just true.
Develop the faith, brother. Find your friends. Put your relationship with God as the priority. Everything else will begin to shape up.
Nice post-thank you for this ??
Demons were afraid of Jesus too.
They got their man in what’s the deal hahaha
Nothing "almost" about it.
you don't say ... no ability to exist :]
Truth.