Just wait until people find out about VAERS and related reporting tools. They will go ballistic. I just hope the word gets out to the masses sooner rather than later.
Could this whole scenario be related to Q’s post that “class action lawsuits” are very powerful? Is this all a set up to actually bring down big Pharmaceutical? Perhaps there will be something to reverse the hidden effects of these vaccines to allow a percentage to recover... just speculating.
Class action lawsuits: The potential is there, but they have immunity from prosecution. I am not sure how far the extends, or if there are loopholes there. I have not looked into it. Even if not, these companies are toast if the truth gets out. You can't make money if everyone believes you have committed crimes against humanity (which they are doing).
Reverse effects of vaccine: Doubtful. The good news is, they aren't THAT bad. These vaccines do not appear to be a depopulation level event. The death rate according to the current data (which may be underreported) is about 1:20,000. The serious side effect rate is about 1:500 (or less). It could be worse.
Instead of trying to shut me down without evidence, please provide evidence to support your claim.
I remember specifically Trump talking about Pfizer and Moderna requiring indemnity before Project Warp Speed would be undertaken. Looking it up I find a ton of stories that corroborate my statement. These are just the first three to come up on a search.
As I said, I don't know the extent, or if there are loopholes, but to say "I clearly know nothing about it" is obviously not true. If you can prove me wrong, please do so. I would like to be.
I misspoke. I should have used the word indemnity. In context it means the same thing to everyone but you. Nevertheless, mea culpa. You still haven't addressed the topic directly.
You still have not refuted my claim that they have indemnity. And what does twitter have to do with anything?
Do you go around to doctors, lawyers and other professionals contending that they need to prove fundamental aspects of their topic areas to you?
I am a scientist. I do that all the time. You could even say its my whole life, so yes.
A persons profession is irrelevant. A persons argument is based on the argument, not their profession. I post things on my area of expertise all the time (cell and molecular biology, nanotechnology and physics, to a lesser extent computer science). I also worked in tax law for several years. I do not let those experiences dilute my argument. If my argument is insufficient, it is insufficient, regardless of past experience.
And so is yours.
I am not saying I am right, but you still have not provided evidence that I am wrong. You haven't even addressed my claim directly.
I was also under the impression that vaccine manufacturers cannot be held liable if you have an adverse vaccine reaction. Is the previous comment saying something else? If they can be sued then what is the process?
My wife has just had a weird conversation with her hairdresser.
She had to have a patch test for the dye and for the first time ever my wife had a reaction to the dye, but the the hairdresser asked her if she'd had the vaccine (which she hasn't).
When prompted further, apparently a lot of people have been having weird reactions to hair dye since having had the vaccine, quite a lot more than usual they said.
Not heard of this from anywhere else, it might be worth asking some hairdressers if they've seen the same reactions in people who've been vaxxed.
Is Propylethylene glycol in the dye? Because that's what's holding these RNA proteins together in the shot. 70% of Americans are already sensitized to it, therefore the reactions happen after the shot.
Did your wife have covid ever? I had a friend who got covid in Aug and passed away a month ago due to blood clots in the heart and lungs. If the vaccine is created from the virus and the virus was modified to cause certain problems, maybe we are stuck with health risks and side effects whether exposed to the virus or vaccinated.
We both had some 'odd' symptoms last year which might have been covid, certainly nothing like a full blown cold or flu, just partial symptoms one day, nothing the next and then something slightly different the next day etc.
We are both fairly healthy and get plenty of sunshine and vitamins so it's possible we had it without getting any severe symptoms. Never got tested though, I didn't trust the car park attendant to be able to stick a rod up into my brain pan without damaging something.
Please remember the vaccine was NOT created from the virus. The mRNA gene therapy was designed to reprogram your immune system to attack what they believe to be the virus. Even J&J vaccine was not created from the virus. It is a programed adenovirus used to similarly program your immune system to attack the virus.
So a quick rundown on adjuvant-based vaccines and side effects because it’s relevant.
Adjuvant vaccines usually contain a dead virus to try and create immunity. Except your body will not react to a dead virus because it is dead.
An adjuvant is specifically designed to irritate the immune system, and provoke a response.
However, when these vaccines contain hundreds of ingredients and possible contamination, how does your immune system know what to fight?
Many people believe this led to the rise in autoimmune diseases and allergies, as vaccines contain human fetal tissue. The body may be reacting to its own human tissue, thinking that’s what caused the original irritation.
The COVID shot may be something similar, where an ingredient in hair dye was used in the vaccine, so now people are allergic.
I remember when going to Cosmetology school when clients wanted to get a color done we would have them come in the day before to do the patch test. Now, I have lupus. I can tolerate the hair color. I was talking to other people who have lupus and they could not have their hair colored. They could do tattoos. So , I would probably not handle tattoo. Since, lupus attacks each individual differently its hard to tell.
Which I believe was Trumps ultimate goal and the meaning, in part at least, of Hunt for Red October. Turn towards the danger, shorten the distance, skirt by before detonation.
IMO
Best scenario for depopulation planners is an injection which produces varied serious and fatal symptoms which are not easily correlated to the injection and can be blamed on other factors such as a new virus variant.
It is best to get everyone injected before the symptoms start so that there are no symptoms to connect with the injection before coverage is complete.
The last thing the depopulation planners want is fatal allergic reactions and bloodclots within days of the injection which can be correlated with it. Then the vaccine become distrusted before coverage is complete.
This would not matter if there were mandatory vaccines and iron fisted control. IMO Trump headed this off with his Red October turn-towards-the-torpedo. i.e his endorsement of the vaccine and his move to rush it so that it is experimental and not mandatory.
My wife works at a very busy obgyn that sees hundreds of pregnant women per week. Most are now vaccinated. She told me miscarriages have been way down since Covid started and they haven't seen a lot of change since vaccines started.
She did say that they're getting asked about this constantly and the doc advises them to get vaccines while she is openly telling then to do their own research.
That’s interesting that they’re down since Covid started, not just the vaccine. I wonder what the correlation could be? More people working from home so more time to put your “feet up”/rest throughout your your work day which would then cause less stress on your pregnant body? ?
It’s probably because no one has been out at the club partying and picking someone to have sex with. No sex no unwanted pregnancies. I’m thinking that the women who got the shot while pregnant & that are miscarrying are probably women who Want to have their babies.
I suppose just adding my own anecdotal evidence to the list, but working at a walgreens, I've had an unusual amount of women coming in, buying pads because they just had a miscarriage, or men coming in talking about their wife having a miscarriage, and needing supplies.
Ive had 3 just this week.
I heard of miscarriages as soon as the vaccinations started happening, but you know everything is kept quiet.
Blood clots as prevalent with Pfizer and Moderna vaccine as with AstraZeneca's: study
Published: April 15, 2021 at 6:05 a.m. ET
By Steve Goldstein
A study by Oxford University found the number of people who receive blood clots after getting vaccinated with a coronavirus vaccine are about the same for those who get Pfizer and Moderna vaccines as they are for the AstraZeneca vaccine that was produced with the university's help. According to the study, 4 in 1 million people experience cerebral venous thrombosis after getting the Pfizer or Moderna vaccine, versus 5 in 1 million people for the AstraZeneca vaccine. The risk of getting CVT is much higher for those who get COVID-19 -- 39 in a million patients -- than it is for those for get vaccinated. AstraZeneca's...
What Biden’s First 100 Days Mean For You and Your Money
You have reached your article limit. To continue reading, subscribe today for unlimited access to MarketWatch. Get the tools you need to succeed in the market, with real-time market data, news, and analysis.
I was thinking, the ones who get the coof from the shot are doubly fracked then? Especially having this come from Market watch I get the feeling this is a form of advertising war gone wrong thanks to the big guy.
Because it is the spike protein NOT the virus which causes abnormal clotting of the blood. What is the vax teaching your body to make? The fucking spike protein.
I'm kinda hoping the vaccine really does kill a lot of people. I'm sick of being the only person who sees what's going on in the world. 20+ yrs thinking I'm out of my mind. At least vaccine deaths will cull the gullible and we will have a more even distribution of morons and non morons.
Just wait until people find out about VAERS and related reporting tools. They will go ballistic. I just hope the word gets out to the masses sooner rather than later.
Could this whole scenario be related to Q’s post that “class action lawsuits” are very powerful? Is this all a set up to actually bring down big Pharmaceutical? Perhaps there will be something to reverse the hidden effects of these vaccines to allow a percentage to recover... just speculating.
Class action lawsuits: The potential is there, but they have immunity from prosecution. I am not sure how far the extends, or if there are loopholes there. I have not looked into it. Even if not, these companies are toast if the truth gets out. You can't make money if everyone believes you have committed crimes against humanity (which they are doing).
Reverse effects of vaccine: Doubtful. The good news is, they aren't THAT bad. These vaccines do not appear to be a depopulation level event. The death rate according to the current data (which may be underreported) is about 1:20,000. The serious side effect rate is about 1:500 (or less). It could be worse.
Instead of trying to shut me down without evidence, please provide evidence to support your claim.
I remember specifically Trump talking about Pfizer and Moderna requiring indemnity before Project Warp Speed would be undertaken. Looking it up I find a ton of stories that corroborate my statement. These are just the first three to come up on a search.
Here is one.
Here is another
Here is another.
The list goes on and on.
As I said, I don't know the extent, or if there are loopholes, but to say "I clearly know nothing about it" is obviously not true. If you can prove me wrong, please do so. I would like to be.
I misspoke. I should have used the word indemnity. In context it means the same thing to everyone but you. Nevertheless, mea culpa. You still haven't addressed the topic directly.
You still have not refuted my claim that they have indemnity. And what does twitter have to do with anything?
I am a scientist. I do that all the time. You could even say its my whole life, so yes.
A persons profession is irrelevant. A persons argument is based on the argument, not their profession. I post things on my area of expertise all the time (cell and molecular biology, nanotechnology and physics, to a lesser extent computer science). I also worked in tax law for several years. I do not let those experiences dilute my argument. If my argument is insufficient, it is insufficient, regardless of past experience.
And so is yours.
I am not saying I am right, but you still have not provided evidence that I am wrong. You haven't even addressed my claim directly.
I was also under the impression that vaccine manufacturers cannot be held liable if you have an adverse vaccine reaction. Is the previous comment saying something else? If they can be sued then what is the process?
My wife has just had a weird conversation with her hairdresser.
She had to have a patch test for the dye and for the first time ever my wife had a reaction to the dye, but the the hairdresser asked her if she'd had the vaccine (which she hasn't).
When prompted further, apparently a lot of people have been having weird reactions to hair dye since having had the vaccine, quite a lot more than usual they said.
Not heard of this from anywhere else, it might be worth asking some hairdressers if they've seen the same reactions in people who've been vaxxed.
Is Propylethylene glycol in the dye? Because that's what's holding these RNA proteins together in the shot. 70% of Americans are already sensitized to it, therefore the reactions happen after the shot.
I'm not sure, when my wife called them about it the only chemical mentioned was ammonia.
This is in those water flavor enhancers!!
Like mio and crystal light?
YES
Did your wife have covid ever? I had a friend who got covid in Aug and passed away a month ago due to blood clots in the heart and lungs. If the vaccine is created from the virus and the virus was modified to cause certain problems, maybe we are stuck with health risks and side effects whether exposed to the virus or vaccinated.
That's a good question.
We both had some 'odd' symptoms last year which might have been covid, certainly nothing like a full blown cold or flu, just partial symptoms one day, nothing the next and then something slightly different the next day etc.
We are both fairly healthy and get plenty of sunshine and vitamins so it's possible we had it without getting any severe symptoms. Never got tested though, I didn't trust the car park attendant to be able to stick a rod up into my brain pan without damaging something.
Please remember the vaccine was NOT created from the virus. The mRNA gene therapy was designed to reprogram your immune system to attack what they believe to be the virus. Even J&J vaccine was not created from the virus. It is a programed adenovirus used to similarly program your immune system to attack the virus.
What is it attacking if Covid doesn't exist?
That is certainly the billion dollar question.
Our freedoms?
If they were both made in a lab, symbiotically, they should yield similar symptoms and after affects. It's just my guess.
So a quick rundown on adjuvant-based vaccines and side effects because it’s relevant.
Adjuvant vaccines usually contain a dead virus to try and create immunity. Except your body will not react to a dead virus because it is dead.
An adjuvant is specifically designed to irritate the immune system, and provoke a response.
However, when these vaccines contain hundreds of ingredients and possible contamination, how does your immune system know what to fight?
Many people believe this led to the rise in autoimmune diseases and allergies, as vaccines contain human fetal tissue. The body may be reacting to its own human tissue, thinking that’s what caused the original irritation.
The COVID shot may be something similar, where an ingredient in hair dye was used in the vaccine, so now people are allergic.
"However, when these vaccines contain hundreds of ingredients and possible contamination, how does your immune system know what to fight?
Many people believe this led to the rise in autoimmune diseases and allergies,"
You'll find this interview with a retired vaccine researcher very informative:
https://miepbos.nl/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/email-prik-2019.pdf
First 10 pages is the interview, the rest are just comments from people.
I remember when going to Cosmetology school when clients wanted to get a color done we would have them come in the day before to do the patch test. Now, I have lupus. I can tolerate the hair color. I was talking to other people who have lupus and they could not have their hair colored. They could do tattoos. So , I would probably not handle tattoo. Since, lupus attacks each individual differently its hard to tell.
Which I believe was Trumps ultimate goal and the meaning, in part at least, of Hunt for Red October. Turn towards the danger, shorten the distance, skirt by before detonation.
<Whoa.jpg> I like where your head's at.
These 'vaccines' are faulty.
They aren't meant to kill people this early.
I thinks some are.
IMO Best scenario for depopulation planners is an injection which produces varied serious and fatal symptoms which are not easily correlated to the injection and can be blamed on other factors such as a new virus variant. It is best to get everyone injected before the symptoms start so that there are no symptoms to connect with the injection before coverage is complete.
The last thing the depopulation planners want is fatal allergic reactions and bloodclots within days of the injection which can be correlated with it. Then the vaccine become distrusted before coverage is complete.
This would not matter if there were mandatory vaccines and iron fisted control. IMO Trump headed this off with his Red October turn-towards-the-torpedo. i.e his endorsement of the vaccine and his move to rush it so that it is experimental and not mandatory.
If you’re sick with a long term illness, they can also siphon money off you for years in costly tests and medical treatment.
If you or a loved one was injected with the astra seneca vaccine, call us now. You may be entitled to compensation. Operators are standing by.
Coworkers buddy works at Pfizer...told him miscarriages with the vax are up 6,000%...."but don't tell anybody"
Is that for real??? He needs to scream it from the hills!!! Pregnant Women are being LIED to.
100% real fren. I told him to contact project veritas.
I hope he does. This is PURE EVIL. It's like forcing abortions on people against their consent.
My wife works at a very busy obgyn that sees hundreds of pregnant women per week. Most are now vaccinated. She told me miscarriages have been way down since Covid started and they haven't seen a lot of change since vaccines started.
She did say that they're getting asked about this constantly and the doc advises them to get vaccines while she is openly telling then to do their own research.
That’s interesting that they’re down since Covid started, not just the vaccine. I wonder what the correlation could be? More people working from home so more time to put your “feet up”/rest throughout your your work day which would then cause less stress on your pregnant body? ?
That would be my guess, and less exposure to colds and flus and stuff.
It’s probably because no one has been out at the club partying and picking someone to have sex with. No sex no unwanted pregnancies. I’m thinking that the women who got the shot while pregnant & that are miscarrying are probably women who Want to have their babies.
Good Lord. I second having him go to Veritas. People need to know this.
I suppose just adding my own anecdotal evidence to the list, but working at a walgreens, I've had an unusual amount of women coming in, buying pads because they just had a miscarriage, or men coming in talking about their wife having a miscarriage, and needing supplies.
Ive had 3 just this week.
I heard of miscarriages as soon as the vaccinations started happening, but you know everything is kept quiet.
Blood clots as prevalent with Pfizer and Moderna vaccine as with AstraZeneca's: study Published: April 15, 2021 at 6:05 a.m. ET By Steve Goldstein
A study by Oxford University found the number of people who receive blood clots after getting vaccinated with a coronavirus vaccine are about the same for those who get Pfizer and Moderna vaccines as they are for the AstraZeneca vaccine that was produced with the university's help. According to the study, 4 in 1 million people experience cerebral venous thrombosis after getting the Pfizer or Moderna vaccine, versus 5 in 1 million people for the AstraZeneca vaccine. The risk of getting CVT is much higher for those who get COVID-19 -- 39 in a million patients -- than it is for those for get vaccinated. AstraZeneca's...
What Biden’s First 100 Days Mean For You and Your Money You have reached your article limit. To continue reading, subscribe today for unlimited access to MarketWatch. Get the tools you need to succeed in the market, with real-time market data, news, and analysis.
"The risk of getting CVT is much higher for those who get COVID-19 -- 39 in a million patients -- than it is for those for get vaccinated. "
Given that these products are not even claiming protection from getting Wuhan Flu, this statement is utterly non sensical.
I had to read that sentence at least 4 times and still kept reading while scoffing about it.
Preposterous!
I was thinking, the ones who get the coof from the shot are doubly fracked then? Especially having this come from Market watch I get the feeling this is a form of advertising war gone wrong thanks to the big guy.
Because it is the spike protein NOT the virus which causes abnormal clotting of the blood. What is the vax teaching your body to make? The fucking spike protein.
Well than those of us with Lyden factor 5 will have no part of this. Not that I was going to get the jab anyhow.
Found this in the article:
https://www.marketwatch.com/articles/biden-wants-to-spend-2-trillion-on-infrastructure-these-stocks-stand-to-gain-the-most-51617402161?mod=mw_more_headlines
Anyone care to dig on these companies that stand to gain the most?
This doesn’t mention the J&J vaccine - this is the one pulled by the cdc. What is the comparison there?
now we know that ALL THREE vaccines are causing blood clots, and a lot more. Is this the end of the gene therapy experiment. Hope so!!
I'm kinda hoping the vaccine really does kill a lot of people. I'm sick of being the only person who sees what's going on in the world. 20+ yrs thinking I'm out of my mind. At least vaccine deaths will cull the gullible and we will have a more even distribution of morons and non morons.
4 per 1 million is not VERY BAD. Not trying to rain on your parade or anything but did you even read the article before you posted it?