First, as long as DS thinks they are in control, they will make sure a legit piece will never come out.
Second, if any declas is somehow released before the hammer drops, the rest of the DS will be able to spin it negatively and smear the whole declas, making it polluted when the actual Hammer drops.
The problem I have with option #3 is that it's HBO. There is no way IN HELL HBO will be even remotely fair. There is a better of Rachael Maddow tongue kissing Donald Trump on live TV than there is of a major production company being fair about Q.
There is a better of Rachael Maddow tongue kissing Donald Trump
Atleast with this MSNBC can regain some of their lost ratings !
But yeah, from what I hear it started off as a standalone docu, but even he was surprised that HBO bought it. I think good old naive Ron is being made a fool of.
Yeah, I think people need to have solid contracts drawn up by experienced lawyers, before taking part in any media pieces of any kind, no matter how its characterised. Only a very naive person would go and do interviews with no control over how that info is presented. Ron should really know better, and hence I am thinking he got it all covered.
HBO have started doing some weird documentaries recently; lower quality that previously. They've always been biased, but at least, high production values and some substance. But 'The Vow' really pissed me off as being way too drawn out and soft-hitting (especially after Starz did the much better 'Seduced'). Anyway, we'll see pretty soon!
Yes he, Fred and his father gave the interview with HBO volunteerly. Should be interesting since they also have footage from the first cracked Q password ,matlock,.
I don’t know maybe he grew up in the 80s. Interesting is that after the first crack he changed it to M@dlock! and it got cracked too. So matlock must be from interet from Q but it’s not meant to get out to us.
I think they probably conned him into thinking it would be an objective piece and he would be able toshed light on it but I don't know how anyone who is not brain damaged would think they would do anything other than chop up the footage and make his sound stupid or misrepresent what he says so I have to think he is brain damaged or he sold out.
Ron is the son of a co-founder of 8Chan, the site Q moved to after 4Chan. He's a mod and assisted the move.
There's an HBO documentary about to premiere which accuses him of being Q (maybe?) All of the articles misquote the other founder of 8chan in the same way to make it sound as if he directly accused Ron, while all he said was that Ron and his dad have to know who Q is:
I never got an answer for how we know the transition from 4chan to 8kun was legit. It's not like tripcodes are multi-site wide. Is it just anons taking CM's word at face value?
This. Q never meant there wouldn't be other comms as obviously POTUS was communicating by Tweeting for a while. Q gave examples of what they meant. Those claiming to be Q or know who they are and are in communication with Q should be dismissed. Q meant they would not communicate privately or publicly AS Q team outside of the 8chan/8kun board. Q post 523 https://qagg.news/?q=%23%23513
That's not how cognitive dissonance works I'm afraid. They'll be backing up the truck and loading up on more TDS regardless of whether Q is a larp or not.
Everything I've seen from Ron is that he's a showboat attention whore. Promises "bombshell" after bombshell with no receipts. I'm late to the Q show and know he's from 8kun, but after the way he acted after the election I wouldn't trust him for anything in the world. He's in it for the fame.
He also spread massive lies about Parler and helped sink that ship. Told people they require SSNs to register, etc. Total loser who happens to be lucky enough that Q posted on his website
Anything on HBO is a hit piece and not worth your time. They're an enemy platform.
End of story.
Whether or not that codemonkey dude is in on it, who's to say. I've never had fuzzy feelings about him. Shrug
Sounds like controlled opposition or a hit piece to me. Even if this Cullen guy was trying to make this a fair documentary, HBO has editorial power and will do whatever they want with it.
I highly doubt that Ron was part of any of the plan other than offering a platform for Q to communicate. That won't stop HBO from trying to associate him with it, allow him to get into the spotlight, then use his past to tear him down and bring Q down by association.
If Ron is saying the planned failed it's likely for one of two reasons, he is part of the disinformation version of the plan (mass arrests on Jan 20th) knowingly/unknowingly or he saying that to take the heat off himself regardless of if it's true.
Either way this will likely prove to be a bad move, especially if Ron's past is as checkered as we've hearing.
Look at Jeff Yates nitter if you have it. Says he saw whole series and it's left for interpretation who "Q" is at the end of the film. Not sure if he's legit but should be interesting at he very least.
`We gave it our all, now we need to keep our chins up and go back to our lives as best we are able... We have a new president sworn in and it is our responsibility to respect the Constitution'
Jim and Ron might have painted themselves as American patriots, but that was while Jim lived in the Philippines and Ron in Japan.
Not really, the way Q was established in the first place could have been repeated, and would have been trivial. Anons would have been looking for Q if there was no reappearance.
I'm more interested in knowing how Ron is busy taking photos inside airforce 1, inside the oval office, of POTUS desk, while POTUS is on the move around the world etc while he is ostensibly living and working in the Philippines. But I guess if they were thinkers in the media, there wouldn't be nonsensical stories like this.
I wonder if Ron volunteered for this.
I see three possibilities:
Ron thinks this docu guy is real, but the guy had a different agenda
Ron intentionally mislead the docu guy for whatever disino purposes
The docu is actually good but the articles about it (like the recent daily mail one) are misleading - either intentionally or just incompetence.
The official synopsis makes me think it's a hitpiece.
If the piece is legit, it can only mean that the hammer will drop between now and the air date.
What's the reasoning for that?
First, as long as DS thinks they are in control, they will make sure a legit piece will never come out.
Second, if any declas is somehow released before the hammer drops, the rest of the DS will be able to spin it negatively and smear the whole declas, making it polluted when the actual Hammer drops.
The problem I have with option #3 is that it's HBO. There is no way IN HELL HBO will be even remotely fair. There is a better of Rachael Maddow tongue kissing Donald Trump on live TV than there is of a major production company being fair about Q.
Atleast with this MSNBC can regain some of their lost ratings !
But yeah, from what I hear it started off as a standalone docu, but even he was surprised that HBO bought it. I think good old naive Ron is being made a fool of.
Yeah, I think people need to have solid contracts drawn up by experienced lawyers, before taking part in any media pieces of any kind, no matter how its characterised. Only a very naive person would go and do interviews with no control over how that info is presented. Ron should really know better, and hence I am thinking he got it all covered.
HBO have started doing some weird documentaries recently; lower quality that previously. They've always been biased, but at least, high production values and some substance. But 'The Vow' really pissed me off as being way too drawn out and soft-hitting (especially after Starz did the much better 'Seduced'). Anyway, we'll see pretty soon!
Yes he, Fred and his father gave the interview with HBO volunteerly. Should be interesting since they also have footage from the first cracked Q password ,matlock,.
Matlock? I haven’t heard of this. Can you explain? And what do you think the meaning might be behind it?
I don’t know maybe he grew up in the 80s. Interesting is that after the first crack he changed it to M@dlock! and it got cracked too. So matlock must be from interet from Q but it’s not meant to get out to us.
I think they probably conned him into thinking it would be an objective piece and he would be able toshed light on it but I don't know how anyone who is not brain damaged would think they would do anything other than chop up the footage and make his sound stupid or misrepresent what he says so I have to think he is brain damaged or he sold out.
Or he secretly taped the whole thing while they filmed to put egg on their face?
Imho, "they" are trying to discredit Ron because of his work to out the elections fraud within the Dominion software is right on point.
So, by coupling him with QAnons, "they" think the information he disclosed about the elections machines will be "debunked".
That will not happen. We don't discard the message because of a smear job on the messenger. We know this page of their playbook.
Besides, being associated with Q is NOT a bad thing. Anons know.
Just a reminder of Ron's work...
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=7pGw7yL2-Gg
This ^
Source and tldr for those of us who aren't following this every day now, please.
Ron is the son of a co-founder of 8Chan, the site Q moved to after 4Chan. He's a mod and assisted the move.
There's an HBO documentary about to premiere which accuses him of being Q (maybe?) All of the articles misquote the other founder of 8chan in the same way to make it sound as if he directly accused Ron, while all he said was that Ron and his dad have to know who Q is:
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/hbo-documentary-qanon-ron-watkins-b1818137.html
I never got an answer for how we know the transition from 4chan to 8kun was legit. It's not like tripcodes are multi-site wide. Is it just anons taking CM's word at face value?
No outside Comms.
If Ron was Q he wouldn't tell us.
I doubt Q will be legitimately acknowledged for at least a decade.
By then my Decal will be faded but not gone.
This. Q never meant there wouldn't be other comms as obviously POTUS was communicating by Tweeting for a while. Q gave examples of what they meant. Those claiming to be Q or know who they are and are in communication with Q should be dismissed. Q meant they would not communicate privately or publicly AS Q team outside of the 8chan/8kun board. Q post 523 https://qagg.news/?q=%23%23513
"Nothing in the world is real except for Q posts"
I went 8kun...not a place for the timid.
whats the web address for 8kun as i think its blocked or something
I was showing a friend some posts when up popped the most degraded porn I've ever seen! Strange bedfellows!
You have to post sources for what you say to be a fact.
Low energy. Sad!
Sure, plenty of sources here for instance.
https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2020/10/jim-watkins-child-pornography-domains/
Mother Jones Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha
I read it, it's a bunch of spin and BS.
Smearing the witness doesn't disprove the claims.
The claims made are true and verifiable.
Preteen, rape, etc. That's enough information about Jim to form an opinion, in my opinion.
Says the faggot who thinks he's a woman
4 Hours
That's not how cognitive dissonance works I'm afraid. They'll be backing up the truck and loading up on more TDS regardless of whether Q is a larp or not.
Dissonance.
Fixed. Thank you!
Everything I've seen from Ron is that he's a showboat attention whore. Promises "bombshell" after bombshell with no receipts. I'm late to the Q show and know he's from 8kun, but after the way he acted after the election I wouldn't trust him for anything in the world. He's in it for the fame.
He also spread massive lies about Parler and helped sink that ship. Told people they require SSNs to register, etc. Total loser who happens to be lucky enough that Q posted on his website
Anything on HBO is a hit piece and not worth your time. They're an enemy platform. End of story. Whether or not that codemonkey dude is in on it, who's to say. I've never had fuzzy feelings about him. Shrug
Ron wants attention. He is about to learn. Sticking your ding-dong in a wasp nest is no way to get honey.
Couple of things:
Sounds like controlled opposition or a hit piece to me. Even if this Cullen guy was trying to make this a fair documentary, HBO has editorial power and will do whatever they want with it.
I highly doubt that Ron was part of any of the plan other than offering a platform for Q to communicate. That won't stop HBO from trying to associate him with it, allow him to get into the spotlight, then use his past to tear him down and bring Q down by association.
If Ron is saying the planned failed it's likely for one of two reasons, he is part of the disinformation version of the plan (mass arrests on Jan 20th) knowingly/unknowingly or he saying that to take the heat off himself regardless of if it's true.
Either way this will likely prove to be a bad move, especially if Ron's past is as checkered as we've hearing.
Look at Jeff Yates nitter if you have it. Says he saw whole series and it's left for interpretation who "Q" is at the end of the film. Not sure if he's legit but should be interesting at he very least.
Is this the guy that talks about the planes?
What am I missing?
Why can't they?
Not buying it, Ron goes whichever way the wind blows, always has.
Quit giving the shills constructive criticism!
I'm not suggesting it. I'm quoting Ron.
`We gave it our all, now we need to keep our chins up and go back to our lives as best we are able... We have a new president sworn in and it is our responsibility to respect the Constitution'
Jim and Ron might have painted themselves as American patriots, but that was while Jim lived in the Philippines and Ron in Japan.
That was the chans.
Get off the pills, man.
Get fucked, retard shill. Disinformation is necessary, and so is DEPORTATION
Ron was the one confirming Qs tripcode from 4chan to 8chan. Without him Q would’ve gone lost after 4chan.
Not really, the way Q was established in the first place could have been repeated, and would have been trivial. Anons would have been looking for Q if there was no reappearance.
I'm more interested in knowing how Ron is busy taking photos inside airforce 1, inside the oval office, of POTUS desk, while POTUS is on the move around the world etc while he is ostensibly living and working in the Philippines. But I guess if they were thinkers in the media, there wouldn't be nonsensical stories like this.
Maybe he didn’t take those photos and someone gave them to him...
If it would be Ron he at least got help from Dan Scavino with all the photos and confirmation from the WH.