Oh well...
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (77)
sorted by:
They had TWO chances...BEFORE and AFTER the Election...Let it Rain and STORM!
Thanks B.A. I was HOPING that was the case!!
I Agree...The Natives ARE NOT gonna stand for much more...Gettin Restless!!
I don't believe this... The military/Q/Trump prohibiting SCOTUS from hearing cases so they can pull out the military will never be accepted by the public.
"We tried all legal avenues!"
"No you didn't, you rigged it so you had to use the military."
Don't you see? There's no way that would stand.
It’s possible Kav and ACB had threats on the lives of their family members to force them to make this decision.
Don't care. Go to someone who will protect you, like Trump.
Don't be a bitch in such an influential position.
Yes, easier to say than do, but you are what is essentially the highest legal authority in the country. If death threats are enough to sway you then you aren't fit.
Could not agree more, they knew what they were signing up for. Compromised. But likely offered stupid amount of money instead.
Edit:funny how btc is 65% owned in china and values are through the roof for money laundering right about now.
I'll admit that even after months of following this I'm still not that skilled at it, I did think the same. I would have been...shall I say...disappointed if they had taken it. This is exactly what I was expecting.
Agree.
I'm not buttering you up, but your comments make the most sense from a logical standpoint. It's like saying that the election fraud would have to be proven AFTER Trump won. Technically he did win but in the context as it stands now, it would be hard to justify fraud investigations by the person who was the beneficiary AND the accuser.
We were told numerous times that the Military was the way. Look at Myanmar. I'm still praying that Myanmar is a soft-launch of the Military action that we were promised, but with less people getting killed (hopefully). Myanmar has it's own troubled history with military intervention, but at least they seem to be going after the right people.
What is 11.3 referring to?
It refers to a passage in a law book or military rules book I believe. It deals with things like treason and when the military can step in I believe. Someone on this board should be able to provide you with a better answer than this :)
Watch from 26:55:
https://rumble.com/vd1dpf-ep.-2382b-the-shot-heard-around-the-world-d5-11.3-end-of-occupation.html
11.3 has to do with the Department of Defense Law of War manual.
Fukushima (March 11th)?
It's not a date
Section 11 starts on page 735 of the document (the pdf reader says page 762): https://dod.defense.gov/Portals/1/Documents/law_war_manual15.pdf
Watch from 26:55
https://rumble.com/vd1dpf-ep.-2382b-the-shot-heard-around-the-world-d5-11.3-end-of-occupation.html
It's from the Department of Defense Law of War manual.
That fucking cunt raped me in high school.
wtf
Ok from a logical standpoint. Knowing where she stands sits at absolute zero. On one hand she is from Louisiana which runs rampant with corruption. On the other hand she hasn't been in SCOTUS that long so she may not be bought off yet and may be part of the plan. Q never mentioned her to my knowledge so idk what to make of her yet.. traitors need to hang and the patriots need to be celebrated. Take that as you will
you only make it that high up if you are controllable and compromised BEFORE you get anywhere near there for consideration.
Fair point
I guess she did get her Haitian baby's from Epstein.
She is a open borders RINO the Haitian kids were the tell
The turtle gave TRUMP the list for the SC nominees.
Amy you are such a disappointment to all who had such high hopes for you!!
Say if things go according to plan and the military takes over and restore the Republic with these judges step down for treason?
The civilian government is corrupt because the people and the culture are corrupt (abortion, porn, fornication, atheism, communism etc.). Without a religious revival and a return to God, there is no restoring the Republic. Augustus considered restoring the Republic but decided against it. The people were too corrupt and disordered and, quite frankly, did not deserve a Republic.
Yeah let's not pretend the people in this board aren't consuming porn - of every kind - a couple times a week at the least.
This holier-than-thou virtue signaling isn't needed nor welcomed.
All legal options had to be exhausted. ??
Feckless
C_A = Catholics In Action
or I suppose Catholics' Inaction kek
Either way, I knew they were going to stab that knife in our backs. Besides abortion, Catholics are liberal.
Great meme!
I hate to contradict Q but there is another way. We The People can and will handle these lunatics. I guess it will be a lot more messy though so he's sort of correct. However, time is running out. Tik Tok Q... Tik Tok... You better do something soon or its going to do itself whether any of us want it or not.
I'm really curious, who is that and what was she suppose to be holding before the Photoshop?
Ah thank you. I was wondering what that was aboutm
Divided we fall.
I am sort of split on this. Because partly why no one is held accountable is because the country is so big. How many will travel 3,000 miles to protest. Most states could be their own country. Then when politicians fuck up you can drive an hour and a half to the capitol to raise some hell.
But at the same time, the US is the last beacon of freedom on the planet. Its military power has kept the wolves at bay. If we break that up, then we give them several small pieces that they can attack separately.And even use some small pieces to attack the others. Imagine land locked states being refused use of sea ports. It could go very badly and be much easier to corrupt and ruin.
Im hoping that russia/putin being vocal about this stuff lately is a sign that shit is getting done behind the scenes.
The cancer that is the left is making the whole country weak. Cut it off. Let them shrivel up without the support from the right.
This isn't Left vs Right, This is Good vs Evil.
We’re already supposed to be 50 parts tethered by the Constitution which was written to restrict the power of the Federal government. Sadly our state legislatures and state executive branches don’t exercise their constitutional authority to limit federal overreach. Yes they can be rejected by SCOTUS, but a 10th amendment case is a lot Dothan an election case. Plus just the act of states bombarding the federal government with legal challenges slows implementation of federal policies.
While I understand your sentiments, we have to curate our image and avoid overly violent content.
Legally, yes it should.
Why
Nevermind, I just got on this morning to find the news about it, she can fuck off too
I said this from day one. Anyone with that many children can be too easily controlled.
No standing before the election, technical errors during the fraud, and moot after the fraudulent certification.
If she's not a part of some plot to catch the corrupt cabal in action she deserves to hang for breaking her oath and committing treason.
Yeah, that's the answer I was looking for this morning, thanks