“The more people we get vaccinated, the more success we’re going to have in the fight against this virus,” Biden proclaimed from the White House on June 2.
The best of the 'vaccines' is 2% effective, rather short of the 95% the company claimed. And the worst of them is under 1% effective. Even if they were completely safe and tested (and clearly neither of these is true), there still would be no reason to get them on the basis of how ineffective they are.
An exchange between Naomi Wolf and RFK Jr. on March - basically, she clued in that it is just like Microsoft and their software patches. That's the template. Excerpt:
(NW) By the way, I just wanna tell you, I was de-platformed for quoting almost verbatim the language on the Moderna website that describe the mRNA process because I was really struck that they provided a kind of side-by-side comparison for investors and for shareholders and maybe for consumers that show how traditional vaccines, you can only kinda use them once, and you have to kind of deal with them in a not very cost effective way, but the Moderna mRNA vaccine is like, they said, a software platform that you can upload new software to. And I was thinking, “This is a business model.” It’s just gonna, you know, they’re gonna tweak it and change it, tweak it and change it, tweak it and change it once you have that initial shot. But they were presented-
– (RFK) And Tony Fauci, the reason he gave 2.6 billion in our taxpayer money to that company is because that platform, if he can show that it works for the Moderna vaccine, he will own it for all medicines. Oh, he owns it forever.
– He owns-
– Oh, I mean, not him, but NIAID, his agency, which is his power. I mean, it’s like you can’t separate him from NIAID anymore than you can Bill Gates from the Gates Foundation ’cause people are not trying to make currency there. Money for them is currency, but it’s a currency of power. It’s purchasing power over other human beings, and that’s why everybody ultimately wants to accumulate more money than they can spend in a lifetime.>
It is a great exchange. The video is there but they transcribed it because he can be hard to understand.
Printing billions, if not even trillions, by getting "everyone" vaccinated.
Achieve full totalitarian control.
If overpopulation is their concern (which by everything known about upcoming science and tech is an uneducated and unrealistic claim), then they can just leave people fighting over crumbs.
They control logistics, so they can just let entire towns disappear without anybody knowing. After all, they controlled all the media as well.
Unfortunately, most liberals I know have gleefully received the jabs already. But, I have had luck changing the minds of some by simply reminding them of how much they used to hate the evil pharmaceutical companies. That used to be something we all agreed on...
They're blind and deaf. I tried that line but they'll just ignore me and say "geeett vaccinnattteed."
The ancients say that sexual sins blind the intellect so you cannot see the truth at all. This is why fornication, porn, and birth control need to be illegal so we won't have leftists get to this point of total blindness.
So if 40% of the country hasn't been jabbed and 78% of that number will not change their mind, it's really like 31% of total Americans or around 100 million.
That will still roughly give them the 70% vaccinated rate they are looking for, which is what they want for a veto-proof super majority of voters when they try to take away the rights of the vaccinated. Most difficult to pass legislation requires a 2/3 vote, which 70% will comfortably put them at.
PSA: Never accept or amplify the term "Vaccine Hesitant." That implies somebody just needs a little push to get them to come back over to the side that they already know is normal.
NLP-level framing. I'm no more "hesitant" to get the vaccine than I'm "hesitant" to go get hit by a car.
For the sake of argument, let's say its legit they just horrifically fucked up the marketing/ messaging.
They have a very very long road ahead to regain credibility and nurture confidence. The continued pummeling of any discussion around side effects is a big deal that must be addressed. the conflict of interest between the people pushing rhe pandemic and the people who stand to gain from the supposed cure MUST be addressed.
The origins of the virus must be addressed. How it effected the election and its legitimacy MUST be addressed
There cannot be any "whoopsy our bad" allowed for this.
Can we please stop calling it a vaccine, and stop saying vaccinated since we all know this is not a vaccine and you're not getting vaccinated. It's an experimental genetic therapy with unknown outcomes.
Thats why they started calling it a "jab". It is not actually a vaccine, it doesn't stimulate production of antibodies prepared from the causative agent of a disease. It changes your DNA.
When we don’t know our rights or the law, we can get railroaded. They cannot mandate, force, without informed consent. People are getting this toxin injected without INFORMED consent. This is crime against humanity dealt by the ICC. We have international law, Nuremberg Code Article 6.
I have a friend in the hospital and another relative paralyzed from their waist down after the second Moderna and Pfizer shot. Why would I like to join them?
That number is very likely to grow as new peer review information if published that correctly identifies the very serious consequences of the mRNA vaccine.
That's the amount of people who won't take it, out of the ones who haven't.
The article says 78% of unvaxxed are unlikely to change their mind. But percentage of vaxxed isn't really high at all, according to the page below. The state with the highest percentage of vaxxed is only at 59%. Lowest is 27.5% percent vaxxed,
The percentages are listed under the map by state name, and I sorted the list by percentage. I added the percent at the beginning of the line for the sorting but it's just duplicated from the number at the end,
The best of the 'vaccines' is 2% effective, rather short of the 95% the company claimed. And the worst of them is under 1% effective. Even if they were completely safe and tested (and clearly neither of these is true), there still would be no reason to get them on the basis of how ineffective they are.
https://greatawakening.win/p/12ih0MHSPW/the-lancet-is-this-saying-that-t/c/
The boosters are just the follow ups and these people are lining up to be lab rats.
An exchange between Naomi Wolf and RFK Jr. on March - basically, she clued in that it is just like Microsoft and their software patches. That's the template. Excerpt:
– (RFK) And Tony Fauci, the reason he gave 2.6 billion in our taxpayer money to that company is because that platform, if he can show that it works for the Moderna vaccine, he will own it for all medicines. Oh, he owns it forever.
– He owns-
– Oh, I mean, not him, but NIAID, his agency, which is his power. I mean, it’s like you can’t separate him from NIAID anymore than you can Bill Gates from the Gates Foundation ’cause people are not trying to make currency there. Money for them is currency, but it’s a currency of power. It’s purchasing power over other human beings, and that’s why everybody ultimately wants to accumulate more money than they can spend in a lifetime.>
It is a great exchange. The video is there but they transcribed it because he can be hard to understand.
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/transcripts/truth-with-rfk-jr-and-naomi-wolf-fighting-for-our-constitutional-rights/
They’ve already started the booster!!? ?
??♀️
Why bother?
Printing billions, if not even trillions, by getting "everyone" vaccinated.
Achieve full totalitarian control.
If overpopulation is their concern (which by everything known about upcoming science and tech is an uneducated and unrealistic claim), then they can just leave people fighting over crumbs. They control logistics, so they can just let entire towns disappear without anybody knowing. After all, they controlled all the media as well.
Until Q came along that is.
Unfortunately, most liberals I know have gleefully received the jabs already. But, I have had luck changing the minds of some by simply reminding them of how much they used to hate the evil pharmaceutical companies. That used to be something we all agreed on...
Here is a stronger argument for your liberal friends. "My body, my choice".
They're blind and deaf. I tried that line but they'll just ignore me and say "geeett vaccinnattteed."
The ancients say that sexual sins blind the intellect so you cannot see the truth at all. This is why fornication, porn, and birth control need to be illegal so we won't have leftists get to this point of total blindness.
So, our parents were right about the whole "you'll go blind if you keep doing that" thing. Who knew? Kek.
Good. The more libs removed from the gene pool the better. It's a cancer. This is 21st century DARWINISM.
Survival of the smartest, yo.
One of many things I used to agree with liberals on, that they seem to have moved on from because the tv told them to
The title is a little misleading. It should be (from the article):
Poll: 78 Percent of Unvaccinated Americans to Stay that Way, Unlikely to Change Their Mind
So if 40% of the country hasn't been jabbed and 78% of that number will not change their mind, it's really like 31% of total Americans or around 100 million.
That will still roughly give them the 70% vaccinated rate they are looking for, which is what they want for a veto-proof super majority of voters when they try to take away the rights of the vaccinated. Most difficult to pass legislation requires a 2/3 vote, which 70% will comfortably put them at.
PSA: Never accept or amplify the term "Vaccine Hesitant." That implies somebody just needs a little push to get them to come back over to the side that they already know is normal.
NLP-level framing. I'm no more "hesitant" to get the vaccine than I'm "hesitant" to go get hit by a car.
I REJECT the vaccine outright.
For the sake of argument, let's say its legit they just horrifically fucked up the marketing/ messaging.
They have a very very long road ahead to regain credibility and nurture confidence. The continued pummeling of any discussion around side effects is a big deal that must be addressed. the conflict of interest between the people pushing rhe pandemic and the people who stand to gain from the supposed cure MUST be addressed.
The origins of the virus must be addressed. How it effected the election and its legitimacy MUST be addressed
There cannot be any "whoopsy our bad" allowed for this.
Can we please stop calling it a vaccine, and stop saying vaccinated since we all know this is not a vaccine and you're not getting vaccinated. It's an experimental genetic therapy with unknown outcomes.
Part of the 78% right here.
Unwilling to get jabbed by a non-vaccine.
Thats why they started calling it a "jab". It is not actually a vaccine, it doesn't stimulate production of antibodies prepared from the causative agent of a disease. It changes your DNA.
When we don’t know our rights or the law, we can get railroaded. They cannot mandate, force, without informed consent. People are getting this toxin injected without INFORMED consent. This is crime against humanity dealt by the ICC. We have international law, Nuremberg Code Article 6.
https://pointtalkers.com/2020/12/05/21620/
Nope. Nien. Nõ. Nyet.
I have a friend in the hospital and another relative paralyzed from their waist down after the second Moderna and Pfizer shot. Why would I like to join them?
That number is very likely to grow as new peer review information if published that correctly identifies the very serious consequences of the mRNA vaccine.
The headline of your post is misleading. It makes it sound like 78% of people unwilling to get vaccinated.
The story's headline says 78% of Americans who are unvaccinated plan on staying that way.
That nuance is a big difference.
That's the amount of people who won't take it, out of the ones who haven't. The article says 78% of unvaxxed are unlikely to change their mind. But percentage of vaxxed isn't really high at all, according to the page below. The state with the highest percentage of vaxxed is only at 59%. Lowest is 27.5% percent vaxxed,
https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/map-covid-19-vaccination-tracker-across-u-s-n1252085
The percentages are listed under the map by state name, and I sorted the list by percentage. I added the percent at the beginning of the line for the sorting but it's just duplicated from the number at the end,
27.5% Mississippi 1,022,358 34,352 27.5%
29.4% Alabama 1,774,139 36,183 29.4%
30.6% U.S. Virgin Islands 38,541 36,818 30.6%
31.8% Arkansas 1,210,066 40,098 31.8%
31.9% Louisiana 1,690,689 36,368 31.9%
32.3% Tennessee 2,709,398 39,674 32.3%
32.3% Wyoming 217,562 37,591 32.3%
33.0% Utah 1,466,189 45,733 33.0%
33.4% Georgia 4,348,580 40,957 33.4%
33.4% Idaho 680,620 38,086 33.4%
34.2% Oklahoma 1,663,357 42,036 34.2%
34.6% West Virginia 740,855 41,339 34.6%
34.9% South Carolina 2,141,058 41,584 34.9%
35.1% Missouri 2,627,118 42,805 35.1%
35.2% American Samoa 23,982 43,064 35.2%
36.4% Indiana 2,861,249 42,501 36.4%
36.6% Texas 13,102,370 45,187 36.6%
36.7% North Carolina 4,595,887 43,820 36.7%
37.0% Arizona 3,432,146 47,153 37.0%
37.1% North Dakota 325,017 42,650 37.1%
38.0% Nevada 1,433,848 46,551 38.0%
39.0% Kansas 1,378,624 47,322 39.0%
39.0% Montana 489,239 45,776 39.0%
39.0% Puerto Rico 1,678,495 52,557 39.0%
39.3% Kentucky 2,108,436 47,193 39.3%
40.2% Alaska 342,656 46,840 40.2%
40.3% Florida 10,792,205 50,248 40.3%
40.8% Northern Mariana Islands 26,817 47,145 40.8%
41.2% Illinois 7,111,417 56,120 41.2%
41.2% Ohio 5,446,690 46,596 41.2%
43.0% Nebraska 946,673 48,939 43.0%
43.0% South Dakota 430,989 48,718 43.0%
43.1% Michigan 4,936,204 49,427 43.1%
44.7% Delaware 542,781 55,741 44.7%
44.8% Iowa 1,572,936 49,854 44.8%
44.9% California 22,957,251 58,102 44.9%
45.1% Pennsylvania 7,625,623 59,566 45.1%
45.6% Wisconsin 3,018,776 51,847 45.6%
46.2% Guam 93,367 56,324 46.2%
46.5% Virginia 4,803,820 56,280 46.5%
46.7% Colorado 3,181,716 55,250 46.7%
47.1% Oregon 2,353,525 55,801 47.1%
47.3% Minnesota 3,110,259 55,150 47.3%
47.5% District of Columbia 408,830 57,929 47.5%
48.4% Hawaii 957,386 67,618 48.4%
48.4% New York 11,063,492 56,871 48.4%
48.7% Washington 4,416,901 58,003 48.7%
48.8% New Mexico 1,227,490 58,540 48.8%
49.7% New Jersey 5,423,245 61,058 49.7%
49.8% Maryland 3,534,703 58,467 49.8%
51.0% New Hampshire 822,727 60,507 51.0%
53.4% Rhode Island 657,368 62,053 53.4%
55.2% Connecticut 2,293,608 64,332 55.2%
55.8% Maine 861,622 64,099 55.8%
56.3% Massachusetts 4,672,901 67,797 56.3%
59.0% Vermont 446,489 71,554 59.0%
They will have to kill me first!!
Ammunition.
They won't take their own shot. ~ TGP
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/05/wow-nearly-half-niaid-fda-employees-refusing-covid-vaccine-according-marks-fauci/
78 percent. Kind blows the numbers the government is putting out to nshit.
'My medical history is privileged and none of your business'
I'm done talking about them beyond my core group of friends.
Well, Trump's still been doing his part in messaging on the vax to get that 78% knocked down significantly.