How is it possible every nation in the Antarctic treaty has held up their end of the deal? No oil exploration? Nothing? Seriously? Why does John Kerry keep going there? He may be a Globalist climate radical, but seriously? He's not a scientist! Why is every thing these people have done exactly like Nazis? Even down to medical experimentation?Where did those 43,000 german women who were shipped to Antarctica at the end of WWII go? Is it possible we are actually dealing with the 4th Reich? Did Nazis really escape to Antarctica? Why can't a plane traverse it? Why are all plane paths set to completely avoid it? Environmental reasons? For real? If you believe that, I've got a bridge to sell you! What is our reality? WHO or WHAT is in Antarctica?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (632)
sorted by:
Uh…..no
I don't believe that, but I do find it funny when we treat each other or others with derision about some theory that sounds "crazy"... when so much of the country think "WE" all sound crazy. :)
I think by now we should realize that anything is possible, but, yes, people do need to cite their evidence, even if it's thin.
"Anybody got any new conspiracy theories?
All of mine came true."
Considering that the Nazis went to Antarctica with antigravity technology, imagine the technology they must have now without having inventors continually paid-off or suicided, as they are elsewhere.
I bet they've had medbeds for decades. I bet they have unlimited energy sources without using oil, gas or even solar.
Consider = imagine. It is all fantasy. I bet they don't have any such nonsense. Prove me wrong and claim your bet.
There is also the Tesla information.
I bet they have effectively eradicated illnesses.. I bet they are figuring out "what space really is".
I bet the simpler answer is probably the true one; that you've just played too many video games.
what they said is not as ridiculous as you may think; the bible refers to many of these "extraterrestrials" as annunaki / nephilim and the seed of the serpent.
10 years ago, I would've said this was guano loco, but now? Now, I don't think I can be surprised by anything that ends up being the truth. Whatever that ends up being, I just wish it would hurry up and come out already!
No, it doesn't.
"Annunaki" is not a word in the Bible; it is neither Hebrew nor Greek. It comes from the Sumerian language and refers to the highest-ranking gods in their pantheon. It is also found in the languages of the Akkadians and later the Assyrians and Babylonians, who displaced the Sumerians.
"Nephilim" is in the Bible, but it does not refer to extraterrestrials. In Hebrew, it simply means "giants" and refers to humans prior to the Flood as well as some people who were of large stature that the Israelites encountered in Canaan (Numbers 13:33). Two such individuals were Goliath and King Og of Bashan (1 Samuel 17:4; Deuteronomy 3:11).
The "seed of the serpent" isn't found word-for-word in the Bible, but I presume you're referring to Genesis 3:14-15, which says:
Who is the serpent? According to Revelation 20:2, it's Satan.
Who are the seed, or children, of Satan? According to John 8:42-44, they are wicked people, just as righteous people are called the sons and daughters of God (2 Corinthians 6:17-18).
The confusion regarding the term nephilim comes from the unbiblical Book of Enoch, which claims that the "sons of God" mentioned in Genesis 6:4 were angels that had sex with human women and that the giants were their offspring.
There are multiple problems with this interpretation. Firstly, while the term "sons of God" can be applied to angels, this only appears to be the case in three places (Job 1:6; 2:1; 38:7). Even then, it's not entirely clear whether the beings spoken of in those verses are angels or extraterrestrials from unfallen worlds. Meanwhile, all other instances of the phrase "sons of God" in the Bible refer to righteous humans.
Secondly, we know that angels do not marry (Matthew 22:30; Mark 12:25; Luke 20:35-36) but according to Genesis 6:2, the "sons of God" took the "daughters of men" as wives for themselves. If we then still assume that these "sons of God" were angels, then by marrying human women they would be going against the will of God and would've became fallen angels. However, there are no accounts of any more angels having fallen after the War in Heaven, which took place prior to the time period recorded in Genesis 6. Also, fallen angels, like wicked humans, are never referred to as "sons of God."
In actuality, the "sons of God" and the "daughters of men" are the descendants of Seth and Cain, respectively. Just like today, the children of each generation took after their parents; the descendants of Seth were righteous (Genesis 4:25-26; 5:1-32), while the descendants of Cain were wicked (Genesis 4:1-24). Over time, members of these two bloodlines mingled and the righteous compromised with the wicked, which led to nearly all of humanity becoming thoroughly evil (Genesis 6:5, 11-12). Noah, who was a descendant of Seth, was an exception to this (Genesis 6:8-9).
Thanks for the free education - very well stated.
The BIGGEST deceptions on earth are all for one purpose: to hide the working and existence of the Nephilim.
Exactly. The Demi-god “Hero’s” of old.
I could definitely believe that.
No the bible doesnt.
The delusion here is off the charts, dont attach your nonsense to the Truth.
what does the bible say happens to the annunaki/nephilim/giants? Why did many of the books that were removed/censored from the bible have strong references to these creatures? Who/what was Nimrod?
LOL I wish I was getting paid to post dank red pills like this. Q itself said that the closer to the truth the more risk of "conspiracy" label... Open your mind.
I do think that when everything is revealed we'll find that the truth is way more bizarre than anything we could have imagined.
I'm in "wait and see" mode with everything that sounds super crazy?
Sauce or GTFO
MJ12 IYKYK
I can’t deal with the reptilian story line. Just too nonsensical for me
Is it a specific sequence or gene in our DNA that connects us to the Creator?
The God connection is missing or in sociopaths?
Then say that. There are people walking around thinking half lizards from space are living in Antarctica
totally agree. this is just stupid to refer to them thst way instead of just using the word sociopaths
Humans are the reptilians..
Always have been
Remember that it could be partially true or beyond what we can comprehend. The spiritual world/realm is very real. Nephillum, Satan, evil etc... exist but so do Angels and Light
I buy some version of it.
Isn't that what the devil looks like?
And then there's the Vatican Audience Hall. Very reptilian.
In Revelation, Satan is referred to as "the dragon" and "that old serpent," however those terms are not a physical description, but rather hearken back to the serpent in the Garden of Eden. Ezekiel 28:11-19 essentially says that he was beautiful before he fell.
Indeed. To be specific, it looks like a snake's head.
Perhaps snake-like, ode to satan or the original sin. Not Lizards from outer space
LOL. I'm with you on that.
Antarctica is larger than Europe. Imagine flying over it and having to do an emergency landing. How the hell would you survive?
Seems like a plausible reason to never send aircraft over it as a means of transportation. No reason to, and plenty of reason not to.
People should drop this "argument" because nobody will take it seriously.
As for the rest, I dunno ...
I wonder if they are not really going to Antarctica, but rather either someplace in New Zealand or possibly Pine Gap, Australia (there is a US satellite surveillance base there), or maybe a ship named Antarctica.
See for yourself
flightradar24.com
I don't know.
Sure, and lots of ships, islands, rescue teams, etc. that at least have a chance of getting to them.
Yep. It's all a pro/con calculation. No real reason to fly over, no real benefit, and plenty of reason not to.
Not with the temperatures much of the year. This is not exactly Hawaii we're talking about here.
Simply think about the resources that could exist there. What could they build and traffic there without any knowledge. Epstein could be there in a fucking palace and we'd have no clue. They take and hide everything from us and it must end now. Also, lets say they have knowledge of an event coming or they are creating a natural disaster. What if Antarctica was the safest place to be
When the pole shift happens and the earth wobbles to the side, Antarctica will be on the equator, the U.S. will be the new south pole and Russia and China will be the North Pole. Antarctica will be on the equator. Future real estate deals going on with the powers that be?
The Earth never wobbles onto its side. Life on earth would end if it did so.
What does happen is called axial precession and it is caused by bulging at the equator induced by the moon and suns gravity. Imagine a line drawn north/south through the poles. The earth spins around this axis. But the axis itself also spins much like a spinning top which is easily seen as the tops rotation slows.
Right now Polaris is the north star but it hasnt always been. About 5000 years ago the north star was Alpha Draconis and in about 13000 more years it will be Vega. It takes about 26000 years for the earths axis to make one complete rotation and the geometry it carves out would look like two cones joined at their apices.
Provided it's livable, you're right.
I wouldn't want to live in northern Alaska, or the Arctic Circle, or Antarctica. But then, we don't know what they might have built there.
With that logic flying over the oceans is dangerous. No its weird that NO ONE flys over Antarctica? Something is there but what???
Ha!
It’s just this stuff if real is X Files that were done that you just go hmmmm? What?