This video and the images, the knowledge of the overdose, the knowledge of Floyd's past arrest overdose .... all of this was available to the "authorities" on day 1.
None of this is new, we've had the cell phone video for ever, the tox stuff within weeks, and the full body cam videos within a month.
Truth doesn't matter to these people. In their minds truth is subjective, rather than objective, so it is something that is chosen and they judge you on the truth you CHOOSE to believe.
Anyone who would choose to believe GF signed his own death sentence rather than being a victim of a violent uncaring force of tyranny which terrorizes the black community is a bad person because they've chosen the disgusting belief over the powerful and elevating one.
We could all be rising up against a wrong, but instead you've chosen to suggest that result was deserved, that everything went as it should, that it was all appropriate reaction after appropriate reaction - that a black man dying under the boot of a man who you believe was a good person doing a good job which resulted in a regrettable but acceptable outcome rather than one we should stand against.
For you, there is positive utility in that which is objective
For them, the objective carries negative utility - so they don't engage with it
So if you want to change their position, you can not do so with truth, and must do so entirely on narrative. Make them believe that supporting the police when they do nothing wrong against a criminal who made his life, and they'll suddenly find all the evidence in the world supporting that position. But you have to sell them on the position first, not the evidence.
Or, this is just a normal technique used daily across the world.
Are you suggesting nothing like this happened in April? March? February? 2018? 2017?
It wasn't engineered, the left just makes ammunition out of whatever is going on, regardless of whether it makes sense or not. If it was engineered they wouldn't have released a tox report that damning, or had it been an approved technique for solid reasons, or had Floyd say he can't breath while he was still in the car. If it was engineered they'd have done it in a way that would leave us no defense so they could push through their defund goals without resistance.
You folks need to learn to better vet evidence. You all keep looking for positive correlation but that's not how hypothesis testing works - you don't go looking to prove a theory (oh look, there were additional similar events around this date!) but you should instead try and disprove it (weird, nothing like this ever occurs then suddenly there were three events within days and the US even only happened after the other two failed to achieve desired results). You need a negative control, a baseline to compare about. Were these three events unusual or the norm? You never asked, you never investigated.
Falsifiability, but the inability to do so is the characteristic of a good theory. This one is garbage.
Wonder what the timeline is on the expected verdict? Remember, OJ walked free because the jurors considered it payback for Rodney king. Jurors may consider a guilty verdict payback also.
I was jury foreman on a trial for a gang member. 100% guilty. In fact, so undeniably guilty that his defense lawyer shifted the narrative to something else entirely (not what he was charged with). After the trial we get to the jury room and I thought we'd be there two minutes with a unanimous guilty vote. To my surprise, half of the jurors fell for it, they wanted to acquit because they were tricked by the lawyer's hoax, and they somehow forgot THE ACTUAL CHARGE HE WAS ON TRIAL FOR! I was livid, and in disbelief. Our second or third day of jury deliberation was a Friday, the other jurors wanted it to be over, they didn't want to return on Monday. I flat out told them how it was: I'm retired and can and will keep coming back for however many weeks it takes. Long story short, we had a unanimous guilty verdict that afternoon. Moral of the story: A lot of people are incredibly stupid, and god help anyone who finds their self judged by a jury.
I haven't seen many people talk about the bodycam footage.
I think that would change a lot of minds. It's pretty long and the cops are surprisingly patient and calm with Floyd even though he's fighting them at every turn and flopping around like a fish and crying and yelling and freaking out.
The footage I've seen stops before the knee stuff, but he's obviously high, and talks about not being able to breathe, asks to be put on the ground instead of in the police car...
Arm up Americans. He’s going to walk free, and this country will riot worse than 2020. He should walk free he is inocent...
That was the plan the entire time
I hope they walk George Floyd into the courtroom as their last piece of evidence. Holy shit would that wake some people up!
Hello George
Wow, I never could have thought of that!
We submit mr. Kirby.
If an innocent man is jailed, the people will riot and blood will be shed.
It is a lose-lose.
Racism will be accused in either case.
He's acquitted, "the justice system is racist". He's sentenced, "the police are racist".
Perfect reason to deploy the NG for riot control
Like the NG that stood and watched 2 teen girls stab someone to death without rendering aid?
No, like the 2,000 members of the NG and, potentially, the Marines that were sworn in as emergency Marshalls.
We still have our guns bloke.
and MY AXE
This video and the images, the knowledge of the overdose, the knowledge of Floyd's past arrest overdose .... all of this was available to the "authorities" on day 1.
None of this is new, we've had the cell phone video for ever, the tox stuff within weeks, and the full body cam videos within a month.
Truth doesn't matter to these people. In their minds truth is subjective, rather than objective, so it is something that is chosen and they judge you on the truth you CHOOSE to believe.
Anyone who would choose to believe GF signed his own death sentence rather than being a victim of a violent uncaring force of tyranny which terrorizes the black community is a bad person because they've chosen the disgusting belief over the powerful and elevating one.
We could all be rising up against a wrong, but instead you've chosen to suggest that result was deserved, that everything went as it should, that it was all appropriate reaction after appropriate reaction - that a black man dying under the boot of a man who you believe was a good person doing a good job which resulted in a regrettable but acceptable outcome rather than one we should stand against.
Truth never enters the picture.
Scary but that is pretty much it.
For you, there is positive utility in that which is objective
For them, the objective carries negative utility - so they don't engage with it
So if you want to change their position, you can not do so with truth, and must do so entirely on narrative. Make them believe that supporting the police when they do nothing wrong against a criminal who made his life, and they'll suddenly find all the evidence in the world supporting that position. But you have to sell them on the position first, not the evidence.
Username checks out. Hail, O Wise One!
Floyd and Chauvin are BOTH crisis actors, as were also these other twats.
Or, this is just a normal technique used daily across the world.
Are you suggesting nothing like this happened in April? March? February? 2018? 2017?
It wasn't engineered, the left just makes ammunition out of whatever is going on, regardless of whether it makes sense or not. If it was engineered they wouldn't have released a tox report that damning, or had it been an approved technique for solid reasons, or had Floyd say he can't breath while he was still in the car. If it was engineered they'd have done it in a way that would leave us no defense so they could push through their defund goals without resistance.
You folks need to learn to better vet evidence. You all keep looking for positive correlation but that's not how hypothesis testing works - you don't go looking to prove a theory (oh look, there were additional similar events around this date!) but you should instead try and disprove it (weird, nothing like this ever occurs then suddenly there were three events within days and the US even only happened after the other two failed to achieve desired results). You need a negative control, a baseline to compare about. Were these three events unusual or the norm? You never asked, you never investigated.
Falsifiability, but the inability to do so is the characteristic of a good theory. This one is garbage.
shitty job to take, your employer put you in jail.
So they say...
....if you can believe anything these days.
When he is found not guilty and the riots start, wouldn't that be the perfect time for the military to step in and take control?
Bunch of pregnant women trying to stop rioters. This is going to be a shit show.
or are they obese trannies as female docs because the male doc slots were filled
no - Stumble Bumble would never authorize it
Wasn’t there a video of him being loaded into an ambulance and still alive?!?!?
Yeah but chauvin injected the fentynol into him with his knee.
I find that sitting on the couch filling 30rd magazines is relaxing.
Imagine his life after his is acquitted? Not sure how he would proceed
Move to Florida, or Texas.
Wonder what the timeline is on the expected verdict? Remember, OJ walked free because the jurors considered it payback for Rodney king. Jurors may consider a guilty verdict payback also.
I forget how fucking stupid the average person is until I read shit like this
I was jury foreman on a trial for a gang member. 100% guilty. In fact, so undeniably guilty that his defense lawyer shifted the narrative to something else entirely (not what he was charged with). After the trial we get to the jury room and I thought we'd be there two minutes with a unanimous guilty vote. To my surprise, half of the jurors fell for it, they wanted to acquit because they were tricked by the lawyer's hoax, and they somehow forgot THE ACTUAL CHARGE HE WAS ON TRIAL FOR! I was livid, and in disbelief. Our second or third day of jury deliberation was a Friday, the other jurors wanted it to be over, they didn't want to return on Monday. I flat out told them how it was: I'm retired and can and will keep coming back for however many weeks it takes. Long story short, we had a unanimous guilty verdict that afternoon. Moral of the story: A lot of people are incredibly stupid, and god help anyone who finds their self judged by a jury.
It’s bad. This country is barely worth saving
I haven't seen many people talk about the bodycam footage.
I think that would change a lot of minds. It's pretty long and the cops are surprisingly patient and calm with Floyd even though he's fighting them at every turn and flopping around like a fish and crying and yelling and freaking out.
The footage I've seen stops before the knee stuff, but he's obviously high, and talks about not being able to breathe, asks to be put on the ground instead of in the police car...
I don't think I saved it though.
Does anyone know the timeline of this trial? How is set up when is it supposed deliberate?
BBC says it’s expected to take at least a month. BBC link
The jury can deliberate for a while, though, so it may be longer.
That is why NG was deployed. Q knows he walks free but it gave them the ability to stealth deploy. A theory....
Seriously don't give a fuck about a dead George Floyd. My ability to care went away when the blm fags started their lies.