We do anyway dont we? Its not like our bill goes up when we lock em up. Most of the prison system is private now and guarantees a certain level of occupancy for the state to use as cheap labour. Id rather it be pedos than weed smokers in there.
Fair enough. Personally i have a bit of a vindictive vengeance streak in me, and would like knowing they felt first hand what they did to those kids from others. Then just let the criminals in prison finish the job, slowly, so the pedos can experience every moment of torture they doled out on others.
A bullet to the head is just too clean. Bullet up the arse however....
There needs to be more of this kind of punishment. 95% of the crime is committed by 5% of the population. B Gates would be happy to support this method of reducing the population by 5%; so I bet he would pay for the ammo.
I also came here to ask this. You know the 1 is a diddler for sure, every decent person and most bad people would support this. Definitely speaks volumes about that 1
Not that I'm an expert at comprehension of liberal brain impulses (I wouldn't call what they do 'thinking') but if I understand the story correctly she's triggered at the idea of mandatory sentencing, because she believes too many non-white offenders are already serving time under mandatory sentences for whatever crime they committed. She wants prison population demographics to more closely resemble population demographics outside of prison walls.
There were 5 Dems and 3 Reps who didn't vote! I put them in with the one that voted against.Rep. Chavez, Cesar [D]
Rep. Espinoza, Diego [D]
Rep. Finchem, Mark W. [R]
Rep. Hernandez, Alma [D]
Rep. Hernandez, Daniel [D]
Rep. Jermaine, Jennifer [D]
Rep. Pratt, Franklin "Frank" M. [R]
Rep. Wilmeth, Justin [R]
Yup! In this instance not voting is the same as is if you’d voted no! You either want to do everything in your power to protect innocent children from sickos or you don’t. It’s that simple. ??♀️
After years of John and Cindy McCain, followed by the fraudulent election certification, I never thought I'd say this, but the AZ republicans are starting to earn my respect.
I like this in concept, but remember, in the age of the internet, Child Porn can be planted, and the FBI isnt our friends. That being said, actual pedophiles should be put in a 40 by 40 foot cage with 12 year old chimpanzees and then left there until the bits can be removed.
Can we trade life in prison for public hanging? Why should the public, and especially the child's family, pay taxes to house, clothe, feed, heat and entertain ( cable, gym, etc ) a child sex offender for life?
Yeah, no. Anyone who distributes this stuff should get life in jail or the death penalty. Once someone crosses that line they don't come back, and distribution could also imply that they create the material as well. You don't think people who kidnap children and force them to make 'videos' deserve life in prison or worse? It's human trafficking.
So pornographers who are being lied to by the mob/government and issue out fake id's to kids for the purposes of voting should receive the death penalty?
Or should the government receive the death penalty?
What kind of straw man argument is that? That's like saying people who meet up with an adult only to find out they're a child. Are they going to show up on Hansen vs Predator? No? No shit. This is about knowingly distributing. You're not even making a point here.
Listen, I don't mind, but the government has a history of creating fake identities and supporting child sex trafficking. Why wouldn't they go after legal pornographers that are in their way?
Here's the one person that voted Nay on it:
Rep. Powers Hannley, Pamela [D]
Who is this bitch? According to NewsWars:
State Rep. Hannley, who called herself “the Bernie Sanders of Tucson with Hillary Clinton’s gender issues” during her campaign in Tuscon’s Legislative District 9, was the only member of the Arizona House to vote against the bill, seemingly decrying it as racist in her explanation.
“Justice is not blind or color blind in the United States and so mandatory sentencing is a part of the problem. If we had a fairer justice system, then the population in prison would look more like the population of the country and that’s not the case,” Hannley, 69, said of the bill.
Hannley further complained that the legislation could “disproportionately” impact “people of color” in a Facebook post.
Spending your life in jail, where pedos usually get raped in turn by other inmates, feels far more satisfying a punishment...
Then you can pony up the money to pay for allowing them to exist.
We do anyway dont we? Its not like our bill goes up when we lock em up. Most of the prison system is private now and guarantees a certain level of occupancy for the state to use as cheap labour. Id rather it be pedos than weed smokers in there.
I'd rather pedos be dead and pot smokers not be in jail at all.
Fair enough. Personally i have a bit of a vindictive vengeance streak in me, and would like knowing they felt first hand what they did to those kids from others. Then just let the criminals in prison finish the job, slowly, so the pedos can experience every moment of torture they doled out on others.
A bullet to the head is just too clean. Bullet up the arse however....
Well, there's always the lake of fire after the fir9ng squad. It's Inevitable and cost effective. Clean and swift. ?
I'd be fine with that or a wood chipper, industrial hydraulic press, or a helicopter ride.
Considering the legal costs to put someone to death, it’s probably cheaper to just pay the $75k per year for the rest of their life.
There needs to be more of this kind of punishment. 95% of the crime is committed by 5% of the population. B Gates would be happy to support this method of reducing the population by 5%; so I bet he would pay for the ammo.
Some people do not deserve to exist on this plane of existence and they should be dealt with accordingly. Enough is enough.
Should be the death penalty for sure, but I’ll take take them off the street for life too even at our expense.
Who the fuck was the “1”? It was 51-1...
Bahahaha! Came here to say this! ?Whoever it was outed themselves in a big way!
I also came here to ask this. You know the 1 is a diddler for sure, every decent person and most bad people would support this. Definitely speaks volumes about that 1
She's against mandatory sentencing, not pro child diddling.
Weak excuse. She has 100% partaken.
Either way, she died on the wrong damn hill today.
If rand paul was a lawyer
Rep. Pamela Powers Hannley! AZ elected a real winner with this one.
https://legiscan.com/AZ/rollcall/HB2889/id/1018143
https://nationalfile.com/video-dem-lawmaker-opposes-arizona-bill-that-raises-sentences-for-pedophiles-because-it-would-hurt-people-of-color/
> because it would hurt people of color
> bill is about child porn and sex trafficking
So...is she implying that "people of color" are pedos? Or did she just not get the memo to vote against the pedo bill?
Not that I'm an expert at comprehension of liberal brain impulses (I wouldn't call what they do 'thinking') but if I understand the story correctly she's triggered at the idea of mandatory sentencing, because she believes too many non-white offenders are already serving time under mandatory sentences for whatever crime they committed. She wants prison population demographics to more closely resemble population demographics outside of prison walls.
A likely excuse....
There were 5 Dems and 3 Reps who didn't vote! I put them in with the one that voted against.Rep. Chavez, Cesar [D] Rep. Espinoza, Diego [D] Rep. Finchem, Mark W. [R] Rep. Hernandez, Alma [D] Rep. Hernandez, Daniel [D] Rep. Jermaine, Jennifer [D] Rep. Pratt, Franklin "Frank" M. [R] Rep. Wilmeth, Justin [R]
Yup! In this instance not voting is the same as is if you’d voted no! You either want to do everything in your power to protect innocent children from sickos or you don’t. It’s that simple. ??♀️
Yes, that is how I see it. The only way not to vote is if you are in a coma.
YUGE win!!
sweet!!! 'tis time to protect our future generations!
For life? Perfect.
Who the fuck voted no?
Ah, shit. Here we go again...
After years of John and Cindy McCain, followed by the fraudulent election certification, I never thought I'd say this, but the AZ republicans are starting to earn my respect.
Nice, Feelsgood.exe
Fuck that. Take them out back and put a few dozen into the back of their head. Screw paying to keep them alive for decades.
I like this in concept, but remember, in the age of the internet, Child Porn can be planted, and the FBI isnt our friends. That being said, actual pedophiles should be put in a 40 by 40 foot cage with 12 year old chimpanzees and then left there until the bits can be removed.
The one who voted no. Who cares about color? A sex offender is a sex offender. That is all.
God bless them
This guys got balls!!! Thank you Rep. Leo!!!!!! Good luck!!!!
Thank you! This is very encouraging news! It makes me wonder what ties the one person who voted again it, has.
Can we trade life in prison for public hanging? Why should the public, and especially the child's family, pay taxes to house, clothe, feed, heat and entertain ( cable, gym, etc ) a child sex offender for life?
life for kiddie porn distribution? seems a bit extreme for first time offenders.
Um.... first offenders will always be repeat offenders when it comes to pedos. Hence the bill.
Read my other response to the other pede.
Yeah, no. Anyone who distributes this stuff should get life in jail or the death penalty. Once someone crosses that line they don't come back, and distribution could also imply that they create the material as well. You don't think people who kidnap children and force them to make 'videos' deserve life in prison or worse? It's human trafficking.
So pornographers who are being lied to by the mob/government and issue out fake id's to kids for the purposes of voting should receive the death penalty?
Or should the government receive the death penalty?
What kind of straw man argument is that? That's like saying people who meet up with an adult only to find out they're a child. Are they going to show up on Hansen vs Predator? No? No shit. This is about knowingly distributing. You're not even making a point here.
Listen, I don't mind, but the government has a history of creating fake identities and supporting child sex trafficking. Why wouldn't they go after legal pornographers that are in their way?
I would agree for possession. Not as much for distribution.
Distribution is leagues worse than possession, and I think that way more focus should go on busting the creators and distributors of the material
Yes. You are correct. I was thinking 20-50 years.
Also most is distributed over the internet now so that chance of catching someone in AZ is lower.
This could be used to go after pornographers who are being targetted by competition or government. Sending in underage girls with fake id.
who's that 1 that voted against?
DS is gonna have a blast putting patriots in AZ away for planted kiddy porn. You know it'll happen.
Here's the one person that voted Nay on it: Rep. Powers Hannley, Pamela [D] Who is this bitch? According to NewsWars: State Rep. Hannley, who called herself “the Bernie Sanders of Tucson with Hillary Clinton’s gender issues” during her campaign in Tuscon’s Legislative District 9, was the only member of the Arizona House to vote against the bill, seemingly decrying it as racist in her explanation.
“Justice is not blind or color blind in the United States and so mandatory sentencing is a part of the problem. If we had a fairer justice system, then the population in prison would look more like the population of the country and that’s not the case,” Hannley, 69, said of the bill.
Hannley further complained that the legislation could “disproportionately” impact “people of color” in a Facebook post.
Good step. Next step is chemical castration.