posted ago by 10122046 ago by 10122046 +428 / -0

Lin Wood posted on Telegram:

“I have done my research and connected the dots.

I will not change my position on the “vaccine.” I will not take it. End of that discussion.

I believe that in a free society, each citizen has the legal right to make his or her own choices on medical treatment. Each citizen must also live with the consequences of their decisions. That is why I always urge that you choose wisely.

I am confident that I have chosen wisely.

I also strongly believe that government does not have the right to mandate vaccinations. In my opinion, any such mandate is a violation of an individual’s right of privacy.”


Comments (36)
sorted by:
Rightminded 32 points ago +32 / -0

Ditto! 👏👏👏👏

Oh_Well_ian 26 points ago +27 / -1

Simple... it's a medical issue

you cannot make me go to the doctor or take any treatment against my freewill

They've given us the perfect issue to destroy their authority.

We just need gather together and run them over with our FREEDOM.

aquasmurf 10 points ago +10 / -0


Run them over with our LIBERTY. But, I'm with you.

PhDinNY 1 point ago +1 / -0

They started with requiring medical insurance; that was the beginning.

Phishhed44 24 points ago +24 / -0

Always was.


horseyPatriot 4 points ago +4 / -0

Gif name? I’m having to create my own since the page is still kaput! I have a growing list on a sticky on my monitor :)

Phishhed44 2 points ago +2 / -0


horseyPatriot 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thanks! if I’m on my computer I’ll views the page source to grab them but I was on my phone then... The funny thing is you told me the coup one and that’s the only one I can remember without looking them up.

Phishhed44 2 points ago +2 / -0

There’s so many good ones too. I queried the mods that the gif page was “down” and got a thanks, but it’s now broke worse? I dunno. The gifs add spice if they’re used appropriately. Too much spice ruins a dish tho, eh?

Rhinomyte 3 points ago +3 / -0


Brabarian714 5 points ago +6 / -1

So what does this S.P. have to do with Lin Wood?

lanalex 8 points ago +8 / -0

He’s quoting Lin Woods latest telegram post.

PelosiSux1776 5 points ago +5 / -0

Agreed. Should not be mandated. I’m sure it’s fine for the population that needs it, but I don’t need it for a 99 plus survival rate.

TastyRamen 5 points ago +6 / -1

Seems like more and more conservatives are encouraging it tho. I'm not a fan of Hannity (i think he is a shill) but he recently encourage people to take the vaccine and even said, "I believe in the science" and Kayleigh was also pushing getting the vaccine.

Rainspa 7 points ago +7 / -0

If it is science, it does not require "belief".

TastyRamen 2 points ago +2 / -0

If I hear anyone say, "I believe in the science" my brain immediately shuts off.

Lapstrake 5 points ago +5 / -0

OP I agree wholeheartedly with everything you just said.

But I would like to know if this is Lin Wood's words and some sauce to share with others.

deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
Merkava_4 3 points ago +3 / -0

Here is a reminder of some of the people who died from the vaccine :


DrMcCoy 1 point ago +1 / -0

Good video.

SwansonRon 3 points ago +3 / -0

Interesting that he chose the word “privacy”. Perhaps the theories floating around that the vax has tracking capabilities carry some truth. Just a thought 👀

GA-Peach-Patriot 2 points ago +2 / -0

The government is mandating vaccines via private companies. Same way they are censoring free speech. Our government is nothing more than a Marxist regime.

Magamomma333 2 points ago +3 / -1


basedsaltmerchant 1 point ago +1 / -0

Lin wood is a god, joke aside I think that like me he is speaking to god directly and it’s beautiful

Lopeover 1 point ago +1 / -0

👏👏I agree!

VetforTrump 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't care what the governments position is. I'm not taking it.

antonlevay -4 points ago +1 / -5

....so is he for abortion...?

10122046 [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

Lin Wood is a man of God, you tell me.

antonlevay -4 points ago +1 / -5

"each citizen has the legal right to make his or her own choices on medical treatment" - sounds like that supports abortion rights

10122046 [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

We know the developing baby is a separate person.

antonlevay -2 points ago +1 / -3

So can you add them as a dependant on your taxes? Do they count as child support?

10122046 [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

God creates Life.

Cabal created the IRS.

Judicator 1 point ago +1 / -0

Is all law just, realistic, and fact based?

Obviously not.

The developing baby is a separate organism with fully human DNA, not identical to the mother's. It's not a tumor that more or less matches DNA with it's host.

Just because the federal government doesn't recognize them as persons doesn't mean they aren't. If it were up to the federal government, then Africans wouldn't have actually been people until the civil war, which is obvious nonsense.

Each human being has equal fundamental rights; a woman's "right" to cease pregnancy does not outweigh the baby's right to life. The area gets greyer when you introduce the situation in which either the baby or the mother lives, but nothing like that can realistically be accurately predicted, therefore action taken on said information would be incredibly perilous, akin to killing someone else on a boat stranded out at sea to eat them because "they'll probably kill me if I don't get them first".

My right to not receive certain medical treatments cannot be outweighed by your "right" to force them upon me; I can't force you to not get the vaccine any more than you can force me to get it.

If you really wanted to ignore the facts and stats, you could ask "what gives you the right to put my life in danger by not receiving the vaccine? Is your right to life any greater than mine?". On it's surface, that's a valid question, but the answer lies in matters of proximity and the actual action in question itself.

My decision to not receive the vaccine may put you at an elevated risk by proxy, however I am not actively doing anything to you to endanger your life. In the other situation, however, you forcefully vaccinating me is an active action you would be taking on me that [may] endanger my life.

The difference is like this: If we're at a gun range, and I'm shooting at the target, there's a chance there will be some kind of freak accident and you are killed by it. That's indirect and by proxy. Compare that to you shooting at me explicitly; you may not hit me, but you are directly putting my life in danger.

KickingPugilist 2 points ago +2 / -0

Their own choices, not choices for the human inside of them. Even if that human was brought to this earth "by mistake."

I can see an argument for rape though I can't justify the taking of a life either way. The only way I can see that would be in some cases where the mother would die if she goes through with it.

Patriot_Perks 2 points ago +2 / -0

Not if you consider the baby a baby.

Of course Anton Levay did not, but he’s burning in hell right now.